Latin America
Related: About this forumMedia Fails to Inform Public about Shifting Opposition Demands in Post-Election Venezuela
Media Fails to Inform Public about Shifting Opposition Demands in Post-Election Venezuela
By Alexander Main
Source: CEPR
Wednesday, May 08, 2013
Venezuela to audit votes without opposition conditions reads the headline of a BBC article published over the weekend. According to the piece, Venezuelas electoral authority will not carry out the full recount demanded by opposition candidate Henrique Capriles. A USA Today article from last Thursday notes that Capriles said the opposition would not participate in the audit because the National Electoral Council did not meet its demand for an examination of registers containing voters' signatures and fingerprints. An Associated Press headline Government formally rejects top-to-bottom Venezuela vote audit, heightening tensions suggests that the Electoral Councils rejection of the oppositions demands is stoking the flames of political conflict in the country.
As is often the case in the medias coverage of Venezuela, a crucial piece of context is missing from these and other articles on the recent decisions of the National Electoral Council (known by its Spanish initials as CNE). Faithful readers of our blog will remember that Henrique Capriles, after the CNE announced that hed lost the elections by a narrow margin of around 270,000 votes (narrowed down to 224,000 votes following the final count of votes cast abroad), refused to accept the results and immediately called for a recount, though other opposition spokespeople called instead for a complete audit of the voting machine receipts. After first calling on his supporters to take to the streets, leading to violent clashes in which over half a dozen people were reportedly killed, Capriles finally formally filed a set of demands to the CNE. Subsequently, on April 18th, the CNE agreed to audit the remaining 46% of boxes of voting machine receipts that had not yet been verified (54% of the boxes had been previously verified in the presence of witnesses from both parties).
What AP, USA Today, BBC and others fail to mention in their most recent articles is that Capriles accepted the CNEs April 18th decision to proceed with the audit of the remaining voting receipt boxes, and said that the opposition would participate in the process. According to AFP and other sources, Capriles said that the opposition campaign accepts what the CNE (
) has announced to the country. We will be there in the audit. We consider that the problems are in these 12,000 boxes (that will finally be opened in this audit). We will undoubtedly be able to show the country the truth.
Yet, soon after Capriles publicly accepted the CNEs decision, he and others from the opposition began to shift their demands. After originally claiming that a full audit of the voting receipts would shed light on the alleged fraud that had occurred initially claiming that their own quick count showed Capriles winning by 300,000 votes the opposition decided to focus primarily on the elections voting record books (cuadernos de votación). These books, present at each voting station, are where voters place their fingerprints and signatures after having voted electronically and deposited the paper receipts reflecting their voting choice in sealed boxes. According to opposition leader Antonio Ledezma these books are in fact where the crime has taken place.
More:
http://www.zcommunications.org/media-fails-to-inform-public-about-shifting-opposition-demands-in-post-election-venezuela-by-alexander-main
bemildred
(90,061 posts)It's just not what they are paid to do these days.