Economy
Related: About this forumGreenspan Says Too Big To Fail Problem 'Is Getting Worse, Not Better'
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/15/greenspan-too-big-to-fail-worse-better_n_2884001.htmlWASHINGTON, D.C. -- Former Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan testifies during a Senate hearing in 2011
Greenspan Says Too Big To Fail Problem 'Is Getting Worse, Not Better'
The Huffington Post
By Caroline Fairchild
Posted: 03/15/2013 12:07 pm EDT | Updated: 03/15/2013 1:03 pm EDT
Alan Greenspan, a former Federal Reserve chairman, told CNBC on Thursday morning that the too big to fail problem is getting worse, not better.
Greenspan, who was chairman of the Fed during the credit bubble that ultimately crashed the global economy and is widely blamed for that crisis, said that The Dodd-Frank Act is not working.
Dodd-Frank was passed to prevent a similar financial crisis.
(What) we ought to do is to allow banks to fail, go through the standard Chapter 11 type of process of liquidation, and allow the markets to adjust accordingly, said the 87-year-old Greenspan. That has worked for a very long time.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)secondvariety
(1,245 posts)You and your Randian buddies are to blame.
perdita9
(1,144 posts)A lot of what went wrong was directly your fault.
Enjoy your retirement and be glad you're not in jail.
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)bulloney
(4,113 posts)Why can't the media gerbils--just once--call out these losers when they go around making such statements?
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)I don't remember the details.
Orrex
(63,215 posts)Response to Orrex (Reply #7)
UnrepentantLiberal This message was self-deleted by its author.
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)That Wikipedia is a right fine website.
truth2power
(8,219 posts)ever thought he had anything important to say demonstrates the limitations of their intellect. But we already knew that.
Matt Taibbi's description, from your Wikipedia link:
Matt certainly has a way with words.
And I couldn't resist this, since I've been reading a lot of Stiglitz lately:
Along with him having been an acolyte of Ayn Rand, that about does it for me.
westerebus
(2,976 posts)Festivito
(13,452 posts)His attempt to control inflation concentrated on reducing available jobs. It did control inflation, but with the side effect of destroying the middle class.
I'm pretty sure he supported the "banking crisis" that starts with CMO/CDOs and CDSs being sold with bribes, er, ah, payments up front. The April 2004 SEC decision allowing the five top banks to change their regulated 10% rule lead to "bailouts" and our current world-wide banking crisis -- except in Iceland, Norway and Sweden who kicked their bankers in their fat asses and put new people in charge. (The opposite of what the United States, Spain, and Greece did.)
UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)dawg
(10,624 posts)Right now, it's the exact same time as the hands on that stopped clock! I guess that happens every once in a while.