Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1332 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (22)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nate Silver got it wrong! (Original Post)
George II
Feb 2016
OP
DURHAM D
(32,611 posts)2. Is he under the bus now? nt
jmowreader
(50,562 posts)6. No. Nate's good people. We'll let him slide.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)3. He missed on the Spring Breakers!
Revolutions have to be timed just right!
DavidDvorkin
(19,486 posts)4. So did Born To Run the Numbers
http://www.borntorunthenumbers.com/2016/02/south-carolina-d-primary-projection.html
He predicted 63% to 37%.
He predicted 63% to 37%.
Gothmog
(145,567 posts)5. Nate was close enough
Chichiri
(4,667 posts)7. Actually, this result fell inside the confidence interval.
Just barely.
George II
(67,782 posts)8. Yes, I was being humorous, I thought.