Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Beaverhausen

(24,470 posts)
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 02:40 AM Apr 2016

When did the Catholic Church become a good thing?

Did no Bernie supporters see "Spotlight?"

And a conference on The Idolatry of Money? Well, if anyone would know about that, they would.

Is this just nuts to any of you as it is to me?

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When did the Catholic Church become a good thing? (Original Post) Beaverhausen Apr 2016 OP
And they call us "Camp Weathervane." NuclearDem Apr 2016 #1
Yeah, that's one of their fave Projections. Cha Apr 2016 #7
It seems like a strange fit for him, agreed LisaM Apr 2016 #2
Thank you jehop61 Apr 2016 #11
" " " " MBS Apr 2016 #16
I like the direction of Pope Francis, to be more compassionate and kind, forgiving. Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #12
" " " " n/t MBS Apr 2016 #17
True. Kath1 Apr 2016 #14
Agreed Freddie Apr 2016 #23
Thank you! DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #22
But Bernie isn't going there to meet with the Pope Beaverhausen Apr 2016 #27
Bernie is so thirsty for attention ContinentalOp Apr 2016 #3
That's the thing.. right there.. there's evidence of it all along. He's sets himself up to be Cha Apr 2016 #8
Agreed! He is out to impress Catholic voters pandr32 Apr 2016 #20
Catholic voters won't be impressed LisaM Apr 2016 #28
EXACTLY n/t DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #29
and so lgbt and women friendly for a presidential candidate to hang out with nt msongs Apr 2016 #4
It's Sanders' Hail Mary FrenchieCat Apr 2016 #5
... SunSeeker Apr 2016 #6
Its s fine thing... FrenchieCat Apr 2016 #9
The same time.... SaschaHM Apr 2016 #10
When the Catholic church does not deliver their members votes, it will be under Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #13
IMO, this is OT for this group MBS Apr 2016 #15
Good post. DURHAM D Apr 2016 #18
Me, too! n/t MBS Apr 2016 #19
So Freakishly well said/stated!! Her Sister Apr 2016 #24
and so on, for sure MBS Apr 2016 #25
I concur again! lol! Her Sister Apr 2016 #26
I agree that this ought to be OT for this group Kaleva Apr 2016 #30
Meh. DU crawled up Pope McDreamy's ass a long Codeine Apr 2016 #21

LisaM

(27,813 posts)
2. It seems like a strange fit for him, agreed
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 02:45 AM
Apr 2016

But there are many liberal Catholics, like me, who do appreciate what Pope Francis is trying to do.

MBS

(9,688 posts)
16. " " " "
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:28 AM
Apr 2016

It also misses the point of what's wrong about Vaticangate. (See my post#15 of a few minutes ago, below).

Kath1

(4,309 posts)
14. True.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:11 AM
Apr 2016

As an ex-Catholic, I find it very refreshing that he seems more interested in social justice than what is going on with a woman's uterus. A small step in the right direction, IMHO.

Freddie

(9,267 posts)
23. Agreed
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:04 AM
Apr 2016

And maybe we'll see some small increments of progress towards women's equality in the next hundred years. It's good to see a change of focus up top.

DemonGoddess

(4,640 posts)
22. Thank you!
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 10:55 AM
Apr 2016

Same for this liberal Catholic. Something they don't understand, is what drives Pope Francis theologically. He is a JESUIT. Social justice is a big, big thing with the Jesuits, and always has been. It is core to the order. Something else, if they think about it, should say something about this attempted "gotcha" of Pope Francis. He avoided his home country for two years after he became Pope to avoid becoming entangled in the politics of his HOME COUNTRY. He's certainly not going to go out of his way to become entangled in AMERICAN politics at a small conference being held in Vatican City. Going by past actions, I would expect this Pope to avoid becoming entangled in our politics as well.

ContinentalOp

(5,356 posts)
3. Bernie is so thirsty for attention
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 02:52 AM
Apr 2016

He would sell out just as deeply as his supporters accuse the Clintons of selling out if he were given half the chance.

Cha

(297,275 posts)
8. That's the thing.. right there.. there's evidence of it all along. He's sets himself up to be
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 04:36 AM
Apr 2016

so pure.. but, it just ain't so.

pandr32

(11,586 posts)
20. Agreed! He is out to impress Catholic voters
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 10:49 AM
Apr 2016

to give him an edge. Where else is he going to get it from? His inroads with minorities were not very fruitful. This won't be either.

LisaM

(27,813 posts)
28. Catholic voters won't be impressed
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 12:15 PM
Apr 2016

Especially by a candidate who was "nauseated" by the only Catholic President.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
10. The same time....
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 07:39 AM
Apr 2016

voter suppression by limiting early and absentee voting, superdelegates choosing the primary loser, caucuses and others did.

If it benefits Bernie, it's like manna from the heavens.

MBS

(9,688 posts)
15. IMO, this is OT for this group
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 08:26 AM
Apr 2016

It also misses the problem of Vaticangate.

I think that Bernie really does like Pope Francis. (Heck, I love Pope Francis, too. And Pope Francis is genuinely, even courageously, trying to correct all the problems you've outlined).
That's not the problem.

The problem is that Bernie misrepresented, and exaggerated, the importance of the conference (an academic conference whose focus is a theological discussion of Pope John Paul II' s encyclical on social issues, on the occasion of its 25th anniversary) , the origin of his invitation (NOT the Pope), his role in the conference (minor), and Bernie's relationship (in short, none) to the Pope himself. In its political clumsiness and inappropriate grandstanding, it highlighted all the reasons why Bernie is not ready for primetime. At best, these were rookie, unclassy moves on the part of Bernie and his campaign handlers - a transparent, juvenile attempt to boost Bernie's status as well as his appeal to New York catholics.

As a bonus, the story has also provided a window into internal, academic-type, inside-baseball disagreements among the conference organizers The president of the Vatican Academy of Social Science (a laywomen, a professor from Great Britain) is clearly pissed at the CEO (a priest), and, probably, also with Sachs (a keynote speaker, a Bernie advisor and an admitted encourager of Bernie's invitation), and, because of the publicity, Bernie himself, because (a) -this is a guess on my part, but I could easily see that this would bug her- he has no qualifications, really, to discuss the issues at hand . He's not an academic, and he's certainly no expert on Catholic social theology, to say the least (b) his presence introduces specific partisan politics into a conference which is supposed to transcend such issues .* (c)- to make (b) even worse - Bernie overstated his role, and used the invitation for campaign PR.
I share her concerns and annoyance, in toto.
Would love to be able to eavesdrop on the "discussions" between the Academy president and CEO. . . and also her reaction to Bernie's arrival, especially if he arrives with a PR Contingent

My hope is that the academy president will forcefully block any and all attempts by Bernie to arrange a meeting with the Pope. And that the Pope and his staff will themselves have the savvy and good sense to keep Bernie far, far away from him.

* People have noted that there are two Latin American presidents among the speakers. But (a) they are sitting presidents, NOT candidates for president.(not to mention a candidate who's chosen to publicize his participation in the most tacky possible way). That's a BIG difference. Also (b) they are almost surely Catholic themselves. Also,(c) the two presidents are actual central participants in the conference. Bernie is listed among the "other" participants - basically an observer and/or discussant (even though he's reportedly trying to arrange to give a speech, despite his clearly peripheral "status&quot .

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)
18. Good post.
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 09:10 AM
Apr 2016

I can only imagine the conversations taking place among the legitimate participants as they brace for BS arriving with a plane load of reporters.

 

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)
24. So Freakishly well said/stated!!
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:37 AM
Apr 2016

I concur!

Also moving the conversation away from real problems in his candidacy! NYDN Fiasco/doozy where he did not seem to understand his own platform or able to flesh it out. He also got in trouble with the Israel question by exaggerating the numbers. And so on...

MBS

(9,688 posts)
25. and so on, for sure
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:50 AM
Apr 2016

Not been a good week for him. He is now beyond his pay grade, his weaknesses exposed.

Plus - another reason I ended up in Hillary camp - everything about him suggests that he would be a terrible manager and executive. I just can't imagine him in the Oval Office.

I think his voice is important. In the Senate, though, not in the Oval Office.

 

Her Sister

(6,444 posts)
26. I concur again! lol!
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 11:53 AM
Apr 2016

Something's wrong with BS camp! A lot of it is starting to feel bungled and their default has been to turn nasty!
In the meantime HRC camp seems to be running clean and beautifully and calm and collected but still going for the win!

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
21. Meh. DU crawled up Pope McDreamy's ass a long
Sun Apr 10, 2016, 10:51 AM
Apr 2016

time ago. This is just a symptom of a preexisting condition.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»When did the Catholic Chu...