Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 01:42 PM Feb 2014

What Weisbrot really said about China and Latin America

One of our resident Mad Tea Partyers in the Latin American Forum recently posted this headline: "Weisbrot begs China to bail out Ven and Argentina" and included a link to an article by Mark Weisbrot at Huffington Post.

Weisbrot's article, the actual title of which is "China Has Good Reason to Help Stabilize Latin American Economies", a) doesn't "beg" China to "bail out" these countries but rather lays out the reasons why Chinese lines of credit/investment in Latin America are good for China, and b) provides news that is suppressed by the 1%-er media, for instance, that Venezuela has paid back much of its loans from China, that Bolivia (another leftist government hated by the 1%-er media) has piled up foreign cash reserves even greater than China's (relative to GDP), and that the U.S.-dominated IMF deals out flexible credit lines only to rightwing governments (surprise, surprise!).

The article also contains the interesting observation that China has no military bases overseas and no empire, as opposed to the U.S. which has military bases all over the world. China's foreign policy is already based on a "multi-polar world" and has a "common interest (with LatAm) in an international political order that favors respect for national sovereignty and independence over unilateral intervention and military force." The article also points out that China has already done significant lending not only to Venezuela but also to Brazil, Ecuador, Cuba and other countries.

Weisbrot's article must represent a rather a serious threat to our 1%-ers given that one of our DU Mad Hatters jumped in so quickly to post it with a false headline. The Mad Hatters hate Weisbrot with the venom of the mad. (Weisbrot is like "Alice" asking logical questions and having normal human feelings toward others.) It is also probable that our Mad Hatter echoers of the corporate media propaganda on Latin America--that Latin American leftist democracies are bound to fail--is the visible layer of a deep and very, very dirty financial campaign against these rebellious countries, which have thus far done extremely well at reducing poverty, creating democracy and restoring their sovereignty, after more than half a century of U.S. horrors inflicted upon them. Our corporate rulers hate having these examples in the world of financial fairness, democracy and sovereignty, and are surely using our covert agencies against them. As Weisbrot says, "Washington would like to get rid of all of the left governments in the region and return to a world of 'limited sovereignty' there that it maintained 20 years ago."

--------------------------

Weisbrot's article: China Has Good Reason to Help Stabilize Latin American Economies
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-weisbrot/china-has-good-reason-to_b_4703407.html?utm_hp_ref=latino-voices&ir=Latino+Voices



2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Weisbrot really said about China and Latin America (Original Post) Peace Patriot Feb 2014 OP
you are the one who likesbthe repressive corrupt goverments of latin america Bacchus4.0 Feb 2014 #1
Thanks for promting democratically inclined DU'ers to read that article. Well worth it! n/t Judi Lynn Feb 2014 #2

Bacchus4.0

(6,837 posts)
1. you are the one who likesbthe repressive corrupt goverments of latin america
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 01:54 PM
Feb 2014

And dislikes the obamabadmin and writes crazy conspiracy theories all day long like abtea bagger.. china has colonial aspirations over Taiwan, pretty much controls N Korea. China has a terrible human rights record, labor rights record, environmental record and practices the most brutal capitalism. China is though smart enough not to invest too heavily in a failed state like Ven

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Latin America»What Weisbrot really said...