Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Pixar Theory of Labor
http://www.theawl.com/2015/07/the-pixar-theory-of-labor
To live is to work is to live.
by James Douglas July 15, 2015
http://www.theawl.com/2015/07/the-pixar-theory-of-labor
A lot of Pixar films come packaged with a quasi-humanist narrative hook that enables the public digestion of their work. Viewers nodded thoughtfully over WALL-Es depiction of a future earth choked by the refuse of big-box retail, and of a human race infantilized and rendered obese by mindless consumption, while Brave was the first Pixar film to feature a female protagonista simple gesture, the long-overdueness of which did not do very much to diminish murmurs of appreciation. Pixars latest film and fifteenth feature, Inside Out, arrives with at least three female-coded lead roles, and an apparently sincere desire to render with sensitivity the interior life of a young girl.
That interior life is realized as a theme park-esque inner world, surrounding a gleaming control room (Headquarters) in which five personified emotionsJoy, the gung-ho leader; Anger; Fear; Disgust; and the little-liked Sadnesseach play a role in governing the personality of a human girl, Riley, who is undergoing a traumatic move to San Francisco, where her dad seems to be establishing some sort of tech start-up. When Joy and Sadness are accidentally lost in the outskirts of Rileys mind, they have to find their way back to Headquarters before her emotional sensibility is destabilized for good.
A lot of narrative business hinges on Joy learning to accept Sadnesss place within the ecosystem of Rileys mind. Sadnessfrumpy, dissolute, low-energyis a bit of a drag. Her very existence seems contrary to Joys key project, which is to ensure Riley is happy all the time; Sadness cant seem to help turning even Rileys happy golden memories a glum shade of blue. As per the logic of any buddy comedy, the two eventually learn to get along, and Sadness eventually proves her worth by helping to restore Rileys emotional equilibrium.
This is another matter of some regard in the public response to Inside Out. With the figure of Sadness, the film appears to permit the existence of negative emotions within a broader portrait of mental health, even to the point of validating depressive feelings. Corporate entertainmentthe thinking seems to goseeks to ensure that its audience is kept mindlessly, vapidly contentbut here is an exception, from the House of Mouse, no less. This evidence of humane, even progressive, thinking on the part of its writers and directors helps to contribute to the public perception of Pixar as an enlightened production housestill part of corporate Disney, for sure, but somehow authentic in spite of it. New York Times critic A. O. Scott even compared WALL-Es vision of a ruined earth to Werner Herzog at his most pessimistic.
FULL story at link.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1164 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Pixar Theory of Labor (Original Post)
Omaha Steve
Jul 2015
OP
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)1. "Teach our children well..."
What a revealing perspective on "children's entertainment."
I'm going to go back and review "Barney" episodes!
...The virtuous citizen cannot only consume but must produce, an imperative that finds its current (and particularly American) incarnation in the entrepreneur, the boot-strapper, the rags-to-riches hero, who is too busy pulling themselves up by their laces to notice that theres no top to reach. The natural and profitable ideological by-product of this fixation is an abhorrence of collectivismand therefore organized labor. To be collective, to be one among many, is to no longer be a special individual producer, which is its own kind of death. This is why Toy Story 2 abhors the idea of Woody becoming part of a box set.