Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proud2BlibKansan

(96,793 posts)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 01:21 AM Nov 2012

A call for President Obama to change course on education

Arthur H. Camins is director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education at the Stevens Institute of Technology in New Jersey.

With the election behind us, it is time for the Obama administration to step back from its education policy and access whether its foundation is sound and supported by evidence. It is a moment to summon the courage to change course.

We have had wars on drugs, poverty and terrorism. Now, depending on perspective, we have a war either for or on education. Certainly, many educators feel under siege. Popular slogans like, “Whatever it takes,” sound like battle cries. This brings to mind the documentary film, “The Fog of War,” as a metaphor for education reform.

In the hopeful 1960s, the nation’s focus on poverty was undone by a president fearful of accusations of being weak on defense and soft on communism and trapped by unexamined cold war logic. Lyndon Johnson failed to heed President Eisenhower’s prescient warning to beware of the influence of the military industrial complex. As many presidents who succeeded him, Johnson permitted the defense industry to have undue influence in the making of foreign policy.

In the “Fog of War,” an aged and surprisingly reflective war architect, Robert McNamara, makes a compelling case that once the United States found itself enmeshed in war, an intellectual shroud clouded the ability of policy makers to see the evidence in front of them. Vietnam War-era policy makers understood North Vietnam as a tile in a row of falling dominoes that would lead to the worldwide communist domination. While it was readily apparent that their assumptions about the motivations of the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong were entirely mistaken, Johnson and his advisers could not recognize or admit that they were wrong. Nor could they summon the courage to change course. Such is the distorting power of unexamined ideology.

more ... http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2012/11/07/a-call-for-president-obama-to-change-course-on-education/
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A call for President Obama to change course on education (Original Post) proud2BlibKansan Nov 2012 OP
Education POL_POT Nov 2012 #1
get rid of Sidwell Friends school mrf901 Nov 2012 #2
Using McDonalds as a comparison is very apt. cprise Nov 2012 #3
too late, it is privatization full steam ahead, suck the $$ out the top and stiff the kids n staff n msongs Nov 2012 #4
Not the first call. LWolf Nov 2012 #5
Probably not. FBaggins Nov 2012 #6
Linda Darling-Hammond should be Ed Sec. elleng Nov 2012 #7
And should have been from the beginning. LWolf Nov 2012 #11
My only major disagreement with this administration, elleng Nov 2012 #12
Start with NCLB and RttT Modern School Nov 2012 #8
I hate the use of the word "reform" to describe what is being done. savebigbird Nov 2012 #9
The public education system is not being reformed. It is being dismantled. MichiganVote Nov 2012 #10
AMEN!!! savebigbird Nov 2012 #13
Exactly. madfloridian Nov 2012 #14
Yup. And people are blind to it. They think that because you call a thing MichiganVote Nov 2012 #15
Something that people aren't talking about... savebigbird Nov 2012 #16
 

POL_POT

(6 posts)
1. Education
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 01:23 AM
Nov 2012

What Obama needs to do is subsidize post-secondary education.
As well as create an entirely centralized education system so everyone gets taught equally.
No more "private" school or religious ones.

cprise

(8,445 posts)
3. Using McDonalds as a comparison is very apt.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 02:43 AM
Nov 2012

Pervasive testing is the fast food of education: You get a very consistent and franchise-able -- but low quality -- product.

Why reformers do this is two-fold: Monetization of community services, and easy automation of the teaching process. It attacks a professional demographic that steadfastly leans liberal, turning their jobs into fill-in-the-blank and multiple choice questions on a website.

Charter schools will mainly serve to train young students how to operate and obey a computer so that their later studies will involve almost no teachers and scant socialization (draining the "liberal swamp" neocons refer to).

FBaggins

(26,748 posts)
6. Probably not.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 11:20 AM
Nov 2012

Teachers used to be an incredibly powerful force within the Democratic party.

It isn't that this influence is entirely gone, but if the president pushed (and even bragged about) these policies prior to the election (in the face of teacher opposition)... there's little reason to believe that he will reverse course after the threat of losing their support loses what teeth it had.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
11. And should have been from the beginning.
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 09:58 PM
Nov 2012

I knew there was a problem as soon as he started making appointments after the '04 election, and his rejection of Darling-Hammond in favor of Duncan was the nail in the coffin as far as I was concerned.

I was right.

Modern School

(794 posts)
8. Start with NCLB and RttT
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 10:09 PM
Nov 2012

The best (and first) thing Obama could do to change course is end NCLB and RttT. Both are terrible for kids and teachers.

I have to agree with the previous commentator: the corporate ed vultures have already got the feet in the door and they are unlikely to let it close again: private charters, common core, evaluation reform, blended learning, etc.

There are just so many ways to siphon public funds into the hands of private entrepreneurs and Obama is indebted to many of them. It just doesn't seem likely he will betray his sponsors.

savebigbird

(417 posts)
9. I hate the use of the word "reform" to describe what is being done.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 10:37 PM
Nov 2012

"Reform" insinuates that something is being improved. What is happening with education in the US is more accurately described as a sell-out.

 

MichiganVote

(21,086 posts)
15. Yup. And people are blind to it. They think that because you call a thing
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 05:04 PM
Nov 2012

another name, or put it in another building, or give it a new way to be funded it is the same. It is NOT the same. Public education is a cornerstone of a democracy. And we are just permitting them's that want to, chip, chip, chip it all away.

savebigbird

(417 posts)
16. Something that people aren't talking about...
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 11:42 PM
Nov 2012

...is the misguided focus on processing skills. Kids essentially spend the majority of their time in K-6 focusing on reading phonics and comprehension skills and math low-level skills. Where did content knowledge go? What about the sciences (social and otherwise)? Guidance and instruction in creative thought? Problem solving?


People who brush off the issue of misguided education reform will REGRET it decades from now. Think about what makes America great - innovation, creativity, new ideas. These are things many global competitors observe in the US and attempt to emulate. Yet, we force standardization, standardization, standardization on our children. How can we expect them to carry the torch of innovative thought if we don't give them opportunities to take part in these thought processes?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»A call for President Obam...