Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumSome Bernie fans seem to be losing hope and are announcing they will vote for...
....the Green Party candidate, Jill Stein.
I had never heard of her so I had to do some reading. Jill Stein is as qualified to be President as Ben Carson. Like Carson she is physician.
She has run for several offices - Massachusetts House of Representatives, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Governor of Massachusetts, and President of the United States on Green Party ticket in 2012. She lost each of those races by very large margins.
However, in 2005 she did manage to win 539 votes and get herself elected as one of 21 Town Meeting Representatives in her home town of Lexington, Massachusetts. Lexington has a huge population of 31,394. She was reelected to that post in 2008.
With all of that experience I can see why some believe that she is totally qualified to be President of the United States and leader of the free world.
Cha
(297,323 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)to Hillary~
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)coattails.
They've never aligned with Dems anyway so why start now.
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)And who in their right mind would throw away their vote on an unqualified person like Jill Stein? It would have the same effect as it they voted for the GOP.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)don't want hillary and will take the chance of losing the election to a republican.
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #3)
Post removed
tritsofme
(17,380 posts)Of the "jury" process.
Because IOKIYABB
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1107&pid=71521
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Bernie Bro is a slur meant to paint Sanders supporters as racist and misogynist. It's an internet myth made up just to smear Sanders supporters. It has no place on DU.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Mar 13, 2016, 05:55 AM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Enough with the Bernie Bro nonsense.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The OP and this post would be offensive to Bernie supporters. Is the purpose of the Hillary group to be slanderous to the opposing team?
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: if this post is hidden it is an absolute disgrace and a signature example of alert stalking. I'm hoping my vote screws over your shameful alert stalking attempt, my little Bernie-bro.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Racism didn't even cross my mind when I read it.
To me, it seems like a Hillary supporter made a comment in support of Hillary in the Hillary Clinton forum.
That's to be expected, isn't it?
For info; I'm still on the fence between Bernie and Hillary, although no matter which one gets the nomination, that's who I will vote for.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)but calling Secretary Clinton a liar, a murderer, HiLIARy, Shillary, $hillary and tell her to go f&%k herself with a brick etc is just fine.
The hypocrisy, it burns (or should I say it berns?)
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,035 posts)They can dish it out but can't take it.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)I have never seen group of people who are so sensitive and so easily insulted.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Announcing your support for the GOP funded Green Party get you a pat on the back.
jsmirman
(4,507 posts)in one hidden post after another. That is clearly contrary to the stated rules of the website.
"advocating in favor of Republican nominees or in favor of third-party spoiler candidates that could split the vote and throw an election to our conservative opponents is never permitted on Democratic Underground."
Seems pretty clear to me.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)are trolling this site. For republicans or against democrats. Doesn't really matter. Either way, it's tons of hysteria against democrats
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)It take only one troll make the original alert, but you can't fill out a jury pool with trolls; there is only one source of this madness.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Aristus
(66,388 posts)Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)Chances are they won't be voting for anyone in November.
Response to CajunBlazer (Original post)
Cheese Sandwich This message was self-deleted by its author.
TomCADem
(17,390 posts)Particularly when Bernie has been coming on strong as of late.
Cha
(297,323 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)...but some are starting to figure out that he will probably fall short
book_worm
(15,951 posts)artyteacher
(598 posts)sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)of Sanders supporters, aka the Berniebros, that have never been Democrats and never will be.
The sooner they slink off the sooner we can get to winning the general.
pandr32
(11,588 posts)MSMITH33156
(879 posts)like Super Delegates are their best friends.
After complaining that these Superdelegates were going to hand Hillary the nomination, for months, they've now realized that she is going to win with the votes, and arguing that even if she's ahead, if she's sort of the necessary delegates, that the super delegates should hand Bernie the nomination.
Bernie himself argued this this morning.
Also, Jake, I would say that, as the campaign progresses and if, if we do well in a number of states, and if the general sentiment becomes that Bernie Sanders is the candidate who will defeat Donald Trump -- and all of the polls -- virtually all of the polls have me doing better against Trump than Hillary Clinton -- I think a lot of those superdelegates who are today pledged to Hillary Clinton may say, what's most important is defeating Trump or the Republican nominee. Bernie Sanders is the candidate to do that. We're going to swing over to Bernie.
The audacity of complaining for months that the super delegates were going to override the will of the voters and then coming out now and asking super delegates to do just that, to disenfranchise all of us that have supported Hillary, to hand him the nomination is unbelievable.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)delegates didn't exist and only pledged delegates counted, in a two person race the person with the most pledged delegates after all of the primaries and caucuses are over is automatically the winner. Given the proportional nature of the delegate splitting, once one candidate is well ahead, as Hillary is now, it is very difficult for the opponent to catch up.
However, to cinch the nomination before the convention without the super delegates, a candidate has to win not only half of all of the pledged delegates +1, but also enough additional pledged candidates to equal half of the super delegates. That is a higher hill to climb.
However, if Hillary enters the convention with any kind of a pledged delegate lead, there is no way that the super delegates are going to suddenly give the nomination to a non-Democrat. I have my doubts whether they would give the nomination to Sanders if he had the pledged delegate lead entering the convention - but that isn't going to happen.
Bernie is singing the song of a beaten candidate.