Economy
Related: About this forumSTOCK MARKET WATCH -- Friday, 2 October 2015
[font size=3]STOCK MARKET WATCH, Friday, 2 October 2015[font color=black][/font]
SMW for 1 October 2015
AT THE CLOSING BELL ON 1 October 2015
[center][font color=red]
Dow Jones 16,272.01 -12.69 (-0.08%)
[font color=green]S&P 500 1,923.82 +3.79 (0.20%)
Nasdaq 4,627.08 +6.92 (0.15%)
[font color=red]10 Year 2.04% +0.01 (0.49%)
30 Year 2.85% +0.02 (0.71%) [font color=black]
[center][/font]
[HR width=85%]
[font size=2]Market Conditions During Trading Hours[/font]
[center]
(click on link for latest updates)
Market Updates
[/center]
[font size=2]Euro, Yen, Loonie, Silver and Gold[center]
[/center]
[/center]
[HR width=95%]
[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Market Data and News:[/font][/font]
[center]
Economic Calendar
Marketwatch Data
Bloomberg Economic News
Yahoo Finance
Google Finance
Bank Tracker
Credit Union Tracker
Daily Job Cuts
[/center]
[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Economic Blogs:[/font][/font]
[center]
The Big Picture
Financial Sense
Calculated Risk
Naked Capitalism
Credit Writedowns
Brad DeLong
Bonddad
Atrios
goldmansachs666
The Stand-Up Economist
The Automatic Earth
Wall Street on Parade
[/center]
[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Essential Reading:[/font][/font]
[center]
Matt Taibi: Secret and Lies of the Bailout
[/center]
[font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Government Issues:[/font][/font]
[center]
LegitGov
Open Government
Earmark Database
USA spending.gov
[/center][font color=black][font size=2]Handy Links - Videos:[/font][/font]
[center]
Charlie Rose talks with Roubini
Charlie Rose talks with Krugman
William Black: This Economic Disaster
Bill Moyers with Kevin Drum and David Corn
[/center]
[div]
[font color=red]Partial List of Financial Sector Officials Convicted since 1/20/09 [/font][font color=red]
2/2/12 David Higgs and Salmaan Siddiqui, Credit Suisse, plead guilty to conspiracy involving valuation of MBS
3/6/12 Allen Stanford, former Caribbean billionaire and general schmuck, convicted on 13 of 14 counts in $2.2B Ponzi scheme, faces 20+ years in prison
6/4/12 Matthew Kluger, lawyer, sentenced to 12 years in prison, along with co-conspirator stock trader Garrett Bauer (9 years) and co-conspirator Kenneth Robinson (not yet sentenced) for 17 year insider trading scheme.
6/14/12 Allen Stanford sentenced to 110 years without parole.
6/15/12 Rajat Gupta, former Goldman Sachs director, found guilty of insider trading. Could face a decade in prison when sentenced later this year.
6/22/12 Timothy S. Durham, 49, former CEO of Fair Financial Company, convicted of one count conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, 10 counts of wire fraud, and one count of securities fraud.
6/22/12 James F. Cochran, 56, former chairman of the board of Fair, convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, one count of securities fraud, and six counts of wire fraud.
6/22/12 Rick D. Snow, 48, former CFO of Fair, convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud, one count of securities fraud, and three counts of wire fraud.
7/13/12 Russell Wassendorf Sr., CEO of collapsed brokerage firm Peregrine Financial Group Inc. arrested and charged with lying to regulators after admitting to authorities he embezzled "millions of dollars" and forged bank statements for "nearly twenty years."
8/22/12 Doug Whitman, Whitman Capital LLC hedge fund founder, convicted of insider trading following a trial in which he spent more than two days on the stand telling jurors he was innocent
10/26/12 UPDATE: Former Goldman Sachs director Rajat Gupta sentenced to two years in federal prison. He will, of course, appeal. . .
11/20/12 Hedge fund manager Matthew Martoma charged with insider trading at SAC Capital Advisors, and prosecutors are looking at Martoma's boss, Steven Cohen, for possible involvement.
02/14/13 Gilbert Lopez, former chief accounting officer of Stanford Financial Group, and former controller Mark Kuhrt sentenced to 20 yrs in prison for their roles in Allen Sanford's $7.2 billion Ponzi scheme.
03/29/13 Michael Sternberg, portfolio mgr at SAC Capital, arrested in NYC, charged with conspiracy and securities fraud. Pled not guilty and freed on $3m bail.
04/04/13 Matthew Marshall Taylor,fmr Goldman Sachs trader arrested, charged by CFTC w/defrauding his employer on $8BN futures bet "by intentionally concealing the true huge size, as well as the risk and potential profits or losses associated."
04/04/13 Matthew Taylor admits guilt, makes plea bargain. Sentencing set for 26 June; faces up to 20 years in prison but will likely only see 3-4 years. Says, "I am truly sorry."
04/11/13 Ex-KPMG LLP partner Scott London charged by federal prosecutors w/passing inside tips to a friend in exchange for cash, jewelry, and concert tickets; expected to plead guilty in May.
08/01/13 Fabrice Tourré convicted on six counts of security fraud, including "aiding and abetting" his former employer, Goldman Sachs
08/14/13 Javier Martin-Artajo and Julien Grout charged with wire fraud, falsifying records, and conspiracy in connection with JP Morgan's "London Whale" trade.
08/19/13 Phillip A. Falcone, manager of hedge fund Harbinger Capital Partners, agrees to admit to "wrongdoing" in market manipulation. Will banned from securities industry for 5 years and pay $18MM in disgorgement and fines.
09/16/13 Javier Martin-Artajo and Julien Grout officially indicted on charges associated with "London Whale" trade.
02/06/14 Matthew Martoma convicted of insider trading while at hedge fund SAC (Stephen A. Cohen) Capital Advisors. Expected sentence 7-10 years.
03/24/14 Annette Bongiorno, Bernard Madoff's secretary; Daniel Bonventre, director of operations for investments; JoAnn Crupi, an account manager; and Jerome O'Hara and George Perez, both computer programmers convicted of conspiracy to defraud clients, securities fraud, and falsifying the books and records.
05/19/14 Credit Suisse, which has an investment bank branch in NYC, agrees to plead guilty and pay appx. $2.6 billion penalties for helping wealthy Americans hide wealth and avoid taxes.
09/08/14 Matthew Martoma, convicted SAC trader, sentenced to 9 years in prison plus forfeiture of $9.3 million, including home and bank accounts
08/03/15 Former City (London) trader Tom Hayes found guilty of rigging global Libor interest rates. Each fo eight counts carries up to 10 yr. sentence.
08/21/15 Charles Antonucci Sr, former pres. Park Ave. Bank sentenced to 2.5 years in prison for bribery, fraud, embezzlement, and attempt to steal $11MM in TARP bailout funds, as well as $37.5MM fraud on OK insurance company. To pay $54MM in restitution and give up additional $11MM.
09/21/15 Volkswagen CEO Martin Winterkorn apologizes for VW cheating on air quality standards with emission testing avoidance device. Stock drops 20%, fines may total $18B.
09/22/15 Stewart Parnell, CEO Peanut Corp. of America, sentenced to 28 years in prison for selling salmonella-tainted peanut butter that killed nine.
[HR width=95%]
[center]
[font size=3][font color=red]This thread contains opinions and observations. Individuals may post their experiences, inferences and opinions on this thread. However, it should not be construed as advice. It is unethical (and probably illegal) for financial recommendations to be given here.[/font][/font][/font color=red][font color=black]
Demeter
(85,373 posts)and by meeting with idiots, he doesn't move the rest of humans into his column.
What do you expect from a man who hasn't dealt with a woman on a personal level since he left home and his mother?
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Give us a theme, a topic, an artist...something, anything to distract from the deadly dullness of economics....
Because, my friends, while I'm feeling MUCH better, and the coughing is infrequent and painless, I got NADA. Well, I do have 6 weeks of chores to catch up on, but as for diversions and interests, not a hope of inspiration striking even a glancing blow.
I warn you, if I get desperate, you will all be feeling the Bern! When is the debate? Not until October 13th....hmmmm....no, it's too early. We could debate debates....which should be equally dull as economics.
So, save our thread! Pick something!
Taking my daughters out to dinner, now that we are all feeling risen from the dead...
mother earth
(6,002 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)You'll end up with a lot of Baroque music, though. Sure, why not?
Demeter
(85,373 posts)FIGURED I SHOULD EARN MY KEEP AND POST SOME NEWS...THE GIFT OF INSOMNIA
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/254860-dems-rise-against-obamas-financial-adviser-regs
Ninety-six House Democrats have signed onto a letter calling for President Obama to make significant changes to his regulatory proposal for financial advisers, writing that they're concerned the current pitch would limit low- and middle-income Americans' access to financial advice.
The missive is a blow to the administration's efforts to rally support within their own party on a proposal that Obama tried and failed to implement in 2010 and one that he's framed as an effort to rein in Wall Street.
And it's a sign that the business community and the financial advice industry has successfully convinced half of the Democratic caucus as well as all Republicans that Obama's current plan does more harm than good...Obama wants to implement a "fiduciary standard" that would increase disclosure requirements for financial advisers. He says it's needed to help consumers understand that their financial advisers might be earning a profit from Wall Street institutions by selling them financial advice packages.
But the industry argues that the proposal is not needed given the bevy of regulations that already exist. And they argue that the regulations would serve as a disincentive for financial advice firms to take on low-income clients, whose financial planning needs are less lucrative than wealthy Americans.
The large contingency of Democratic opposition on a financial services issue is rare, especially given that Obama and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) announced the proposal in March at a high-profile event at AARP's D.C. headquarters. MORE
I AM LEERY OF ANY POLICY OBAMA CHOOSES TO PROPAGATE, BUT IF SENATOR WARREN SIGNED ON, IT'S PROBABLY A GOOD ONE..
Demeter
(85,373 posts)THEN THE BANKSTERS CAN BAIL THEMSELVES OUT
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-29/low-bond-liquidity-may-trap-investors-when-rates-climb-imf-says
The flood of easy money from the worlds central banks may be masking the risk that bond markets may be starved for liquidity when interest rates increase to normal levels, the International Monetary Fund said.
Liquidity is tightening as banks become less willing to serve as market-makers amid tougher regulations and efforts by the financial industry to reduce risk, the IMF said in a study released on Tuesday.
Structural changes, such as reductions in market-making, appear to have reduced the level and resilience of market liquidity, although not at an alarming pace, the Washington-based IMF said.
As evidence of the markets fragility, the fund pointed to events such as the flash rally in U.S. Treasuries in October 2014, when yields on benchmark 10-year bonds plunged before bouncing back on seemingly little market news.
There could be a sudden deterioration in market liquidity and an increase in liquidity spillovers across asset classes once central banks start tightening the flow of money, the fund said. Market liquidity that is low is also likely to be fragile, but seemingly ample market liquidity can also suddenly drop."
JUST IGNORE THE RIGGING OF PRICES, THE FRAUD, THE ABUSE OF THE RETAIL CUSTOMERS, ETC.
MORE
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Predators and prey. The homeless and left-behind are at the bottom (decomposers). Most of everyone else is in the next layer up (producers). The rest, from the well-off to the wealthy, are consumers. Interesting how that language works, isnt it?
http://www.education.com/worksheet/article/food-chain-pyramid/
A recent piece I did on the British Labour politician Tony Benn featured a speech that offered a history of neoliberalism (click here to read and listen). Near the beginning of the speech, Benn said, This country and the world have been run by rich and powerful men from the beginning of time. Consider that for a moment, what that means about the arc of human history...Near the end of his short talk, referencing the Thatcher (and Reagan) counterrevolution against the great populist gains of the 19th and 20th centuries, he said that this is what the whole modern crisis is about, the restoration of power to those whove always controlled the world, the people who own the land and the resources and all the rest of it.
That radical re-transformation of the world back to control by its original and longtime owners, rich and powerful men, was begun in England by Margaret Thatcher and several deliberate policies. Benn (my emphasis): So privatization is a deliberate policy, along with the destruction of local democracy and the destruction of the trade unions to restore power back to to where it was. Benn also mentions the role of crushing personal debt in the Thatcher de-democratization of her society:
Notice that this re-transformation back to what was, this re-transfer of power to societys original owners, isnt about any ideology, any set of theories, any academic anything about invisible hands or mathematically correct economic models. This is about one group rich and powerful men reasserting control of the world, a control theyve enjoyed since the virtual beginning of time, since the first day property meant more than just personal property (what I carry and wear) and included ownership of fields, buildings and land itself. That period, which started the day the first city-state, the first temple-state arose, lasted more than 5,000 years. For almost all of the time since humanity left the Stone Age, the mass of humans have been ruled by the rich and powerful, until the opening of a very brief window initiated, as Benn tells it, by the trade union movement of the mid-1800s. That small window is now closing. Were watching the end, if we allow it, of this one-time-only freshwater teardrop in time, as it falls to become lost in the deep well of our salt-water civilized past. (And dont be confused. If that small window, the 250-year period of relative freedom, closes if rich and powerful men regain full control as they have almost already done they will also end the 5,000-year window of human civilization. Because, climate.)
Please dont take a short view of the times we inhabit together. This is whats at stake, now, this year, this election cycle, this decade at most, this quarter-century, which is more than half over...
Whats Called Capitalism Is Far from Any Model of Capitalism or Market
Simply put, were not living in a capitalist economy, and present economic activity is not properly described by the word market. To see and say that completely misses the facts. The economic theory were guided by, if it can be called a theory at all, is what Benn described at the start of his speech: This country and the world have been run by rich and powerful men from the beginning of time. The closest I can come to describing this theory is predators and prey. For more than 5,000 years the predators rich and powerful men enjoyed complete control. Capitalism is what theyre calling todays reassertion of that control. But its not by any stretch capitalism, not even close. Noam Chomsky, in a recent interview with Jacobin magazine, says it quite well. First, from the introduction to the interview:
Following a talk on power, ideology, and US foreign policy last weekend at the New School in New York City, freelance Italian journalist Tommaso Segantini sat down with the eighty-six-year-old to discuss some of the same themes, including how they relate to processes of social change.
For radicals, progress requires puncturing the bubble of inevitability: austerity, for instance, is a policy decision undertaken by the designers for their own purposes. It is not implemented, Chomsky says, because of any economic laws. American capitalism also benefits from ideological obfuscation: despite its association with free markets, capitalism is shot through with subsidies for some of the most powerful private actors. This bubble needs popping too.
The interview ranges widely (feel free to read it all). I want to point to just one section, in which Chomsky characterizes what we insist on calling and defending as capitalism (my emphasis in italics):
Chomsky: Whats called the capitalist system is very far from any model of capitalism or market. Take the fossil fuels industries: there was a recent study by the IMF which tried to estimate the subsidy that energy corporations get from governments. The total was colossal. I think it was around $5 trillion annually. Thats got nothing to do with markets and capitalism.
And the same is true of other components of the so-called capitalist system. By now, in the US and other Western countries, theres been, during the neoliberal period, a sharp increase in the financialization of the economy. Financial institutions in the US had about 40 percent of corporate profits on the eve of the 2008 collapse, for which they had a large share of responsibility.
Theres another IMF study that investigated the profits of American banks, and it found that they were almost entirely dependent on implicit public subsidies. Theres a kind of a guarantee its not on paper, but its an implicit guarantee that if they get into trouble they will be bailed out. Thats called too-big-to-fail.
And the credit rating agencies of course know that, they take that into account, and with high credit ratings financial institutions get privileged access to cheaper credit, they get subsidies if things go wrong and many other incentives, which effectively amounts to perhaps their total profit. The business press tried to make an estimate of this number and guessed about $80 billion a year. Thats got nothing to do with capitalism.
Its the same in many other sectors of the economy. So the real question is, will this system of state capitalism, which is what it is, survive the continued use of fossil fuels? And the answer to that is, of course, no.
By now, theres a pretty strong consensus among scientists who say that a large majority of the remaining fossil fuels, maybe 80 percent, have to be left in the ground if we hope to avoid a temperature rise which would be pretty lethal. And it is not happening. Humans may be destroying their chances for decent survival. It wont kill everybody, but it would change the world dramatically.
If you click that last link and scroll down, youll get his sense of where were headed as a species, in particular with respect to habitability and climate.
But your takeaway should be this. Economic predation by the powerful is not an economic system in any sophisticated sense, any more than organized bullies stealing every childs lunch money the minute she enters the building is a system in any complex sense. Its not even a racket if that term implies misdirection and a multi-step process. Its just boots on the neck and hands in the pocket.
Nor is such theft a market by any definition. Its simply theft, backed by the power of the bullies themselves, their fists, their clubs, and the power of the state that enables them for a cut of the prize.
Feel free to defend (or not) what this system is becoming. Just dont misdescribe it. Its not capitalism by any definition. Nor is it a market, unless a factory farm with a slaughterhouse at one end is a market. Dont confuse others; dont confuse yourself.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)...
Can Sanders Reopen that Closing Window?
In his speech, Tony Benn said not to despair:
In his own piece, though, Noam Chomsky is less optimistic, at least when it comes to the Bernie Sanders electoral solution (my emphasis in italics):
Chomsky: Suppose that Sanders won, which is pretty unlikely in a system of bought elections. He would be alone: he doesnt have congressional representatives, he doesnt have governors, he doesnt have support in the bureaucracy, he doesnt have state legislators; and standing alone in this system, he couldnt do very much. A real political alternative would be across the board, not just a figure in the White House.
It would have to be a broad political movement. In fact, the Sanders campaign I think is valuable its opening up issues, its maybe pressing the mainstream Democrats a little bit in a progressive direction, and it is mobilizing a lot of popular forces, and the most positive outcome would be if they remain after the election.
Its a serious mistake to just to be geared to the quadrennial electoral extravaganza and then go home. Thats not the way changes take place. The mobilization could lead to a continuing popular organization which could maybe have an effect in the long run.
While I agree that a broad movement is needed and helpful, I disagree with Chomsky on these three points:
If Sanders carries through (unlike Barack Obama in 2009) on the opportunity he would have, his election would represent much more than a quadrennial electoral extravaganza. He could, in fact, lead the ongoing political revolution he says he wants.
Bernie Sanders could accomplish an enormous amount without Congress. He wouldnt be acting alone; hed have control of the whole of the Executive Branch or most of it (more on that last later).
Lets look at what Sanders could accomplish without Congress. I want to divide these accomplishments into two groups What I will never do and What I will absolutely do, starting day one. This piece is about the first list, some of the actions you will never see from a successful Bernie Sanders. Ill offer the second list, Ill do this on day one actions, another time....
FURTHERMORE, THE GRASSROOTS WILL BE SUPPORTING A CONGRESS THAT SUPPORTS BERNIE. ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS GET OUT THE VOTE AND LOCATE THE GOOD CANDIDATES AT STATE AND FEDERAL LEVELS.
mother earth
(6,002 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)In his Orwellian September 28, 2015 speech to the United Nations, President Obama said that if democracy had existed in Syria, there never would have been a revolt against Assad. By that, he meant ISIL. Where there is democracy, he said, there is no violence of revolution.
This was his threat to promote revolution, coups and violence against any country not deemed a democracy. In making this hardly veiled threat, he redefined the word in the international political vocabulary. Democracy is the CIAs overthrow of Mossedegh in Iran to install the Shah. Democracy is the overthrow of Afghanistans secular government by the Taliban against Russia. Democracy is the Ukrainian coup behind Yats and Poroshenko. Democracy is Pinochet. It is our bastards, as Lyndon Johnson said with regard to the Latin American dictators installed by U.S. foreign policy.
A century ago the word democracy referred to a nation whose policies were formed by elected representatives. Ever since ancient Athens, democracy was contrasted to oligarchy and aristocracy. But since the Cold War and its aftermath, that is not how U.S. politicians have used the term. When an American president uses the word democracy, he means a pro-American country following U.S. neoliberal policies. No matter if a country is a military dictatorship or the government was brought in by a coup (euphemized as a Color Revolution) as in Georgia or Ukraine. A democratic government has been re-defined simply as one supporting the Washington Consensus, NATO and the IMF. It is a government that shifts policy-making out of the hands of elected representatives to an independent central bank, whose policies are dictated by the oligarchy centered in Wall Street, the City of London and Frankfurt.
Given this American re-definition of the political vocabulary, when President Obama says that such countries will not suffer coups, violent revolution or terrorism, he means that countries safely within the U.S. diplomatic orbit will be free of destabilization sponsored by the U.S. State Department, Defense Department and Treasury. Countries whose voters democratically elect a government or regime that acts independently (or even that simply seeks the power to act independently of U.S. directives) will be destabilized, Syria style, Ukraine style or Chile style under General Pinochet. As Henry Kissinger said, just because a country votes in communists doesnt mean that we have to accept it. It is the style of color revolutions sponsored by the National Endowment for Democracy...
READ IT ALL! ESPECIALLY PUTIN'S REPLY
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/09/michael-hudson-obama-re-defines-democracy-a-country-that-supports-u-s-policy.html
Demeter
(85,373 posts)An Atlanta businessman had a dramatic reaction to his sentence after pleading guilty to paying bribes in 2007 to get investments from Detroit pension funds.
Roy Dixon Jr., 52, screamed Oh, Jesus! Wednesday and stumbled into a federal court lectern in Detroit after learning he will spend three years in prison. Prosecutors have said Dixon paid more than $244,000 in bribes and cost pension funds more than $23 million in a business deal. Defense attorney Edward Wishnow said Dixon was emotional, he was disappointed at the sentence.
He testified for the government in Detroit City Hall corruption investigations. Prosecutors said he gave cash to a pension board trustee and paid for a family vacation.
In all, Detroits pension fund lost more than $95 million in a series of corrupt deals awarded to businessmen who bribed officials with cash, trips, free drinks and other valuable items, according to a report in the Detroit News.
http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2015/10/01/oh-jesus-corrupt-businessman-crumples-after-getting-3-year-prison-sentence/
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)... I spent two years, from 2011 to 2013, interviewing about 200 bankers and financial workers as part of an investigation into banking culture in the City of London after the crash. Not everyone I spoke to had been so terrified in the days and weeks after Lehman collapsed. But the ones who had phoned their families in panic explained to me that what they were afraid of was the domino effect. The collapse of a global megabank such as Lehman could cause the financial system to come to a halt, seize up and then implode. Not only would this mean that we could no longer withdraw our money from banks, it would also mean that lines of credit would stop. As the fund manager George Cooper put it in his book The Origin of Financial Crises: This financial crisis came perilously close to causing a systemic failure of the global financial system. Had this occurred, global trade would have ceased to function within a very short period of time. Remember that this is the age of just-in-time inventory management, Cooper added meaning supermarkets have very small stocks. With impeccable understatement, he said: It is sobering to contemplate the consequences of interrupting food supplies to the worlds major cities for even a few days.
These were the dominos threatening to fall in 2008. The next tile would be hundreds of millions of people worldwide all learning at the same time that they had lost access to their bank accounts and that supplies to their supermarkets, pharmacies and petrol stations had frozen. The TV images that have come to define this whole episode defeated-looking Lehman employees carrying boxes of their belongings through Wall Street have become objects of satire. As if it were only a matter of a few hundred overpaid people losing their jobs: Look at the Masters of the Universe now, brought down to our level!
In reality, those cardboard box-carrying bankers were the beginning of what could very well have been a genuine breakdown of society. Although we did not quite fall off the edge after the crash in the way some bankers were anticipating, the painful effects are still being felt in almost every sector. At this distance, however, seven years on, its hard to see what has changed.
And if nothing has changed, it could all happen again.
* * *
A typical education in the west leaves you with more insight into ancient Rome or Egypt than into our financial system and while there are plenty of books and DVDs for lay people about, say, quantum mechanics, evolution or the human genome, before the crash there was virtually nothing to explain finance to outsiders in accessible language. The City, as John Lanchester put it in his book about the 2008 crash, Whoops!, is still a far-off country of which we know little. As a result, ordinary people trying to form an opinion about finance over the past decades have had very little to go on, and many seem to have latched on to the images provided by films and TV...
/... http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/sep/30/how-the-banks-ignored-lessons-of-crash
Hotler
(11,447 posts)if there was/is an implosion of the banks would credit unions implode also?
I suggest that folks keep some cash on hand if you have some in case the banks lock down. A few hundred or a couple of thousand if you have it. Stock up on canned goods and TP.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Good luck collecting it. That includes bonds. Even with an iron-clad, unbreakable contract, there's going to be chaos and confusion and it could take the rest of your life and that of any children to get it cleared up. Assuming there's any organized medium of exchange set up after.
The next group to suffer is those with paper assets: stocks, real estate investment trusts, all kinds of derivative wealth.
The best deal is: owe nobody, have a property that can feed you and enough toys to make it through the dark ages, enough tools to fix everything that is essential, a good network of like-minded survivors, fresh water, the means to make biodiesel and solar and wind electricity, and be far away from civil strife. Cultivate a doctor, a dentist, a plumber, a carpenter, and perhaps a geek (depends on how far the system breaks down).
I'm hoping for a soft landing, but as Max Keiser says: You can't taper off a Ponzi scheme.
DemReadingDU
(16,000 posts)Good luck playing with those with intermittent electricity. Might be worthwhile to have some solar chargers.
There are always deck of cards and board games for fun.
DemReadingDU
(16,000 posts)If there were a global financial holiday, my guess is that credit unions would be affected too.
Punx
(446 posts)Have to run their transactions through the Federal Reserve system just like other banks or contract with a commercial bank to do so. So if that is shut down they will be affected. (This is from when I was in banking which was quite a while ago but I don't think it has changed).
On the other hand they do have a separate insurance system from the FDIC and are not involved to any degree in the gambling that goes on at the big banks.
Hotler
(11,447 posts)Big fan of the SMW page and the posters here.
The execs at the bank hated Credit Unions. Seemed to think it was unfair that they didn't need to make a profit. They were always trying get laws passed to hamstring them. (To be clear I was a peon there, but you see and hear things)
This was a conservatively run bank at the time, but they were also trying to get the laws changed so they could expand into other areas like insurance. Seems to me they succeeded to our detriment. Early 90's and derivatives were just getting popular.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)WHAT? ALL THOSE CHIRPY HAPPY REPORTS ARE PHONY?
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/wall-streets-expectations-american-job-112200361.html
On Friday morning, we'll find out how many new jobs the US economy created in September.
And Wall Street's forecast is the most downbeat its been since March 2014.
Via Bloomberg, here's what Wall Street is expecting:
Nonfarm payrolls: +200,000
Unemployment rate: 5.1%
Average hourly earnings, month-over-month: +0.2%
Average hourly earnings, year-over-year: +2.4%
Average weekly hours worked: 34.6
In August, the unemployment rate plunged to a new seven-year low of 5.1% while the labor force participation rate also fell. In August, the economy added 173,000 jobs, fewer than forecast, but economists estimate that job growth will be revised higher on Friday (as have most August prints in the last 15 years).
And most of the reason for the downbeat look for September is manufacturing.
"Much of the slowdown in hiring has been in the mining and manufacturing sectors," notes HSBC's James Pomeroy to clients.
And according to TD Securities, the sector is in an outright recession in the US. The weakness in manufacturing, however, is not just confined to the US but global, and according to Morgan Stanley's Ted Wieseman, uncertainty about the global economy and a stronger dollar could slow new hiring.
The bright spot in expectations is a forecast breakout in wage growth during September. Wall Street expects year-over-year hourly earnings growth of 2.4%, which would be a high for this economic cycle, according to Citi's Steve Englander.
Englander notes that pressures for higher wages from across America's labor market mean that workers are growing more reluctant to be employed at prevailing rates.
And so after years of sideways wage growth, a breakout in wages could be the big news out of Friday's report.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)JPMorgan Chase & Co is set to pay almost a third of a $1.86 billion settlement to resolve claims that a dozen big banks conspired to limit competition in the credit-default swaps market, Bloomberg reported.
JPMorgan is paying $595 million, Bloomberg said, citing people who asked not to be identified because the firms haven't disclosed how they're splitting costs. (http://bloom.bg/1WAm3d5)
Morgan Stanley, Barclays Plc and Goldman Sachs Group Inc are paying about $230 million, $175 million and $164 million, respectively, the report said.
Goldman, JPMorgan and Barclays declined to comment. Morgan Stanley was not immediately available to comment on the report.
Credit default swaps are contracts that let investors buy protection to hedge against the risk that corporate or sovereign debt issuers will not meet their payment obligations.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)DID SHE REFUSE TO GRASS ON OTHER BANKSTERS?
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-02/mortgage-executive-who-took-rap-for-crisis-prepares-her-appeal?cmpid=yhoo
Rebecca Mairone scarcely deserves a mention in the annals of finance, except for this: Shes the only executive of a major U.S. mortgage lender found liable for her part in the 2008 financial crisis.
Mairone was chief operating officer for a division of Countrywide Financial Corp., the California giant that came to symbolize the excesses of the subprime era. While top executives there and elsewhere walked away, Mairone, now 48, was targeted by federal prosecutors. In October 2013, a Manhattan jury found her liable for misrepresenting the quality of mortgages her company sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff called her testimony implausible and slapped her with a $1 million fine. Bloggers said she helped destroy the U.S. economy and should be jailed or worse.
Two years later, Mairone is heading back to court in an attempt to overturn that ruling and restore her reputation. As she has all along, she maintains she did nothing wrong. Years after the housing bust, her case reminds Americans yet again that not a single senior executive has been held accountable for a mortgage meltdown that cost millions of people their homes, livelihoods and savings.
Shes not uniquely responsible, said Brad Miller, a Democratic congressman from North Carolina from 2003 to 2013 who served on the House Financial Services Committee. But the question isnt whether there shouldve been a claim brought against Rebecca Mairone. Its why werent a lot more brought?
Demeter
(85,373 posts)The Chinese billionaire using his personal fortune to help fund a $50 billion Nicaraguan challenger to the Panama Canal has crashed into the bitter reality of equity markets in the worlds second-largest economy.
Telecommunications entrepreneur Wang Jing, 42, was one of the worlds 200 richest people with $10.2 billion at the peak of the Chinese markets in June, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. His net worth has since fallen to $1.1 billion.
His 84 percent drop so far in 2015 is the worst recorded by the index, which provides a daily ranking of the worlds 400 richest people. Ivan Glasenberg, chief executive officer of Baar, Switzerland-based Glencore Plc, had the second-biggest percentage decline, falling 66 percent to $1.8 billion.
Wang owns 35 percent of publicly traded Beijing Xinwei Telecom Technology Group Co., which has tumbled along with Chinas equity markets. The end of a lockup on 51 percent of its shares on Sept. 10 triggered a further decline thats pushed Xinwei to a 57 percent drop this year. He pledged Xinwei shares valued at $2.4 billion in July that were removed from his net worth calculation...
MORE LOSERS AT LINK AND VIDEO CLIP
Demeter
(85,373 posts)I wish the Kid were a mermaid, and lived in water....it would be so much cleaner that way. And easier to keep clean.