Latin America
Related: About this forum“Colectivos are Synonymous with Organization, Not Violence”
Colectivos are Synonymous with Organization, Not Violence
By Clodovaldo Hérnandez
March 22, 2014
Clodovaldo Hérnandez, Venezuelan writer and politician, talks about the criminalization of grassroots organizing, the right-wing strategy behind it, and goes on to explain why the fate of the revolution rests in the communal councils in an interview with newspaper Ciudad CCS, from March 10th, 2014.
Ciudad CCS: Recently there has been a criminalization of popular organizing. Just like in 2002 with the Bolivarian Circles, today theres an effort to attribute recent violence to the colectivos, referring to them as armed paramilitary groups. Will this become part of public opinion, as it did back then?
Clodovaldo Hérnandez: It has already become widespread. We are seeing it in the isolated but intense demonstrations of hate that have sprung up in certain municipalities of the country. This is part of a political culture belonging to a sector of the Venezuelan opposition. I maintain the belief, perhaps out of innocence, that it represents a minority. I know many people who are not chavistas and still they do not think this way, but there is a nucleus within the opposition that is truly and literally fascist.
But, will this label of violence affect the revolutions supporters?
In some cases the social base of chavismo has been vulnerable to that rhetoric. In fact, Im convinced that in April of 2002 the mass opposition marches that we saw were possible because the fear factor was manipulated very skillfully. The idea was planted in many that you must fear chavismo, for it is fundamentally violent and criminal. That psychological threat has followed us, and we havent been able to defeat it entirely. I believe well have to contend with it until the peoples will for peace prevails.
Does the campaign satanizing collectives in some way wear down the people who make them up?
Absolutely not. The same thing happens within the collectives as within chavismo in general. Whenever these fascist assaults present themselves; People draw together and unite. The recent antichavista activities, the most virulent to date, have only inspired us to deepen our efforts to reclaim the work of our collectives and communities. The collectives play a role in their barrios that no one else can, encouraging political education, cultural expression and sports. Many of the Bolivarian governments policies, for example the missions, can only be carried out thanks to the existence of these collectives.
What is the true relationship between collectives and firearms?
The reality of it is that there is no identification between the collectives and firearms. I believe that both the commander Chavez, and president Nicolas Maduro each made their position unequivocally clear; any person who raises weapons in alleged defense of the Bolivarian Revolution is out of line, and outside the limits of the law. The monopoly of legitimate violence is exercised by the state alone, as a democratic obligation. We have to make an effort not to allow these false judgments to take root, because collectives are not synonymous with weapons and violence, but with organization and grassroots movement, culture, and of working alongside the Bolivarian government to resolve concrete problems in the communities.
More:
http://zcomm.org/znetarticle/colectivos-are-synonymous-with-organization-not-violence/
Flatulo
(5,005 posts)doesn't ride around on motorcycles terrorizing people and firing into crowds.
Bacchus4.0
(6,837 posts)to act violently
Flatulo
(5,005 posts)people who are enjoying a nice skim with the current regime and don't want the free ride to end. The 'what's mine is mine and what's yours is mine' kind of folks.
Flatulo
(5,005 posts)Response to Flatulo (Reply #2)
Bacchus4.0 This message was self-deleted by its author.