Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumOpen post to Skinner since ATA doesn't seem to be working for me
Take a look at our block list and tell us there is not a problem here.
It's a shame I had to resort to this.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)Cha
(297,282 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)I wasn't aware that Skinner has an Ignore List, but he's only human like the rest of us, because I have one too. I must be on all of Admin's Ignore Lists, because I never got a response, but I recently got a pm asking me to renew my star. I would gladly do that if I had equal access to Admin as others do. Go figure.
William769
(55,147 posts)Not only does ATA not seem to work, I sent several PM'S a couple a month's ago that went unanswered.
I heard that justice is blind but that she can hear. Well in some places at least.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)that they were working solutions,t but nothing would be implemented until after the primaries
William769
(55,147 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)I think groups should be managed by the hosts - no juries allowed. If people see clear site violations they can report directly to admins or MIRT...not sure what they can do with the scripting, but they could at least release people who have been temp suspended due to targeting posters.
sheshe2
(83,786 posts)patricia92243
(12,597 posts)already doing.
William769
(55,147 posts)I am not using that term loosely.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Good job the hosts are doing.
William769
(55,147 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)For the jury i am commenting on the length of it, not DUers.
William769
(55,147 posts)UtahLib
(3,179 posts)When I can get to my laptop, I can pm the names to you if you wish.
wysi
(1,512 posts)... that is one long list!
William769
(55,147 posts)REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Using the protected groups as a place to trash other DUers is bad enough, but trashing Skinner on his own board is beyond the pale.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Feb 11, 2016, 06:58 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No one is "too good" to be criticized. Stop trying to be a white knight.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Amazing...hide.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I think an email to the powers that be would have sufficed.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Skinner certainly doesn't need a jury to defend him.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Skinner is a big boy. He can defend himself. He has all the power here. He doesn't need people protecting him from his members opinions.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.