Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,609 posts)
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:01 PM Jul 2012

Latin America Moves Left and Forward

July 18, 2012
Foro de Sao Paulo
Latin America Moves Left and Forward
by CARMELO RUIZ-MARRERO

The Foro de Sao Paulo (FSP), a forum that brings together most of the Latin American left, had its 18th meeting in the Venezuelan city of Caracas on July 4-6. In attendance were representatives of practically all of the Foro’s member organizations, including El Salvador’s FMLN, Nicaragua’s Sandinistas, Guatemala’s URNG (all three of them former guerrilla groups), the Cuban Communist Party, Ecuador’s Alianza PAIS, Uruguay’s Frente Amplio, Bolivia’s Movement Toward Socialism and the Puerto Rico Socialist Front, as well as leftist and socialist political parties from countries like Mexico, Costa Rica, Panama, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Barbados and Argentina.

The host country’s left pulled out all stops in helping to organize the event. Countless youth volunteers of the ruling party- president Hugo Chavez’s PSUV- looked after every detail of logistics and protocol, and the local communist party, the PCV, was also out in force. There was also a substantial number of observers and dignitaries from other parts of the world, including Russia, China, Vietnam, Saharaui, Lebanon, Palestine, France, Spain and Greece. VIP’s included Nobel laureate Rigoberta Menchú from Guatemala, and writers Ignacio Ramonet and Atilio Boron, who sat in places of honor near president Chavez at the closing activity.

Brazil’s delegation, which included the ruling Workers’ Party (PT) and the Communist Party (PcdoB, now celebrating its 90 years), had a commanding presence in Caracas. The PT was indeed the main driving force behind the FSP’s founding, and the meeting’s proceedings were presided over by the extremely capable Brazilian political strategist Valter Pomar, who is not only the Foro’s executive secretary but also a member of the PT’s top leadership.

Currently one of the world’s leading economies, Brazil has a gross domestic product dozens of times the size of any of its neighbors’. The country’s political and economic shadow looms over all South America. The PT has won the last three presidential elections- in the first two of these the winning candidate was former factory worker and labor organizer Luiz Inacio “Lula” Da Silva, and the current president is the former guerrilla and political prisoner Dilma Roussef. It must be regarded as the most important political institution of the Latin American left and one of the single most important political parties in the hemisphere. Lula fully intended to come to Caracas but could not do so due to health problems. He did, however, send a video greeting in which he expressed support for president Chavez’s reelection bid.

More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/07/18/latin-america-moves-left-and-forward/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
1. Very smart of Latin American countries to form these kinds of alliances. At least that part of the
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:09 PM
Jul 2012

world is not ignoring history and hopefully as a result, it will be more difficult to repeat it.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
2. Quite an interesting article! Thanks for posting it!
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 02:52 PM
Jul 2012

Puerto Rico's Carmelo Ruiz Marrero covers a lot of ground in this article. of necessity. The forum itself includes the entirety of Latin America--participants and issues--including delegations from all the electorally successful leftist political parties, as enumerated in the first paragraph. These are delegations of political parties whose leaders are now presidents of their countries--something no distant observer could have predicted a decade ago, especially given the disgusting disinformation and "black holing" of information in the U.S.-dominated, corpo-fascist world press.

What has happened in Latin America is an enormous and, to the disinformed, seemingly miraculous, triumph of the left, in countries that only a decade ago were wallowing in misery--vast, endemic and seemingly hopeless poverty, transglobal corporate looting of every kind (of resources, of finances, of public works, of workers) and fake democracy--rule by the rich supported by the U.S. It seems hardly possible that Latin Americans have reversed all of these negatives so substantially over so short a time, but that is what they have done--as all indicators show. Latin Americans have voted themselves a "New Deal" and have put we victims of transglobal corporate monstrosities and war profiteers, here in the north, to shame, as to our fraud-ridden election system, in which it is simply not possible, any more, to elect an "FDR"-type president and a "New Deal" congress.

Not possible. That is the lamentable condition of our once great democracy. And what the rich and the corporate are doing in our so-called election system, on the financial side--outright buying elections--in collusion with the corpo-fascist media, is not the half of it, by any means. The vote counting system itself has been monumentally comprised, and is now run largely (70%) by one, private, far-rightwing connected corporation--ES&S, which bought out Diebold--using 'TRADE SECRET' code--code that the public is forbidden to review--in all the voting machines in the U.S., with virtually no audit-recount controls.

Election of an "FDR" today, in the U.S.--a da Silva, a Rousseff, a Chavez, a Morales--is NOT POSSIBLE. Reform has been thoroughly blockaded. And, until, we, the people of the U.S., address that monumental problem--the loss of vote counting in the PUBLIC VENUE--in all our local jurisdictions (where the initial fraud occurs--the purchase of these voting machines, laws against public review, "privatization" of the whole voting process), we will continue to see government "of, by and for" the 1%, no matter which party is in power. The awful silence of our own party leaders on this FUNDAMENTAL democratic issue--public vote counting--tells us all we need to know about their fear of, or collusion with, 'TRADE SECRET' vote counting.

Carmelo Ruiz Marrero points out that there were almost no U.S. delegates to this forum.

---

"I must have been the only delegate in Caracas that noticed the total absence of Americans, which says plenty about the provincialism of most American leftists and progressives. But on the other hand, it was also evident that the Americans were not missed at all, nobody bemoaned their absence. Latin America is increasingly looking south. Only the right wing and ruling classes are looking north for answers and help in these changing times." --from the OP

---

i'm not sure if I agree with his analysis as to why there were so few U.S. delegates ("the provincialism of most American leftists and progressives"). i would need more information. There have been substantial U.S. delegations to other kinds of leftist forums in LatAm. And the individuals and groups (labor, environmental, religious, etc.) who came together in the U.S., in Seattle '99, for instance, and for subsequent large protests against "neoliberal" policies and institutions--including huge protests against U.S. wars, and recent protests against "Wall Street"--can hardly be described as "provincial." Indeed, keen awareness of global issues is characteristic of these groups.

One of my guesses about this would be that U.S. leftist groups have the enormous problem of U.S. wars and war profiteers--an evil that may be evident in LatAm (most notably in the corrupt, failed, murderous U.S. "war on drugs&quot but that is largely not generated BY LatAm. U.S. wars and war profiteering are a uniquely U.S. evil, established in its current monstrous form by the Bush Junta, and largely supported by the current Democratic Party establishment. The LatAm left has to deal with it in theory--opposing U.S. wars as a policy statement--and as to the impacts of U.S. militarism on LatAm but U.S. leftists have to deal with being at the very heart of the Empire, where all this murder, mayhem, oppression and grief is generated. The continuation of these U.S. policies under Obama--and in addition the continuation of policies of environmental plundering, corporate rule of medical care, banksterism, looting of "the commons" and more--may be preoccupying the left here and consuming all of its time and resources.

I can't imagine that such groups are not interested in the LatAm left and in leftist solidarity. It is simply not true. LatAm issues were and are at the heart of the U.S. peace and justice movement. And I certainly do not share the writer's casual and even contemptuous dismissal of the U.S. left as "not being missed" at this forum. The writer instead should have inquired into WHY. Did the forum's organizers share this contemptuous attitude and not make efforts to include U.S. delegations? Did the writer ask anybody--among the forum participants or its organizers--what THEIR view was, as to U.S. participants? Were they deliberately excluded? Did the U.S. government place obstacles in their way? What was going on with this (and how true was it--just as to numbers)?

The writer uses this sally against the U.S. left to make the point that the LatAm left is now "looking south" (as opposed to the right, which looks "north&quot . That is an important point and should not be used divisively as to the common causes and solidarity of the left, south and north.

I also don't like its bullying tone. Bullies pick on the weak. The U.S. left is weak, for sure, but the U.S. population has also been the target of unprecedented forms of manipulation and control. To spit on the left here as "provincial" is unfair, as well as untrue. It's like kicking a schoolyard victim when she's down. Why not instead offer sympathy and help (say, boxing lessons!)?

Fortunately, that is a rare low point in the article. It is otherwise well worth reading. Our people are almost universally denied this kind of information about the left in LatAm, except for those willing to hunt for alternatives to the corpo-fascist press.

As the article points out, this socialist forum--the Foro de Sao Paulo (FSP)--is well aware that Latin America's "New Deal" is not complete and faces grave threats from U.S. opposition to both social justice and democracy in LatAm--from fraudulent elections (Mexico, Haiti, Honduras), fake "constitutional crises" used to mount rightwing coups (Honduras, Paraguay) and outright murder and mayhem supported by U.S. tax dollars (Colombia, Honduras, Mexico)--among the tactics being used by the U.S. in collusion with rightwing elites to serve transglobal corporate monsters and war profiteers.

LatAm's left also has some fundamental conflicts--the biggest one being economic development vs. Mother Earth--that we can be sure the CIA is looking at (if not actively involved in) for "divide and conquer" purposes. The forum acknowledges this conflict. It is, at first glance, insoluble. How do you create prosperity for all without further ravaging Mother Earth? NO modern society has solved this problem and it may be that it IS insoluble and that the human race is heading toward its own demise (at breakneck speed, it seems). I am very glad to see the forum's comments on this conflict. If it has solutions, I think they will come from LatAm (where I know they are being worked on), precisely because of the rise of leftist democracy there and its expansion of free speech and civil rights. That discussion--development vs Mother Earth--has been squashed here, and environmental advances in Europe are under assault. I don't know much of what is going on in Africa and Asia, as to environmental progress--what little I know looks very bad, indeed (especially China). So, Latin America seems to be the only place of hope, as to ideas and action on saving Mother Earth, and its awesome leftist democracy movement is WHY I have such hope. Only where there is serious, immediate potential for casting off Corporate Rule is there serious potential for saving the planet. In Latin America, casting off Corporate Rule is not only potential; it is in progress.

Bacchus4.0

(6,837 posts)
4. the document cites the Belo Monte dam and the cross continent highways
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 03:35 PM
Jul 2012

I hate to burst your imaginary bubble on environmental progress in Latin America.

I am not so optimistic about an environmental revolution originating from Latin America. Words on a piece of paper don't mean much when you are building superhighways, mines, dams, new oil exploration, have lax environmental enforcement, discharge runoff and waste water directly into rivers, logging, and slash and burn agriculture.

its going to take more than "declarations" to confront those issues. Developed countries have high environmental standards comparatively. Lack of environmental standards and low labor costs (and standards) are reasons those corporations you despise move overseas. Overall, environmental conscienceness is greater in developed countries. Environmental standards and enforcement is much more rigorous in developed countries. Many nations in Latin America have environmental laws and procedures (mostly modeled after US and European procedures) that are openly ignored.

On the other hand, consumption by developed countries results in environmental degradation of undeveloped countries no question about it.

fortunately Latin America has vast amounts of undeveloped land, unfortunately it is being destroyed bit by bit.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
5. All environmental advances in the U.S. came on the heels of the "New Deal" which...
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 05:07 AM
Jul 2012

...expanded the financial well-being of millions of Americans, creating a vast middle class and upwardly mobile poor, and sparked all of the vast improvements in civil rights and public participation that culminated in the 1960s and 1970s. The environmental movement was born of that era and essentially came to a halt with Reagan, whose Secretary of the Interior was the one who said, "You've seen one redwood, you've seen them all."* Ever since Reagan, we have been galloping back to the Dark Ages on the environment. The EPA today is a joke. Corporations rule. Environmental regulation is an empty husk.

My point is that the social, economic and political conditions for the kind of environmentalism needed now--to quite literally prevent the DEATH of the planet--exist, or are in the process of being created, in Latin America and almost nowhere else, certainly not here. And in addition to leftist policies of pouring resources into education, medical care, upward mobility for the poor, good wages and decent benefits, high employment, high levels of public participation and other requirements of creating a large middle class--the basic necessary condition for creating good environmental policy, Latin America has a large and politically active Indigenous population whose religions are based on reverence for Mother Earth and a large campesino (small farmer) population which is also politically active and opposed to corporate agribusiness and its poisonous activities.

Latin America doesn't have the solutions; nobody does--not yet anyway--but they are facing the crisis of development vs the environment in a far different world than the one in which the environmental movement (as a widespread phenomenon) was first born. NOBODY KNEW, in the '60s, '70s or '80s, that the redwood forest and other forests are needed as "carbon sinks" and that the size of the trees is directly related to the effectiveness of the forest cover in absorbing carbon emissions. (Thus, ancient redwood trees--which grow to 20 and more feet in circumference and 200 to 300 feet tall, over the course of 500 to 2000 years--are much more valuable organisms for preventing global warming than forests with measly ten or twenty year old trees or clearcut forests where there are no trees, or merely shrubbery, or plantations of baby trees.

There were many other reasons to protect forests, back then--preserving biodiversity (birds, animals, insects, fish) and protecting clean water sources, but the stakes are much higher now--as to what we now KNOW about the Earth's ecosystem. Forests are basically the "lungs of the planet" and we have destroyed about 80% of the planet's "lungs" over the last hundred years!

And that, of course, is only ONE aspect of the picture of Earth's destruction. The others include vast toxic pollution from industrial processes and substances, vast loss of biodiversity in every kind of ecosystem, pollution of the oceans, areas where the ocean is now dead, loss of fresh water sources, catastrophic melting of the polar ice caps, vast losses of wild land, nuclear power disasters of various kinds (and more to come) and so on.

Such impacts--impacts that are literally destroying the world we live in at an alarming pace--require bold, vibrant politics, bold, vibrant thinking and discussion and bold, vibrant, politically active populations to solve. Latin America, inspired by goals of social justice and sovereignty, are having the kinds of bold, vibrant discussions that we are not having, because OUR democracy is nearly mordant. And that mordancy started with Reagan.

Latin America, thus far, has NOT been a major contributor to this global catastrophe. The most developed and most highly industrialized societies are far and away the major culprits. BUT, Latin America is most definitely headed in the direction of massive development, at the same time that they are making leaps forward in social justice and democracy. The difference between us and them is that THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT IT. As humans, that is how we begin to solve problems. And if there is sufficient democracy and openness and responsive government, problems do get addressed as the result of open discussion. Our government is positively barricaded AGAINST such discussion. Their purpose is to fend off "environmentalists" on behalf of corporate interests-and conscienceless profiteers. We have only to look at the Alaska pipeline, the BP oil spill, "fracking" and Fukushima, to know this. "We the People"--who have always been 70% to 80% in favor of strong environmental regulation--have no influence whatsoever on government policy.

What I see in Latin America is the potential for discussion to lead to solutions and action. The conditions are there. Democracy is alive in Latin America. Government leaders actually listen to people. Some leaders are acutely attuned to the world's environmental crisis--Evo Morales, for instance. Others are more labor organizer types like Lula da Silva--their emphasis on job creation and spreading the wealth. They ALL have the problems of development vs the environment before them, and, unlike the "New Deal" leaders here, who spread the wealth here through the '70s, they KNOW what's at stake as to our planet's ecosystem. They are well-informed.

------------------

*(And that was no idle remark or stupid misspeak. It was POLICY--and not the least consequence of that rightwing/corporate policy, fronted by the fake stupid Neanderthals of Reaganism, was the utter decimation of the ancient redwood forest in California, of which less than 5% remains today. The redwood forest region is now severely depressed because THE TREES ARE GONE. No more timber--no more timber jobs. And that wealth is all gone--sucked right out of the region by rapacious timber corporations. It is an excruciating dilemma for leaders with a conscience--for progressive leaders like those in LatAm who know what is going down, and are torn between the desire for well-paying jobs--however short term they may be--and the desire to use their country's resources to benefit their people, on the one hand, and local and world environmental crisis, on the other. But at least they ARE torn--and out of that pain, solutions can be born. Our leaders don't have that conflict. And, lately, they don't seem to give a crap about jobs either. Outsourcing should have been banned long ago--if we had any kind of democracy left. It is absolutely traitorous.)

Bacchus4.0

(6,837 posts)
6. thats not even close to being true. Teddy Roosevelt preserved parklands and forests
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 11:32 AM
Jul 2012

long before the new deal. The height of the industrial age from the early 1900s into the 70s was a poor time for the environment. The National Environmental Policy Act actually was under Nixon. the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act put teeth into environmental protection. All of those came well after the New Deal. Latin America lacks effective enforcement of environmental protection statutes for the most part.

Redwoods may indeed be the among the most efficient plants for carbon sequestration but the range of redwoods trees is quite limited compared to say the Amazon basin or most other types of forests actually.

Talking about it is fine but action is needed. You can't simply say how precious Mother Earth is and then go on to support highways and mines completely ignoring Mother Earth.

what you fear about the redwood forests being depleted is happening all through out latin america to tropcial hardwood forests.

The US has much tighter environmental laws and regulations. When latin american nations convert their rhetoric into action in regards to the environment, then we can talk.

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
7. Yup, the environment was a Republican issue UNTIL REAGAN...
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 07:42 AM
Jul 2012

...at which time the right, in service to monstrous corporations and war profiteers, took over the Republican Party. This leaden weight on our political system has resulted in weaker and weaker and now NON-enforcement of environmental laws and NATIONAL STUPIDITY of suicidal proportions as to respect for science. ROUTINELY scientists are overridden on the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act and numerous other national and state laws that were written and passed to prevent loss of biodiversity, loss of forests, loss of clean water, pollution and other corporate assaults on Earth's ecosystem.

Any environmental regulatory system that permits what happened to the redwood forest is not worth the paper it is written on. But that is just ONE EXAMPLE of the impact of the far right on denying the American people effective environmental regulation in the far right's slavish service to transglobal corporations. We are now suffering catastrophic loss of high end animal species (forget the lower end--insects, lichen, etc), catastrophic weather disruption, catastrophic levels of pollution, catastrophic levels of toxins in the food chain, catastrophic loss of wild lands and biological connectivity to over-development and "privatization", catastrophic oil spills, deteriorating nuclear power plants which may just finish us off for good and on and on.

The environmental laws of the 1960s and 1970s were passed BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE HAD CLOUT IN OUR DEMOCRACY in those days and INSISTED ON IT. It was nearly universally supported and largely a-political. And it was a characteristic of the massive American middle class that WAS CREATED BY THE "NEW DEAL" to insist on environmental regulation because they had the financial security, education and leisure to, a) learn about the environment, and b) DO SOMETHING about the environment. Their wishes have been defied by the corporate takeover of government which has turned this regulatory system into an ugly farce just as it has turned our democracy itself into an ugly farce, with the 'privatization' of vote counting, for godssakes, and horribly unjust war, just two examples of it.

My point about Latin America is that they are where we were in the 1960s and 1970s as to REAL democracy PLUS they are creating real democracies (which of necessity must be based on sharing the wealth) in the era of global warming and the potential death of planet Earth*. That is why I have hope that they will come up with the solutions and, as far as I can see, they are the only region on earth that might do so.

---------------------

*(The World Wildlife fund gives us 50 years--50 years to the DEATH of planet earth!--at present levels of consumption, pollution and deforestation. (And that was about five years ago.) Humans need to develop a new way of life or we are done for. Where are those new ideas going to come from? And how are they going to be implemented in the face of transglobal corporate power?)

Bacchus4.0

(6,837 posts)
3. the declaration.
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 03:15 PM
Jul 2012

The Caracas Declaration also included expressions of solidarity with the Haitian and Paraguayan people in their struggles against oppression, with the Colombia peace process, and with presidents Correa of Ecuador and Morales of Bolivia. The document also declares support for Palestinian self-determination, for the release of Puerto Rican political prisoner Oscar Lopez, who has been incarcerated in the US for 31 years, opposition to military intervention in Syria and Iran, and has statements on other issues such as the environment and discrimination against women. With regards to decolonization, it calls for the return of the Falklands islands to Argentina, the self-determination and independence of Puerto Rico, the decolonization of the French and Dutch Guyanas, and support for the brave struggle of Northwest Africa’s Saharaui. Valter Pomar presented Ecuador’s chancellor Ricardo Patino, who was in Caracas heading his country’s delegation, with an FSP declaration calling on his country to give asylum to Wikileaks’ Julian Assange.
---------------

Note the declaration calls for the "self-determination and independence of Puerto Rico"; but no self-determination for the Falklands.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»Latin America Moves Left ...