Hillary Clinton

question everything

(47,497 posts) Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:11 AM Feb 2016

Thus, exactly the same post on Sanders is allowed to stand with gazillion recs

Last edited Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:49 PM - Edit history (1)

but when it is on this group - with the name reversed - it is hidden?

Hosts, please show this to the administration. Not that it will make a difference.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1280123955

http://www.democraticunderground.com/110757230

edit to add links to the ATA questions

by CajunBlazer

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12599494

(and there is a second one currently hidden until Skinner replies... if he will)

and mine, with similar results - one big nothing

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12599632

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Thus, exactly the same post on Sanders is allowed to stand with gazillion recs (Original Post) question everything Feb 2016 OP

If you draw the wrong jury you don't stand a chance liberal N proud Feb 2016 #1

Mathematically speaking, we will ALWAYS draw the wrong jury ... NurseJackie Feb 2016 #18

Since the administrators say that the breakdown of members here are 85/15 Sanders/Clinton.... George II Feb 2016 #20

The idea that they are alerting on stuff posted within our own group jsmirman Feb 2016 #2

This is why the hosts of a group should be able to over rule a jury verdict question everything Feb 2016 #5

Yes, he's getting it wrong here - the applicable community standards here are those of this group jsmirman Feb 2016 #14

I gave it a rec Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #3

Ditto. (nt) Treant Feb 2016 #7

Me three CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #12

KNR Lucinda Feb 2016 #4

How many times can one post be rejuried? jmowreader Feb 2016 #6

A good question to ask the administrator in that forum question everything Feb 2016 #9

No, there's only one jury per post or OP. Cha Feb 2016 #17

Yes, I saw that. The double standards with that group is Disgraceful. Lil Missy Feb 2016 #8

I am afraid Sanders his going to try to stay in the race as long as possible CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #11

Theoretically he could stay in with no money, and campaign by word of mouth jmowreader Feb 2016 #13

I add a link to your post in to request I had already posted the "Ask Adminstrator" section. CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #10

Done. Thanks for suggesting this (nt) question everything Feb 2016 #25

K & R for exposure. nt SunSeeker Feb 2016 #15

K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #16

K&R! DemonGoddess Feb 2016 #19

K&R CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #21

I served on a jury DemonGoddess Feb 2016 #22

A jury that was biased. book_worm Feb 2016 #23

I should clarify DemonGoddess Feb 2016 #24

it's election season mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #26

liberal N proud

(60,338 posts)

1. If you draw the wrong jury you don't stand a chance

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:16 AM

Feb 2016

I don’t know if there are others but they managed to get me banned from serving. If they have done that to a number of us, then the juries would be skewed. No way to prove anything!

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)

18. Mathematically speaking, we will ALWAYS draw the wrong jury ...

Reply to liberal N proud (Reply #1)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:54 AM

Feb 2016

... and they know it. That's why it's a system weakness that's easy for them to abuse.

Note to Jury: Skinner himself had noted the ratio imbalance on more than one occasion and has already acknowledged that changes need to be made. I'm not making this up.

George II

(67,782 posts)

20. Since the administrators say that the breakdown of members here are 85/15 Sanders/Clinton....

Reply to liberal N proud (Reply #1)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:57 AM

Feb 2016

....supporters, mathematically the average jury is made up of 5.95 (6) Sanders supporters and 1.05 (1) Clinton supporter.

No wonder one post linked in the OP was hidden, the other wasn't.

jsmirman

(4,507 posts)

2. The idea that they are alerting on stuff posted within our own group

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:19 AM

Feb 2016

the authoritarian strain in these ones is strong.

question everything

(47,497 posts)

5. This is why the hosts of a group should be able to over rule a jury verdict

Reply to jsmirman (Reply #2)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:30 AM

Feb 2016

about a group. But Skinner is aghast. Absolutely not, he decreed.

jsmirman

(4,507 posts)

14. Yes, he's getting it wrong here - the applicable community standards here are those of this group

Reply to question everything (Reply #5)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 02:32 AM

Feb 2016

frankly, alerts on any posts in this group should only go to juries comprised of members of this group.

We, together - under his reasoning - are the ones best suited to know the community standards of this group's board.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

3. I gave it a rec

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:29 AM

Feb 2016

Treant

(1,968 posts)

7. Ditto. (nt)

Reply to Thinkingabout (Reply #3)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:05 AM

Feb 2016

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)

12. Me three

Reply to Treant (Reply #7)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:38 AM

Feb 2016

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)

4. KNR

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:30 AM

Feb 2016

jmowreader

(50,561 posts)

6. How many times can one post be rejuried?

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:56 AM

Feb 2016

I've seen several posts here that pass juridical muster the first time they're alerted on, then are rejuried and hidden.

question everything

(47,497 posts)

9. A good question to ask the administrator in that forum

Reply to jmowreader (Reply #6)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:28 AM

Feb 2016

Supposedly when a post get alerted a second time, the alerter gets a response that it was already been judges but that it would be passed to the administrators.

Cha

(297,378 posts)

17. No, there's only one jury per post or OP.

Reply to jmowreader (Reply #6)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:04 AM

Feb 2016

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)

8. Yes, I saw that. The double standards with that group is Disgraceful.

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:28 AM

Feb 2016

Super Tuesday will be here soon. Tomorrow will be the beginning of the end.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)

11. I am afraid Sanders his going to try to stay in the race as long as possible

Reply to Lil Missy (Reply #8)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:34 AM

Feb 2016

jmowreader

(50,561 posts)

13. Theoretically he could stay in with no money, and campaign by word of mouth

Reply to CajunBlazer (Reply #11)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 02:04 AM

Feb 2016

It's never been done before and it almost certainly wouldn't work, but when you point this out the response is always, "we're going to make history!" Well yeah, the Republican candidate getting 522 electoral votes in November WOULD be pretty historic...

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)

10. I add a link to your post in to request I had already posted the "Ask Adminstrator" section.

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:33 AM

Feb 2016

question everything

(47,497 posts)

25. Done. Thanks for suggesting this (nt)

Reply to CajunBlazer (Reply #10)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:49 PM

Feb 2016

SunSeeker

(51,578 posts)

15. K & R for exposure. nt

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 02:35 AM

Feb 2016

stonecutter357

(12,697 posts)

16. K&R!

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:30 AM

Feb 2016

DemonGoddess

(4,640 posts)

19. K&R!

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:40 AM

Feb 2016

I was flabbergasted that they hid the IDENTICAL post with name changes.

CajunBlazer

(5,648 posts)

21. K&R

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:54 AM

Feb 2016

DemonGoddess

(4,640 posts)

22. I served on a jury

Reply to question everything (Original post)

Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:10 PM

Feb 2016

a little bit ago about a post riversedge made in reply. I, of course, voted to leave it. So did 3 others, so the post was actually left alone for a change!