Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueMTexpat

(15,369 posts)
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 07:34 PM Apr 2016

Bernie Sanders’ PUMA Moment: Hillary Clinton ‘Not Qualified"

This article includes the entire exchange between Joe Scar and Hillary and illustrates exactly how Bernie's full-scale attack on HIllary was unwarranted and unacceptable.

And still not apologized for.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/04/07/bernie-sanders-puma-moment-hillary-clinton-not-qualified.html

I don’t know how you read that, but I read it as Scarborough trying four times to get Clinton to say outright that Bernie Sanders is not qualified to be president, and her refusing to do so. She came sorta close; The Washington Post headlined a write up on it “Clinton questions whether Sanders is qualified to be president,” but she never said the words, and after attempt number four, she retreated to the standard, and appropriate, dodge about it being up to the voters. From there, the interview moved on to other topics.

And what did Sanders do? This, in a speech in Philadelphia Wednesday night.

She has been saying lately that she thinks that I am not qualified to be president.
...
Wait. What? “Has been saying”? “Has been saying,” as if she’d said it seven times? She didn’t even say it once!

Now—Sanders apologists will scream that she started it, and even neutral observers, if there are any, may be confused. But there’s a big difference between saying “raises serious questions” and “I’ll leave it to the voters to decide,” and saying flat out that one’s primary opponent is “not qualified.”

Clinton is still the favorite to win the nomination. I heard Chuck Todd say Wednesday morning that Sanders needs to win 67 percent of the remaining pledged delegates to overtake her lead. Since all delegates are awarded proportionally, and since there aren’t likely to be many huge blowouts in the upcoming states (we’re almost done with caucuses), that seems a tall order.
...
Why all these numbers? Just to show that it’s still likely that at the end of the process, Clinton will be ahead, and Sanders will have to endorse her. Not certain, of course, but likely. So the question is, how can he endorse her after saying flat out that she’s not qualified to be president?

Well, politicians have their ways. “She’s better than Trump/Cruz.” But won’t it ring awfully hollow? For her part, Clinton, looking toward a future mending of fences, brushed off Sanders’s remarks. It’s worth noting, too, that back in 2008, Clinton gave up the fight in early June right after the primaries ended and endorsed Obama. One has trouble picturing Sanders doing the same, if it comes to that, and what he said Wednesday night makes it even less likely.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders’ PUMA Moment: Hillary Clinton ‘Not Qualified" (Original Post) BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 OP
KnR. BS is not with us and neither are a big chunk of his followers. PUMA indeed. Hekate Apr 2016 #1
Win without them 72DejaVu Apr 2016 #2
Berning bridges. nt SunSeeker Apr 2016 #3

Hekate

(90,705 posts)
1. KnR. BS is not with us and neither are a big chunk of his followers. PUMA indeed.
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 07:39 PM
Apr 2016

Nice to know we can all count on each other in the end ... maybe.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Bernie Sanders’ PUMA Mome...