Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Owlet

(1,248 posts)
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 08:15 AM Mar 2012

High health-care costs: It’s all in the pricing


"There is a simple reason health care in the United States costs more than it does anywhere else: The prices are higher.
That may sound obvious. But it is, in fact, key to understanding one of the most pressing problems facing our economy. In 2009, Americans spent $7,960 per person on health care. Our neighbors in Canada spent $4,808. The Germans spent $4,218. The French, $3,978. If we had the per-person costs of any of those countries, America’s deficits would vanish. Workers would have much more money in their pockets. Our economy would grow more quickly, as our exports would be more competitive."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/high-health-care-costs-its-all-in-the-pricing/2012/02/28/gIQAtbhimR_story.html
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

MarkCharles

(2,261 posts)
1. Ezra Klein is fast becoming one of my...
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 08:41 AM
Mar 2012

favorite writers on economic issues.

Thanks for posting this.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
2. Excellent, excellent article--explains the
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 08:54 AM
Mar 2012

US's inextricable health dilemma.
Basically, health care organized purely on the profit motive will always be inefficeint and unfair.

Thanks so much for posting this, Owlet. I have forwarded it on to my brother (an MD) who keeps railing against the "European Model" of "socialized medicine".
SG

canoeist52

(2,282 posts)
3. I cant believe Insurance Co,'s are only making 2.2% profit.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 10:20 AM
Mar 2012

"The players sitting across the table from them — the health insurers — are not so profitable. In 2009, their profit margins were a mere 2.2 percent. "
Is this mere 2.2 % profit margin AFTER paying the bloated salaries of Health Insurance companies'? Somehow I don't believe the two are adversaries.

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
5. If I'm correct, I believe bloated salaries are subtracted from sales (along with all other costs)
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 01:32 AM
Mar 2012

leaving the small profits.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
4. My husband got a root canal in the Netherlands for $25 American in 1996
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 06:07 AM
Mar 2012

The governmnent also paid for his education through dental school, and controlled the prices of his inputs, however.

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
6. Ron Suskind's "Confidence Men" covered this pretty well.
Tue Mar 13, 2012, 08:44 AM
Mar 2012

A study out of Dartmouth, called Atlas.

Obama understood it, and Orszag pushed it. But, in the Healthcare debate, the providers won the war. That's why the Insurance Companies got on board. It would have reigned in costs. And unnecessary procedures.

I'm no fan of insurance companies, but the providers have the best of both worlds. High prices, high profits, and the insurance companies take most of the heat.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»High health-care costs: I...