Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumThe Sanders Campaign’s Sexist New Argument: Hillary Tries Too Hard--too ambitious
Spot on.
April 7, 2016 9:38 a.m.
The Sanders Campaigns Sexist New Argument: Hillary Tries Too Hardhttp://nymag.com
/thecut/2016/04/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-tries-too-hard-ambitious.html?mid=twitter-share-thecut
By Rebecca Traister
From Tracy Flick to Hillary Clinton, female ambition isn't pretty. Photo: Getty Images, Paramount Pictures
On Tuesday night, following Bernie Sanderss big win in the Wisconsin primary, his campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, understandably jazzed in the midst of a victory lap, said a really stupid sexist thing about Hillary Clinton.
When CNNs Jake Tapper asked him about the increasingly aggressive rhetoric between Sanders and Hillary Clinton, Weaver averred that his campaign was prepared to play hardball. He then sounded a warning to the former secretary of State and her supporters, suggesting that they not get too critical of Sanders or his supporters. Dont destroy the Democratic Party to satisfy the secretarys ambitions to become president of the United States, Weaver said.
It was a small comment, in every sense. A throwaway bit of nastiness coming from a campaign manager in the late stages of a long and hotly contested primary battle. But the line, which overtly cast Clintons political ambition as a destructive force and framed her famous drive and tenacity as unappealing, malevolent traits, played on long-standing assumptions about how ambition a quality that is required for powerful men and admired in them looks far less attractive on their female counterparts, and especially on their female competitors.
Weavers language made explicit a message that has, in more inchoate form, been churning through the Sanders campaigns messaging in recent weeks. As Sanderss staffers spin the story of how they got to this point in the race with a candidate whose success has been unexpected and thrilling, especially with young Democrats and independents, but who has failed to win over voters of color and older voters, and remains badly behind his tough opponent by nearly every metric they seem to have been working on a new framing of Hillary, one that relies on old biases about how we prefer women to conduct themselves and how little we like those who flout those preferences.
So far during this Democratic primary contest (which has been respectful and high-minded compared to the GOP side), Team Sanderss depiction of Hillary has been of an unimaginative pragmatist, a hope-dashing incrementalist, and a corporatist too beholden to the financial sector to ever regulate or reform it in the way that will be required of our next president. These critiques have been tied to Clintons gender in various complicated ways, sure, but theyve also been rooted in reality she is a pragmatic incrementalist whos accepted money from banks that she shouldnt have! There are compelling arguments about the wisdom of the first two qualities and really nothing good to say about the third, but there you have it.
Of course, Weavers assertion that Clinton is ambitious is also rooted in reality. But in offering it up so baldly as a negative, in the weeks during which the campaign should be mounting its final argument, Weaver seemed to be suggesting that the argument against Clinton has come down, in part, to this: Shes Tracy Flick. And no one likes the woman who tries too hard, who competes with too much intensity, who applies too much focus to her own advancement. Its a message that some of Weavers colleagues have been nosing around for a couple of weeks, but Weavers comments seemed to make the argument cohere. It goes like this: Bernie Sanders is a kind man whose relaxed and respectful approach to power has led him to come in second to a woman who works too hard and wants to triumph too much; Hillarys unembarrassed commitment to winning the race not only makes her unappealing but could be ruinous to the party shes vying to lead.....................
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)to the woman who's raised millions for it.
LisaM
(27,812 posts)sez the henchman of someone who's running for President.
Upside down world.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)that no matter what you think of Bernie at this point, his campaign advisers are detestable people.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,986 posts)and they seem to want to continue the trend.
synergie
(1,901 posts)I mean, unless the argument is that poor old Bernie is just so senile and demented that he just has no power over the people in his employ and the words that come out of his mouth, over and over again, it's just dishonest.
His campaign is full of detestable people and they're taking orders from the guy who's been described as being way too "hands on" and who has been following a strategy of "let Bernie be Bernie". This is Bernie, he's not what he was advertised to be.
He should be detested in his own right, that he lets his staff, his surrogates and his supporters go on doing what they're doing, proves it.
Have you seen what they're deploying their army of true Berniebers (paid and otherwise) to do to Superdelegates?
If you're going to run attacks of guilt by association, what exactly does that say about Bernie and the people HE's associated with? There are human rights abusers, racists, misogynists, tyrants and killers there. He's hoist on his own petard, with his lack of actual ability to meet his own purity standards.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)synergie
(1,901 posts)call out the steaming piles of BS, but we can We don't even have to be dishonest, negative or abusive to do it. The facts are on our side.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,986 posts)How can a guy who claims to be liberal be so tone deaf?
synergie
(1,901 posts)synergie
(1,901 posts)Weaver just said she made some deal with the devil, and Ben Jealous pulled out the "mean girls" argument.
The implosion is epic.
sarae
(3,284 posts)they act like just by running, she's stepping beyond her bounds. I guess she's supposed to just step aside now that the man is here?
synergie
(1,901 posts)coronation of their anointed one, because clearly they are not winning voters, delegates or superDs projecting their own actions is habit for them.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)After scaring off 99% of Dem superdelegates, what's left besides making a total fool of yourself and your supporters?
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)SharonClark
(10,014 posts)You better be nice to us or else!
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)So, all this nastiness from his surrogates, and staff? It stems from him.