Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumI'm officially disgusted with DU
I alerted on this post this morning
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6737717
the "judges" in their infinite wisdom decided to leave the post up
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
YOUR COMMENTS
insulting Hillary supporters and insulting Hillary herself
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Thu May 28, 2015, 06:49 AM, and voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: seriously
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: OTT nasty attack on fellow DU members.
Seriously, you and some others who can't seem to keep their loathing in check, need to dial it waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I thought it was supposed to be the Republicans who were smearing Sanders hence this comment is valid.
If you (as a Clinton supporter) are saying that Clinton (and/or) supporters are behind it then the comment
has now become valid in that respect too.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Claiming that a DEMOCRATIC candidate for the DEMOCRATIC nomination is a Republican is WAY over the top.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Republican mindset.
And so many prefer to pretend it is not happening, lots of Recs for lots of OP's attacking Clinton, far fewer than attacking Republicans.
Mission Being Accomplished.
Supporting your candidate can only mean one thing.....set up an armed camp, exclude all that are not Pure, and start flinging crap into any other camp.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)The TOS does not appear to apply to them. It is going to be a long primary season, buckle up.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Cha
(297,651 posts)filter over their ugly insults and get away with it.
I'd like to say what I think of those kind of supporters but I would get a hide. Just know that I can't even look at Bernie's pic without thinking of their ugliness.. it's so pervasive.
Poor Bernie.. it's not his fault that he's represented so poorly on DU by these kind of supporters calling us "barely dems" and "Hillary a republican". So, ignorance is allowed stand. Got it!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)Making examples of two or three deserving posters might get the jerks' attention.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Last night he went after skinner.
okasha
(11,573 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)Poor Bernie Sanders is saddled with the initials his parents gave him, but some seem to think they're posting instructions.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Cha
(297,651 posts)still_one
(92,394 posts)to not engage in the pissing contests, but as an observer it is interesting to watch
onehandle
(51,122 posts)I carefully selected a number of gun trolls who have stalked me for years to blacklist and it helped a lot.
Now I'm thinking of changing it to the 'Not Hillary' Party ringleaders.
Or not. Might be some crossover there.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Lol i don't think the anti-Hillary people dislike yet as some of the posters in the religion room do.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)and I can't remember anyone challenging one of our decisions except maybe a handful of times if that
the jury system is horrible
there is no rhyme or reason in their decisions; they disregard long standing rules or completely ignore them
that's one of the reasons I quit donating to DU; why should I bother supporting a site that refuses to enforce its rules
okasha
(11,573 posts)was that it removed whole sub threads. If we could reinstate mods to hide offending posts as we do now, but leave everything else intact, I would be one happy camper.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)if you removed a post, it would remove the rest of the responses if I remember correctly
okasha
(11,573 posts)But now it's clear that it's possiblr to hide only the offensive post.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)if the OP is hidden
that's just me
okasha
(11,573 posts)in the responses, or in responses to the responses.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)post.
Makes us look bad IMO.
I don't agree with it and it is up to us to make sure that fellow Democrats don't go along with smearing ANY Democrat, and that includes Sanders.
I'm not liking some of his supporters, but Sanders himself should be defended, just as Hillary should.
I think this group should stop complaining too. We are better than that. Let the Sanders people be the gossipy mean ones.
Post good stuff about Hillary, post defenses of her.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I've been knocked down a couple of times and insulted by jackasses on the jury as well!
We will never get fair treatment on DU, the system is rigged against us when this board is 95% Bernie fans.
I don't know what the answer is. I expect to see calls for banning Hillary supporters entirely from the board as it becomes more and more clear that Hillary will be the democratic candidate late this year and into next.
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Kidding...
Cha
(297,651 posts)of these Bernie supporters are so mean spirited and give the campaign an ugly stench.
It's like I can't even stand to look at Bernie because of them.. and it's not Bernie's fault.. it's just that they are so prevalently nasty about it. I think Bernie would be appalled.
And, no one called Bernie a Racist.. it's them playing the victim card. Because you know... St Bernie can do no wrong and shit like the alerted post is allowed to stand.
At least the post calling this group a "Toxic Wasteland" was a HIDE.
William769
(55,147 posts)It's the end game that counts.
Cha
(297,651 posts)Obama!
Really nice to see you, William!
William769
(55,147 posts)Cha
(297,651 posts)Cha
(297,651 posts)just now.. and some wonder why we get so frustrated that we kinda just want to Vent.
I know that isn't true.. not sure if the author of it knows or not.. but if they don't know then they sure are not paying attention. which makes them "dangerously unobservant".. as WC Fields was known to have said at one point to his butler after he saw him come from outside where it was snowing, covered with the white stuff.. Fields said: "snowing then?.." and his man said he hadn't noticed.
That's paraphrasing somewhat because I read that last century but never forgot the dead on quip.