So Hillary supporters are voting for the "v-Jay"

[still_one]

Here is the full context:

"The lemmings don't care...

These facts are over their heads. Some are just voting for the v-Jay."

Not familiar with the term "v-Jay"? Here is what urban dictionary says:

www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=v%27jay

Here is how a jury ruled:

On Wed Mar 30, 2016, 04:16 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

The lemmings don't care...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1603479

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Claiming that some Clinton voters are voting "for the v-Jay" is rude and inappropriate.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Mar 30, 2016, 04:33 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: the what?
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It is rude and inappropriate, but not over the top. I expect this kind of thing during primary season, I would have preferred a counter-argument or other way of calling it out. I don't think it's worthy of an alert or hide. Leave it alone.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Disgusting comment, rude, inappropriate, offensive, and over-the-line sexism.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: deragatory slur at women. Poster should be flagged for review

For those not familiar with the term the poster used, it is "vagina". Refer to urban dictionary. This is an intentional sexist slur referring to someone as an anatomical part.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

[still_one]

4. Referring to a person as a part of the genital organ is sexist and wrong, and a TOS violation

[LannyDeVaney]

7. And yet "this is to be expected during primary season" ...

What's good for the goose is obviously not good for the gander.

[kjones]

21. Or as I like to say in this case: "What's good for the goose is good for the panderer." nt

[SunSeeker]

2. K & R for exposure of out of control Sanders partisan packed DU juries. nt

[leftofcool]

3. I vote be voting for the dick

[still_one]

5. This should be offensive to not only Hillary supporters, but also Bernie supporters

[KitSileya]

6. You'd think so, but my alert did not succeed.

I did alert on the jury results.

[Arkansas Granny]

10. Yes, it should be, but we can clearly see that it's not.

[CalvinballPro]

37. There seems to be a lot of subjective ethics being utilized by Sanders supporters lately.

Basically, it's an "anything, no matter what, in service of BERNIE" attitude. Bernie does something definitively counter to his brand, like trying to get super-delegates to subvert the popular vote? His supporters are all for it, even after months of decrying the whole super-delegate system.

I've seen posts by Sanders supporters insulting non-native English speakers pass jury review, as if we're all just a bunch of Trump Republicans around here. WTF, DU?

I'd respond with my suggestion for a similar retort to Sanders supporters, but not only would that be stooping to their level, it would probably be alerted and hidden by a majority-Sanders-supporting jury.

[Agnosticsherbet]

8. At no time should we accept blatant sexism or racism or any such social dysfunction.

[still_one]

17. absolutely.

[fun n serious]

9. And they have the nerve to say sexism does not exist in this campaign!

This is sick. You know we're NOT less enthusiastic. We're just classier. That is a fact

[shenmue]

20. Yep

[Starry Messenger]

11. Per Skinner, those jurors who voted to leave should have their jury

privs removed.

[johnp3907]

13. Hear! Hear!

[still_one]

16. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

[LiberalFighter]

18. I hope so!

[fun n serious]

22. YES!!

Thank you!!

[johnp3907]

12. They're repulsive creatures.

[72DejaVu]

14. There sin't anything that the Sanders cult can't get away with

But say you don't like the color of Fearless Leader's tie and you risk a hide.

[Stand and Fight]

15. I was Juror 6. I tried. I sent an alert to the admins over it. n/t

[still_one]

19. Good for you S&F.. I was Juror 7

[SharonClark]

24. Good for you still_one

Glad you're on the Hillary's side.

[still_one]

25. ...

[Stand and Fight]

32. I was surprised, quite frankly, that it was allowed to stand.

Reality is that I should not be surprised at all in the current environment.

[Cha]

34. Good thank you, Stand and Fight~

[Stand and Fight]

35. Things are so toxic that I haven't been as active...

I've gone back to focusing on my studies and listening to Beethoven's nine symphonies when I'm not tweeting or occasionally on here. It's utterly reprehensible that such conduct, such vile words, should be allowed to stand on a so-called "DEMOCRATic Underground"! I've a 100% chance to serve on juries. Likewise, I occasionally refresh my browser throughout the day JUST to try to inject some reality into an altogether lopsided process.

[geek tragedy]

23. very nasty people, some of these people, very nasty

they'll be leaving within 70 days though, voluntarily or otherwise

[DesertRat]

26. Nasty and misogynistic

[johnp3907]

27. I just alerted on another comment by the same idiot.

It had already been alerted on and allowed to stand. This place is diseased.

[Funtatlaguy]

28. A v-jay is actually a video dj.

As in disc jockey.
I think Vh1 or MTV coined the term.

I think the inappropriate thing the author meant to say is va-jay-jay. As in, well you know.
Lord, this is the weirdest campaign season ever.

[johnp3907]

29. They edited the post.

Oh, it's muuuuuuuuch better now.

That poster is scum.

[still_one]

31. I told him to. The poster knew exactly what he meant.

Regardless, the jerk edited with vile remarks, and I am finished dealing with it.

I have much better things to do. I am finished with that group

[Dawson Leery]

30. Perhaps Trumpite Susan Sarandon can explain how men vote with their vaginas?

[Cha]

33. Thank you so much for exposing this misogynist slur that was allowed to stand on du, stillone.

I know you abuse alerted on it.. the Admins needs to see exactly what's going on here and who allows it.

Thank you~

[DemonGoddess]

36. The original post is vile

the edited post is just as bad. Yet, it and many other like it (brick post) are allowed to stay. Why? If I were to go into that forum and make a derogatory comment about how Berniebros are voting with their genitals, I KNOW it'd get a hide. It would be right to hide such filth. But, because the filth is against a woman, it's allowed to stand.