Sanders fans in my TL seemed obsessed w/ Clintons in 90s--this is Sanders in 90s, btw.

[riversedge]

Clever tweet IMHO!


Eric Boehlert ?@EricBoehlert 5m5 minutes ago

Sanders fans in my TL seemed obsessed w/ Clintons in 90s--this is Sanders in 90s, btw. (via WP)



Eric Boehlert ?@EricBoehlert 3m3 minutes ago

VT. Repub Smith voted for gun control; NRA vowed to take him down

[leftofcool]

1. Bam!

[Cha]

2. Excellent, rivers! thank you!

[redstateblues]

3. But but but "free college" "political revolution"

[warrprayer]

4. Congratulations!

Now you know just how the working poor have felt for the last 35 years or so....

[stonecutter357]

5. K&R!

[Thinkingabout]

6. There will be more and more revealed, it is a part of vetting, we knew

Sanders had not been vetted. Hillary, she has been professionally vetted for twenty five years. Interesting to see who was backing Sanders, he has repaid them several times.

[NurseJackie]

9. And Bernie bros wonder why they're banned from this group...

... as regularly as clockwork.

[Cha]

10. Good point, Jackie.

[NurseJackie]

15. ... and then GRIPE about it in GDP. And then WHINE about how "unfair" it is that ...

... the Hillary Group has banned more people than the Bernie Group. Well, yes we have. According to Skinner, the actual ratio of Bernie to Hillary supporters on this web site is about 6:1 (that's six Bernie supporters for each Hillary supporter).

Of course, these whiners are completely oblivious to the fact that the current banned-member numbers (our 479 compared to their 248) is only about a 2:1 ratio. This means that our rate of banning users is well below the actual ratio on this site.

If the Hillary group was actually banning people in direct proportion to the actual ratio, our number would be up to about 1240 bannings (instead of the current 479).

Conversely... if the Bernie group was actually banning people in direct proportion to the actual ratio, their number would be as low as about 80 (eighty) bannings (instead of the current 248).

This means that, the BERNIE GROUP BANS MORE OFTEN, and DISPROPORTIONATELY to the current 6:1 ratio on this web site.

And still, they gripe and moan and whine and complain about how horrible it is that they're the ones being treated unfairly.

Oh, boo-fucking-hoo! Give me a god-damn break! Grow up!

-----
Note to Jury: These are Skinner's claims, not mine. I've just done the approximate math and explained the proportionate estimates. No group or specific person has been smeared. No candidate has been attacked.

[yallerdawg]

18. Why don't they just ignore our little group?

Because it is and never has been about Bernie!

[Cha]

19. And, the factor that more of them come in here to Distrupt than we go into theirs. I have the BS

Group in the freaking trash.. there's no way I would go in there.

I suggest everyone do that. I suggest they put ours in the trash and then they wouldn't stumble in.

And, have to whine about it later. You come to disrupt you get canned. Simple enough.

The fact that we have more banned berns only means that they disrupt more which is pretty freaking obvious.

Thank you for all those stats, Jackie.

[jmowreader]

20. They don't "stumble" in. They come here on purpose, specifically to disrupt

The easiest way to maintain sanity in the Hillary Group, I have found, is to simply put any Bernie supporter you find in here on Full Ignore the instant you recognize them as Bernie supporters. I figure if they want to come here and disrupt, I have no interest in anything they have to say from here on out. Unfortunately, Skinner had to install another server just to handle my Ignore list, but it'll still be there when the Bernie fans all get tombstoned after he drops out of the race.

[riversedge]

17. It is the Bernie Bubble syndrome

[Metric System]

11. Slamming Hillary with BS accusations is wrong, but it's a daily occurrence over in GDP.

[Dawson Leery]

12. Peter Smith, unlike Bernie, has integrity.

[pandr32]

13. Wow, a Sanders endorsement from Wayne LaPierre!

OMG!!!
The devil himself

[riversedge]

16. Probably one of the worst edorsements Sanders could ever get.

[UtahLib]

14. The truth is finally coming, no matter how some will attempt to stamp it out.

[jmowreader]

21. But...but...but...BENGHAZI! in three...two...one...

Sanders' record on gun control is not good, so it's a wonder why so many pro-gun-control people love them some Bernie.