Latin America
Related: About this forumShould Argentina Now Pay the Ransom to Its Hostage-Takers?
Should Argentina Now Pay the Ransom to Its Hostage-Takers?
Posted on February 12, 2016 by Yves Smith
By Jeremy Smith, a Co-Drector of PRIME and a barrister, and Jorge Vilches (jorgevilches@fibertel.com.ar), a financial op-ed columnist based in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Originally published at PRIME Economics
When it comes to dealing with hostage-taking and ransom-paying, governments always say publicly we will never negotiate with terrorists and criminals, because it sets a bad precedent, and encourages other bad guys to do yet more hostage-taking and ransom-demanding.
But this logic does not seem to apply in the field of sovereign debt and vulture funds. The advice, in this field, is always do the deal, pay up, however unfair the situation and however usurious the amount. [1]
So with Argentina and the ransom demanded from its people by the US vulture funds (which themselves, let us recall, never lent a single dollar to Argentina).
More:
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2016/02/should-argentina-now-pay-the-ransom-to-its-hostage-takers.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)They didnt seem to mind spending the money so they should repay it.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)likely to get answered. What you will hear is something to the effect that 'the government that took out those loans wasn't truly responsive to the people's wishes (whatever that means) so the government now has no obligation to repay those loans. In addition, because some of the original bondholders cashed out for pennies on the dollar, the people that didn't cash out and the people who bought up the original bonds should not be entitled to collect on them, either. I know - it doesn't make sense to me, either.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Just dont complain when future loans are at a 15% rate.