Clinton Campaign Coverage Goes Off The Rails -- Again

[Alfresco]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-boehlert/-clinton-campaign-coverag_b_9188182.html

Searching for campaign infractions real and imagined, the media's etiquette police have been busy writing up Hillary Clinton for numerous violations lately.

[MADem]

1. They're terrified. That's why they've resorted to cheap shots and outright lies.

They don't like the idea of a woman POTUS, and most particularly, 'that' woman. They know that once she gets an idea in her head, she doesn't quit.

I think they're going to have to adjust their paradigms.

[Alfresco]

3. You are absolutely right.

[still_one]

2. just like the BS they pulled with Howard Dean, when they tried to "blow up the Dean Scream"

The MSM has been worthless for some time now.

Their accuracy in reporting is no better than a coin flip, and they are just another entertainment tonight.

Ed Murrow and Cronkite are rolling over

[Thinkingabout]

4. When the truth does not match the need, then spin your own tales.

I found it interesting this morning when I searched for information on the Albright the source closest to the facts and video was FOX, and did not rewrite Albright's statement.

[snot]

5. I'm for Bernie; but I agree.

I wish the media would focus on the issues and candidates' records; but that's asking too much from institutions owned by those who'd prefer coverage focussed on almost anything else.