Obama wrong to isolate Venezuela
Obama wrong to isolate Venezuela
By Oliver Stone and Mark Weisbrot | March 22, 2014
The George W. Bush administration had a stated policy of trying to isolate Venezuela from its neighbors, and the strategy ended up isolating Washington instead. President Obama, in his first meeting with hemispheric leaders in Trinidad in 2009, promised to turn a new page. But today, his administration finds itself even more isolated than that of his predecessor, and for much the same reasons.
Consider the lopsided vote on Venezuela at the Organization of American States earlier this month. Not only did the OAS reject Washington’s attempt to get the organization to intervene in Venezuela, but to add insult to injury, 29 countries passed a resolution expressing their solidarity with the government of President Nicolás Maduro, with only 3 against. It is hard to imagine a more resounding diplomatic defeat in a body where the US government still has a disproportionate influence.
The Obama administration seems surrealistically unaware that this is a different hemisphere than it was 15 years ago. Governments representing the majority of Latin America are now from the left, including Brazil, Argentina, Ecuador, Bolivia, Uruguay, and Venezuela in South America and El Salvador and Nicaragua in Central America. These governments emphatically reject Washington’s depiction of the recent events in Venezuela as a government trying to “repress peaceful protesters.” Instead, they share Maduro’s view that the protests are an attempt to overthrow a democratically elected government, which has been the stated goal of the protest movement’s leadership from the beginning. Even President Michelle Bachelet of Chile, who is reluctant to criticize Washington, used the word “destabilization” to describe the protests. These governments see that Washington is using its muscle to support this effort.
They have seen this movie before. In 2002, the Bush administration “provided training, institution building, and other support to individuals and organizations understood to be actively involved in the military coup” that briefly overthrew then-President Hugo Chávez, according to the State Department. After the coup failed, Washington stepped up funding to opposition groups, which has continued to this day.
More:
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/03/21/obama-wrong-isolate-venezuela/XCiOn7e7R4M7pSq93J5LeI/story.html
= new reply since forum marked as read
See, it's actually a coalition between Álvaro Uribe, the US, and the CIA who have actually paid millions to students to start revolting against the government. All the supposed reasons that the protests are happening, like the food scarcity, the out-of-control crime rate, the yearly inflation rate of over 50%, the total cease of national production, the blackouts that leave half the country without power, etc., are all fabricated by right-wing controlled media, and if there's video footage incriminating National Guard and pro-government colectivos armed to the teeth who are repressing and killing protesters, they're actually hired goons by the Venezuelan Neo-Fascist Movement to dress up like those individuals to pin the blame on the government.
I think that covers about everything.
from squirmy, shabby, congenitally twisted, slimy William Brownfield. He's simply too low down and dirty for our planet, just right for a carnival side-show, not some country's State Department.
William Brownfield, there's someone looking for you!
[center]
[/center]
Thank you for this wildly misleading, utterly contemptible look at Brownfield's "innocent" communique. What a born deviant.
I guess we have to assume his name isn't William Brownfield, either! He probably lies about that, too!
Isn't it quaint they all couch their language to "home base" in propagandese? As if that will cover their asses. They try to assign loving, humane values to the damage they do by pretending to be fighting for the cause of the greater good, which is based upon wildly twisted yarns.
[font size=7]DIRTBALLS![/font]
