Latin America
Related: About this forumChavism Loses a Battle: Can It Recover and Rectify?
December 10, 2015
Chavism Loses a Battle: Can It Recover and Rectify?
by Chris Gilbert
Caracas.
Chavism received a serious blow in the parliamentary elections this last Sunday, December 6. The strength of the blow is such that the movement is still reeling. The Venezuelan opposition, loosely organized in an electoral bloc called the Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD), achieved not just a majority of seats in the National Assembly but also the qualified majorities needed to call for referendums, initiate constitutional reform, and reorganize the judicial branch. The long-term consequences of this setback, which are likely grave and possibly disastrous, will depend on the Chavist movements capacity to both maintain internal order and also renovate itself.
Faced with these electoral results, President Nicolás Maduro has been among the first to call for self-critique and renovation in Chavism. This is something the late leader Hugo Chávez tried to launch with the 3Rs campaign(Revision, Rectification, Re-impulsing) some five years ago. Yet serious self-criticism has always eluded the Bolivarian movement. More than an ethical issue, it is a problem of organization: who will critique whom and with what force? History has shown the difficulty in balancing democracy and centralism within the lefts universally-subscribed framework of democratic centralism. Effective critique usually comes only when a new internal force emerges, such as the Chinese Red Guards of the mid-1960s, typically supported by some fraction of the old guard. No such thing has ever happenned in Chavism.
Self-criticism also has to face facts and interpret them without prejudice. The key fact is that Sundays well-attended elections saw two million more voters opting for the opposition bloc than for Chavism. Is this because, as President Maduro has said, there is an economic war against Venezuela and against his government? At best the explanation is partial. An economic war, such as the ones carried out against Salvador Allendes Chile or Revolutionary Cuba, is not necessarily successful. If Cuba has resisted more than 50 years and with fewer resources, then the Venezuelan governments conduct facing its own economic war must be erroneous. The key factor is surely that, despite the governments constant alerts about economic aggressions, it has never proposed a coherent strategy to defeat them. That would mean clearly defining the enemy, locating its headquarters, and then organizing actions to attain a strategic victory.
The fact that Maduro has proposed no such strategy is likely the main reason that so many working-class voters, including those in historically-Chavist sectors such as the famed 23 Enero barrio of Caracas, voted against Chavism last Sunday. The Venezuelan people have shown their resilience and loyalty in situations that were far more grueling such as the Oil Stoppage of 2002-3, but when there is no end in sight because the leadership lacks a strategic plan, then it is almost impossible for leaders to preserve credibility and followers to maintain faith.
During the upcoming year, Venezuelas serious economic problems, which are structural and have much to do with the global economic crisis, will continue, despite the Democratic Roundtables false promises that voting in their favor would lead to a rapid resolution. This means that 2016 will be marked by a discursive battle over who is responsible in a split-power situation for the persistence of the economic difficulties. Here Chavism will start out with a disadvantage, since as the recent voting result indicates, it is presently held responsible. Yet as the oppositions false promises come to light along with its internal division and incoherence, to say nothing of its profoundly fascist and genocidal tendencies it will come under greater scrutiny and criticism by the masses.
More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/12/10/chavism-loses-a-battle-can-it-recover-and-rectify/