Economy
Related: About this forumToday I heard that every American lost $70,000 income due to the 2008
financial collapse. Ali Velshi is a financial pro and he said this on MSNBC today. If everyone basically is $70,000 poorer due to this, how much of a toll does the current tax cuts for the rich (adding to the national deficit) cost each of us? Does anyone know the answer to this question yet?
MANative
(4,112 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,604 posts)tons due to Bear Stearns investments.
MANative
(4,112 posts)And four pending client contracts worth at least $160k that were canceled. Came within ten days of losing our house (after months of negotiation with our lender), if it hadn't been for another contract that came through at the last minute. It was a horrible time.
lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)If you spread the entire $21T national debt over the population of the US evenly... we each owe like $66,000 or $4K LESS than what we have lost/will lose due to the 2008 financial meltdown.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)every family in America would have received $50,000 cash - and we could have got together and started our own little local banks if we wanted to.
Instead - we just got the debt.
BlueTsunami2018
(3,492 posts)I was out of work for 19 months because of the Bush depression.
BigmanPigman
(51,604 posts)from 2000-2013. Salary increases in our union contracts were not given for over 5 years and some were forced to take early retirement. This effected everyone's pensions permanently by cutting them by 25%. Those still teaching were told to be grateful that we had jobs (you know teachers are lazy, greedy babysitters...at least that is what the GOP tells us constantly).
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)tirebiter
(2,537 posts)Bush has ownage on both crashes. The there's the lost work hours because of Enron...
BigmanPigman
(51,604 posts)JayhawkSD
(3,163 posts)Before you start flaming me as a right wing troll and a Drumpf supporter, I am neither. Voted for Obama twice. Just pointing out that nobody's skirts are clean in the enrichment of the upper class.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,369 posts)And Clinton signed that law because they would have over ridden his veto
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/106th_United_States_Congress
JayhawkSD
(3,163 posts)It shows the Senate as 46% Democratic, and the House as 48% Democratic, more than sufficient to prevent the override of a presidential veto.
Additionally, Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers, who served under Bill Clinton, were two of the leading advocates in modern history for loosening of economic regulation and were, between then them, the prime drivers of the repeal of Glass Stegall.
Bill Clinton was an enthusiastic supporter of the reduction in economic regulation.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,369 posts)I was clearly misinformed
Farmer-Rick
(10,175 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,604 posts)Obama had to try to save the country from a major depression. Some people wanted to let the greedy banks and hedge funds fail. People got mortgages with $0 money down and it all collapsed.
Mad-in-Mo
(229 posts)in wages --- lost my job of 25 years in January 2009, and took a new one in March paying much less. The difference in wages is for 9 years is $56,000+.
Hotler
(11,425 posts)the DOJ can find enough wrong doing to drag the likes of a Manafort and Cohen before the courts but, couldn't find enough to charge the Wall St. fuckers with jay walking. Now I'm pissed again.