Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders’ PUMA Moment: Hillary Clinton ‘Not Qualified"
This article includes the entire exchange between Joe Scar and Hillary and illustrates exactly how Bernie's full-scale attack on HIllary was unwarranted and unacceptable.
And still not apologized for.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/04/07/bernie-sanders-puma-moment-hillary-clinton-not-qualified.html
I dont know how you read that, but I read it as Scarborough trying four times to get Clinton to say outright that Bernie Sanders is not qualified to be president, and her refusing to do so. She came sorta close; The Washington Post headlined a write up on it Clinton questions whether Sanders is qualified to be president, but she never said the words, and after attempt number four, she retreated to the standard, and appropriate, dodge about it being up to the voters. From there, the interview moved on to other topics.
And what did Sanders do? This, in a speech in Philadelphia Wednesday night.
She has been saying lately that she thinks that I am not qualified to be president.
...
Wait. What? Has been saying? Has been saying, as if shed said it seven times? She didnt even say it once!
NowSanders apologists will scream that she started it, and even neutral observers, if there are any, may be confused. But theres a big difference between saying raises serious questions and Ill leave it to the voters to decide, and saying flat out that ones primary opponent is not qualified.
Clinton is still the favorite to win the nomination. I heard Chuck Todd say Wednesday morning that Sanders needs to win 67 percent of the remaining pledged delegates to overtake her lead. Since all delegates are awarded proportionally, and since there arent likely to be many huge blowouts in the upcoming states (were almost done with caucuses), that seems a tall order.
...
Why all these numbers? Just to show that its still likely that at the end of the process, Clinton will be ahead, and Sanders will have to endorse her. Not certain, of course, but likely. So the question is, how can he endorse her after saying flat out that shes not qualified to be president?
Well, politicians have their ways. Shes better than Trump/Cruz. But wont it ring awfully hollow? For her part, Clinton, looking toward a future mending of fences, brushed off Sanderss remarks. Its worth noting, too, that back in 2008, Clinton gave up the fight in early June right after the primaries ended and endorsed Obama. One has trouble picturing Sanders doing the same, if it comes to that, and what he said Wednesday night makes it even less likely.
And what did Sanders do? This, in a speech in Philadelphia Wednesday night.
She has been saying lately that she thinks that I am not qualified to be president.
...
Wait. What? Has been saying? Has been saying, as if shed said it seven times? She didnt even say it once!
NowSanders apologists will scream that she started it, and even neutral observers, if there are any, may be confused. But theres a big difference between saying raises serious questions and Ill leave it to the voters to decide, and saying flat out that ones primary opponent is not qualified.
Clinton is still the favorite to win the nomination. I heard Chuck Todd say Wednesday morning that Sanders needs to win 67 percent of the remaining pledged delegates to overtake her lead. Since all delegates are awarded proportionally, and since there arent likely to be many huge blowouts in the upcoming states (were almost done with caucuses), that seems a tall order.
...
Why all these numbers? Just to show that its still likely that at the end of the process, Clinton will be ahead, and Sanders will have to endorse her. Not certain, of course, but likely. So the question is, how can he endorse her after saying flat out that shes not qualified to be president?
Well, politicians have their ways. Shes better than Trump/Cruz. But wont it ring awfully hollow? For her part, Clinton, looking toward a future mending of fences, brushed off Sanderss remarks. Its worth noting, too, that back in 2008, Clinton gave up the fight in early June right after the primaries ended and endorsed Obama. One has trouble picturing Sanders doing the same, if it comes to that, and what he said Wednesday night makes it even less likely.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 615 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie Sanders’ PUMA Moment: Hillary Clinton ‘Not Qualified" (Original Post)
BlueMTexpat
Apr 2016
OP
Hekate
(90,705 posts)1. KnR. BS is not with us and neither are a big chunk of his followers. PUMA indeed.
Nice to know we can all count on each other in the end ... maybe.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)2. Win without them
Owe them nothing
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)3. Berning bridges. nt