Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Delegate Count - February 6, 2016 (Original Post) Stuckinthebush Feb 2016 OP
The next few months are going to be nail biters but we will continue to work everyday Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #1
I don't think the next few months will be tight Stuckinthebush Feb 2016 #2
No, but we will work as if we are always behind until the nominee is Hillary. Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #3
Well...that's the truth Stuckinthebush Feb 2016 #4
His opposition to immigration reform is unconscionable in Dawson Leery Feb 2016 #8
None Stuckinthebush Feb 2016 #9
It should be noted that Vermont is still Dawson Leery Feb 2016 #11
The caption "Delegates won" is a little misleading 6chars Feb 2016 #5
Historically they are very reliable Stuckinthebush Feb 2016 #6
good to know the data 6chars Feb 2016 #7
Long and strong! pandr32 Feb 2016 #10

Stuckinthebush

(10,845 posts)
2. I don't think the next few months will be tight
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 11:17 AM
Feb 2016

The polls for March states are with Hillary by a lot. The superdelegates are with the Democrat (Hillary). I think by the end of March it will be very clear that Clinton has it in the bag.

Sanders has limited support and he isn't getting the POC vote. There is no realistic path to victory for him. None.

But I do agree that we will continue to work every day to get her to and through the GE!

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
8. His opposition to immigration reform is unconscionable in
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:43 PM
Feb 2016

a liberal party such as the Democrats.

POC's have no reason to vote for him.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
11. It should be noted that Vermont is still
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:00 PM
Feb 2016

a rural state. Rural areas have never been known to be true bastions of liberalism.

6chars

(3,967 posts)
5. The caption "Delegates won" is a little misleading
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 11:59 AM
Feb 2016

firstly, superdelegates are not won in the sense that elected delegates are won through an election process, they are just individuals climbing aboard the train. secondly, for this reason, they are not as reliable as elected delegates.

Stuckinthebush

(10,845 posts)
6. Historically they are very reliable
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:09 PM
Feb 2016

Clinton's super delegates are strong supporters of hers and the Democratic party. They have no reason to switch endorsement.

Furthermore, these are Democratic Party leaders and Clinton is seen as the Party's standard bearer.

Sanders can hope for an unrealistic momentum that turns the tables in demographically unfavorable states so that he wins Super Tuesday. Only by winning a majority of states in March will he have even a chance at turning Clinton Supers. It's just not going to happen.

Lastly, super delegates have pledged their support publicly. The ones who flip will do so at their own political peril - and they know it.

Yes, the super delegate count for Clinton is rather solid. I'm not worried one bit about them being unreliable.

Here is a list of the super delegates and who they have pledged for:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Democratic_Party_superdelegates,_2016

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Delegate Count - February...