Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:58 PM Feb 2016

40 ACRES AND A MULE – A Political Tale

SOCIAL CHANGE doesn't happen swiftly as those who have participated in movements to change the status quo will testify. “Change is Gonna Come” isn’t a song that mentions quick fixes and easy times, but rather emphasizes that change is “a long, long time coming”. As minority groups have learned when looking back at their history, change takes enormous struggle, perseverance, and often time sacrifice just to take a few steps forward.

What most successful social movements of the 20th and 21st Century share; Whether the Civil Rights Movement, the Gay Rights Movement, the Feminist Movement, the Labor Movement, or the Environmental Movement, the simple truth is, none of these movements are finished yet. Most took decades of painstaking organized work, sweat, tears and even death before being able to claim a respectful piece of victory.

Newly freed slaves were once promised 40 Acres and a Mule, but most received nothing more than words, and little else. We can also recall during the Great Depression, Americans were promised a chicken in every pot. Unfortunately, these promises, if we care to remember, rarely worked out as they had been packaged, sold and bought. Even one of the most progressive Presidents, FDR, still compromised Black people right out of the Social Security Act that he championed. Domestics (read Black women) and Agricultural workers (read Black men/sharecroppers) were originally excluded from the bill as it passed into law. In so doing, they were also excluded from various attached programs, e.g., Aid to Dependent Children which passed under the act in 1935 as part of the “New Deal” (for whom? Some may have asked). There are those who defend FDR by pointing out that Black people were not specifically omitted, neglecting to acknowledge that Domestics and Farming were the primary work available to that minority group.

Now in 2016, we hear of wonderful promises made this election year. Who wouldn’t want Free Health Care, Free College, Free Childcare, and a living wage for every person working? Many of us would also love to get big money out of our politics as we are aware of how it diminishes our vote. The big banks certainly took us for a ride, and it would be great compensation to watch them sliced and diced into tiny pieces. The issues are excellent; a liberal’s dream! So then, what's the catch? Is this really truly possible, we ask? Because as a people, we learned long ago that there is no such thing as a Free Lunch, even once you are permitted to sit at the lunch counter.

When Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Democratic Socialist, running as President is queried on how all of these promises will be fulfilled, his answer is eerily consistent; there will be a radical Revolution that he will be leading. This term “Political Revolution”, for some of us who have lived that long, harken back to the days of the 1960’s “War on Poverty”. It is a war that we fight today, and in so doing, we are also forced to fight race based stereotypes it put upon us, which have stubbornly lasted to our detriment since. It is the tried and untrue slur of how people of color always seem to want something without working for it, aka, something for nothing. The War on Poverty, while perhaps well-meaning in its intent, left an ugly-spirited stain upon us, that we have been trying to wash out ever since. The whole racist connotation of the “Welfare Queen” has, in fact, won many elections, year after year. It is a legacy that may have hurt us more as an entire race of people, than the benevolent benefits it ever intended.

As earnestly as Bernie Sanders may believe in his promises of these great programs to voters, upon closer inspection, there is a solid barrier in achieving the legislation needed for his goals, if he were to be elected. It is an odd but old term called gerrymander. Every decade there is a census taken, and at this time district maps for each state are redrawn. The last Census election was in 2010, which happened to have been the year that Democratic politicians all over the nation suffered steep losses countrywide. Pres. Obama used a not so delicate term in describing the loss; a “Shellacking”. Each map is demographically drawn by those in power, and affects exactly how electoral districts within each state are decided. As expected, the Republican majorities in many State Houses managed an artful job of making sure to give Republicans a ridiculous advantage in maintaining their majority. It is an advantage tight as a whistle.

If one is frank and anchored in reality, while reading the fine print of the changes Bernie Sanders offers, it should be known that they do not have any realistic chance of passage until the year 2020, after the next census election (which is a presidential year election, so there is hope there). When asked about the unlikely passage of any of Sen. Sanders’ promises, he does then admit that most likely nothing will likely get through any Congress in his first term. The 75 year old politician does allude to a possible 2nd term and that is when the Revolution, we have to figure, will be in full blast?

It’s hard to believe that those supporting Sanders aren’t aware of this BFD detail, although it may be that some just don’t care. You see, these third party Independents, and Green Party types Liberals (btw, thank you Nader) are ardent supporters who believe deeply in what Bernie Sanders says, regardless of the immediate future outcome.

But what about voters who don’t follow politics closely? Those who simply don’t know the consequences of a gerrymandered Congress and what that truly means; or how it will impact the true realities of this “New Deal”? The working stiff trying hard to make ends meet, but unknown to him/her that their vote won’t change their status anytime soon. They should know the devil in the details, but indeed most are largely unaware of the caveats attached to Bernie Sanders’ plans. Especially since the Media isn’t talking about it? (ask yourself… why?) Guess the corporate media is too busy with Trump’s hair, and Hillary’s emails.

The real question is when hearing all the promises, will the "Revolution of 2016" actually move a Republican Congressional majority to demand that their government administers their constituents’ health care, while doing away with Insurance Companies and Big Banks? Will a Republicans House vote to give young people free college? Because that is who will decide, not Bernie nor his voters. If Healthcare reform was easy to pass, it would have been done long before Obama! Hillary tried it, and they have hated her ever since. Even President Barack Obama couldn’t even get his own party to vote on his original vision, let alone any Republicans! The healthcare fight, as it currently is started in 2009, and generously gifted us with the Tea Party, and is a fight not yet finished, It virtually separated Americans into various groups. Those who are glad to finally get it; those now want something totally different, and those who have attempted to repeal Obamacare 7,000 times, and took it twice to the Supreme Court! Well guess who has the power in congress since 2010, and will most likely have it after the election of 2016?

If, in support of the Revolution, folks are willing to March day after day, while the reportage on Television omits you from our lives, as they did the many marches against the War in Iraq, or the invisible Million Man March just this summer. Are you willing to take a chance to elect a man with flaws not yet uncovered (and there are many, I’ll tell you) nor exposed by either the GOP or the media, only to have to wait until maybe 2020, when he will be nearly 80 years old, or maybe never? Are you willing to hand over your healthcare that we are still fighting for? Are you willing to see the Supreme Court hang in balance? If you are, and you know what you are getting into, then by all means go for it!

In conclusion, ask yourself if there is a lesson learned from past movements and past promises? Back in the days when irresistible offers of 40 acres and a Mule and a New deal was proposed to us? I know what I learned; that progress doesn’t happen overnight, and that anything promised or said is never a given, and that nothing is ever free.


PS: This was written for some different forums, but though I'd post it here as well.
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
40 ACRES AND A MULE – A Political Tale (Original Post) FrenchieCat Feb 2016 OP
All I hear from Sanders is empty promises. William769 Feb 2016 #1
Promise them anything, and they will follow you.... FrenchieCat Feb 2016 #2
And here. William769 Feb 2016 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Cal33 Mar 2016 #28
Excellent OP! Spazito Feb 2016 #3
"Nothing is ever free" sheshe2 Feb 2016 #5
K & R Iliyah Feb 2016 #6
I know! What was up with that? FrenchieCat Feb 2016 #17
Exactly ismnotwasm Feb 2016 #7
K&R BooScout Feb 2016 #8
"40 Acres and a Mule" - what happened to that promise to freed slaves? BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #9
An excellent read of history, with so much information it will take some time to absorb it all. BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #10
Thanks! FrenchieCat Feb 2016 #11
You're very welcome! I know it wasn't easy to write it so credit should be given where due. BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #12
Excellent read! romana Feb 2016 #13
The word "bamboozled" springs to mind. They don't seem at all interested in how he's going to.... Tarheel_Dem Feb 2016 #14
K&R mcar Feb 2016 #15
Thank you, FrenchieCat! Cha Feb 2016 #16
You are always welcome my dear! FrenchieCat Feb 2016 #27
Great post! It also ties in really well with the article linked in SleeplessInSoCal's post Lucinda Feb 2016 #18
here here! Politicub Feb 2016 #19
KnR, Frenchie Hekate Feb 2016 #20
K&R for such an important read. nt UtahLib Feb 2016 #21
THANK YOU !!! THANK YOU !!!! THANK YOU!!! I've been talking about this digitally and historically uponit7771 Feb 2016 #22
Well said ... NanceGreggs Feb 2016 #23
Thanks Nance! FrenchieCat Feb 2016 #24
Excellent, Just Excellent CajunBlazer Feb 2016 #25
Glad you did! Thank you! FrenchieCat Feb 2016 #26
K&R! DemonGoddess Mar 2016 #29
thank you! Her Sister Mar 2016 #30
Kick Hekate Mar 2016 #31

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
2. Promise them anything, and they will follow you....
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:27 PM
Feb 2016

but don't have them read the small print...

If questioned, just savage Hillary.

I think that is the MO over there!

Response to FrenchieCat (Reply #2)

Spazito

(50,339 posts)
3. Excellent OP!
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:27 PM
Feb 2016
In conclusion, ask yourself if there is a lesson learned from past movements and past promises? Back in the days when irresistible offers of 40 acres and a Mule and a New deal was proposed to us? I know what I learned; that progress doesn’t happen overnight, and that anything promised or said is never a given, and that nothing is ever free.

Exactly.

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
17. I know! What was up with that?
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 08:34 PM
Feb 2016

They'll show two "looters", but a million peaceful Black men, why of course not!
so f*cking sad!

ismnotwasm

(41,980 posts)
7. Exactly
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:51 PM
Feb 2016

Despite winning the internets, I find it fascinating how many do NOT trust Sanders outside of his support base. I've been put in the uncomfortable position of kind of defending Sanders regarding the "S" word (Socialist). I would prefer not to of course, but I rather not spread disinformation about any Democratic candidate.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
9. "40 Acres and a Mule" - what happened to that promise to freed slaves?
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:06 PM
Feb 2016
By: Henry Louis Gates Jr.
Posted: Jan. 7 2013 12:24 AM

And what happened to this astonishingly visionary program, which would have fundamentally altered the course of American race relations? Andrew Johnson, Lincoln's successor and a sympathizer with the South, overturned the Order in the fall of 1865, and, as Barton Myers sadly concludes, "returned the land along the South Carolina, Georgia and Florida coasts to the planters who had originally owned it" -- to the very people who had declared war on the United States of America.


Sad and infuriating at the same time.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
10. An excellent read of history, with so much information it will take some time to absorb it all.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:07 PM
Feb 2016

Thanks so much, Frenchie. I've bookmarked to read the articles at the links you've provided, at my leisure, for a later time, but your post is a powerful testament to why we cannot afford to have Sanders as our 45th president.

FrenchieCat

(68,867 posts)
11. Thanks!
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:17 PM
Feb 2016

I basically just want people to know exactly what they are voting for....

while Sanders Supporters stress who people should be voting against!

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
12. You're very welcome! I know it wasn't easy to write it so credit should be given where due.
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:38 PM
Feb 2016

In their minds, some Sanders supporters believe that the ABC (Anyone But Clinton) strategy should reign supreme rather than having a closer look at the candidate they purportedly support. Some do the ABC because they don't want anyone taking a closer look at the candidate they're supporting, too; realizing that people might not like what they find - which falls right in line with their feverish alerting and hiding posts that threaten to expose his past.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,234 posts)
14. The word "bamboozled" springs to mind. They don't seem at all interested in how he's going to....
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 02:48 PM
Feb 2016

accomplish his utopian goals. He's just the latest shiny "new" thing. He and Trump have much in common. They've both managed to tap into white middle class angst, but we aren't the Republican party. Our party's leader will not be a dude who for decades has refused to even join the Democratic party until he needed access to its vast resources. Hypocrite!



Just 9 years ago Bernie won the Vermont Democratic primary for the 2006 Senate race as a write-in candidate — there was no serious opposition — but he declined to accept the nomination. Why? Because he's always insisted he is NOT a Democrat. In fact, he has said that it would be hypocritical of him to run as a Democrat:

"It would be hypocritical of me to run as a Democrat because of the things I have said about the party."
-



Socialist Scholars Conference in New York City, April 1990.
Well, we're all free to change our minds, maybe Bernie doesn't think being a hypocrite isn't so bad any more. Or maybe he's just decided the Democratic Party isn't quite as disgusting as he used to think it was. But what exactly has Bernie said about the Democratic Party? Let Bernie tell you in his own words:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/8/15/1409803/-Introducing-Bernie-Sanders-the-Hypocrite



"The Democratic Party ideologically bankrupt, they have no ideology. Their ideology is opportunism.”
- Interview with Vermont Affairs magazine, 1986, when he was running for Vermont Governor as an Independent against popular incumbent Democrat Madeleine Kunin, Vermont's first female Governor. Bernie got crushed, winning only 15% of the vote.

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
18. Great post! It also ties in really well with the article linked in SleeplessInSoCal's post
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 08:47 PM
Feb 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/110744731

which talks about how difficult it has been for deBlasio and McCray make real progress in NYC.

Our representative government is, by design, not made for huge sweeping changes.

All it takes is one election cycle for "fast food change" to be reversed. I think the only way for us to make real progressive progress, is to work from the bottom up electing Dems to public office (and reverse the gerrymandering you spoke about) and then (and this is where I lose some people ) we need to start trying to move the Republicans in the middle, leftward. THEN we'd have a true majority. I think many of them have begun to realize just how little their elected officials are doing to make their lives better. IMO that is why Trump is so popular. He isnt "them." And I know it would be hard to move them, because they have been bombarded with people like Rush and Glenn Beck telling them how evil Dems and Dem policies are for the last 20 years, but without them, we have to fight to hang on to the slow hard earned gains we make.


I hope your very thoughtful post gets through to people.

uponit7771

(90,339 posts)
22. THANK YOU !!! THANK YOU !!!! THANK YOU!!! I've been talking about this digitally and historically
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 12:00 AM
Feb 2016

... gerrymandered congress for months upon months and that Sanders critique of Obama sounds similar to a passenger yelling at the bus driver for not running through stop and go traffic fast enough.

This is an excellent read and a fair perspective

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»40 ACRES AND A MULE – A P...