Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumFive Thirty Eight shows what the electoral map would look like
if women refused to vote Trump
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)mcar
(42,375 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....just before the Iowa caucuses. That changed pretty fast!!
Arkansas Granny
(31,531 posts)to be in the basement.
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)there are some deluded women who LIKE the racist asshole. But, the good news is that they're a minority of US.
charlyvi
(6,537 posts)http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-women-idUSKCN0WJ155
Half of U.S. women have 'very unfavorable' view of Trump: poll
Half of U.S. women say they have a "very unfavorable" view of the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling, up from the 40 percent who felt that way in October. The survey was taken from March 1-15, and included 5,400 respondents.
The rise in anti-Trump sentiment among women could pose a problem for the New York billionaire in his quest for the White House. Women form just over half of the U.S. population, and they have turned out at higher rates than men in every election since 1996, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)And it feels so cool!
Vote for your body, vote for your soul ladies, Vote Democrat!
Her Sister
(6,444 posts)woah!
DavidDvorkin
(19,486 posts)And just think what that would also mean for the Senate, House, and state-level races.
brer cat
(24,609 posts)He needs to be crushed and humiliated!
Treant
(1,968 posts)Only George Washington was ever elected unanimously by the Electoral College. It's thought that they would choose to continue that tradition in the (unlikely) event of a unanimous Electoral College win today. One willing elector would abstain, making the vote 537-0-1 today, to maintain Washington's legacy of the only unanimously-elected President.
LiberalFighter
(51,094 posts)Besides there were fewer electoral votes back then and political parties weren't a major part yet.