Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumBernie Sanders is damaging the Democratic Party
Last edited Thu Feb 4, 2016, 11:55 AM - Edit history (1)
Bernie says you can't be a progressive and a moderate at the same time. This reminds me of the Republican Tea Partiers who want to close down the GOP to all but the radical right. Efforts to create the Republican "Big Tent" have failed miserably and the GOP has been weakened significantly by that failure.
This has been the Achilles heel of Republican party in the last few Presidential elections. Ultra conservative Republican candidates have forced their more moderate and electable candidates to adopt stances which are more conservative than they are comfortable with in order to win their party's nomination. Once they have that nomination those stances have been their downfall in the General Election.
That is exactly what Bernie is doing in an effort to win a pitiful few delegates in in extremely liberal New Hampshire. While now Sanders is obviously in it to win it, one the prime goal of his campaign early on has been to pull Hillary further to the left. He is succeeding.
I strenuously object to the notion that one cannot be a progressive and moderate at the same time. I like many Clinton supporters believe strongly in many of the same progressive values which Bernie professes. We disavow many of the values that Republicans seem to cherish. We are all on the same side folks. What makes some of us moderate progressives is how far we are willing to go to accommodate political reality.
This is what the the Democratic party should be about - a party which deeply rooted in progressive values, but realistic enough in its positions to take and keep the White House. Political ideals without political power is the height of frustration. We cannot be like the Republicans who eat their own, who make their candidates virtually unelectiable.
We can not afford to make the same mistakes as the Republicans. We cannot be constantly fighting among ourselves because that weakens us to external forces. We can and must build a big tent in the Democratic Party where progressives from the far left to the very moderate can all peacefully coexist together. We must succeed where the Republicans have failed. That is the only way we will have the strength to put our ideas into practice.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)riversedge
(70,223 posts)in WI. He has so divided the state.
But back to your point. I have a hard time believing Sanders is doing this--fight over vocabulary words-so sophomoric IMHO
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I think its intentional considering the history of the man.
Can Bernie Sanders Win the Love of a Party He Scorns?
The long, troubled history of Bernie Sanders and the 'ideologically bankrupt' party whose White House nod he now seeks.
By MICHAEL KRUSE and MANU RAJU 8/10/2015
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/bernie-sanders-2016-democrats-121181
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)There is nothing inadvertent about it. The point of the Sanders movement is to either take over the Democratic Party and convert it into a far left party, or destroy it in the attempt.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)He doesn't give one crap about the Democratic Party and neither do his supporters.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Throwing around a lot of complete bullshit about cheating in order to taint the process. They are working overtime to try to set up the narrative that Hillarys eventual nomination is illegitimate.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Is that in their game plan going forward?
All it does it create more conspiracy to damage the Democratic party.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)They are likely to run out of excuses before they run out of losing states.
Ana Hauhet
(67 posts)So many great moments in the town hall last night but the media is only asking about the definition of "progressive". Trying to find a way to divide us.
still_one
(92,190 posts)looking at the rhetoric of some coming from that direction, Hillary was being referred to as "republican light", to even being referred to as "worse than bush", and this was NOT coming from the right wing.
It didn't matter what her actually voting record was.
No different then when they used the label "establishment", when describing PP or NARAL. They know exactly what they are doing.
Some of the ugliest posts I have seen about Hillary have come from so-called "progressive circles".
Nah, can't blame the media on this one. This kind of stuff is systemic within a campaign
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)This was their Southern Strategy and now they have Birchers like the Kochs in powerful and influential positions.
Did we invite the radical left? They are certainly feeling resurgent, for some reason. However we have prevailed without the radical left and I'm certain we will do so again. So the ideological purity thing isn't going to affect us like it has destroyed the Republican establishment. At least that's my hope. One never really knows for sure.
It's distressing in the short term but in the longer run it will work out. The radical left will sulk a bit but they will remain oblivious to their irrelevance.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)then I think is advisable. I truly believe that has been his strategy all along.
Lochloosa
(16,064 posts)Maybe they just did not have anything to vote for.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts).... without the far left, many of which have been wasting their votes on the Green Party other non contenders. Perhaps we are better off without the zealots on the far left. Prediction, far too many of Sanders' biggest supporters on DU will be gone after the primaries because there is no way that they will vote for Hillary. They are not Democrats.
Lochloosa
(16,064 posts)Maybe we need the zeolots on the far left to vote.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)That's not going to change anytime soon.
We lost the Senate primarily because we had much more vulnerable Senate seats up for election than the Republicans. The opposite is true this time around.
We cannot win the Presidency, the House or the Senate by becoming a far left party. That is simply a fact of life. Like it or not, Americans are not socialists.
Lochloosa
(16,064 posts)Repugs had to get elected to the seats before they could gerrymander anything. The Democratic party did not or would not pay attention to what was going on. Democrats were not voting!
I never said nor inferred Americans were Socialist. But you might be interested in this poll....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511137465
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)I have never found any candidate that I agreed on on every issue. I don't even think that is possible. However, since the Republican went far right; I have always agreed with Democratic candidates far more than Republicans and I have always voted accordingly.
Are you telling me there are "progressives" who are so caught up in their "principles" that they were not "enthusiastic" enough to vote or were so "idealistic" that they voted third party, both of which played right into the hands of the ultraconservative Republicans that they hate?
I don't believe it. Surely no one is that dumb.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Response to CajunBlazer (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)tough crowd
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)that. He's done nada for progress in this country but he's been pretty "moderate" (I'd go as far to say even conservative) when it comes to sensible gun laws, nativism (his vote against the 2007 immigration bill citing it would hurt Americans' jobs and wages), and wasteful Pentagon spending (Lockheed Martin's failed and ultra expensive F-35 program) in addition to his unconditional support of Israel.
artyteacher
(598 posts)After a few primaries with more diverse populations.
Ana Hauhet
(67 posts)Martin Childs @MartyDelMundo:
Who made Bernie Sanders the commissioner of progressivism? Being more liberal than someone doesn't mean they aren't progressive #ImWithHer
6:18 PM - 3 Feb 2016
http://bluenationreview.com/bernie-sanders-progressive-purity-test/
Politicub
(12,165 posts)I may get my posts hidden on DU, but I am not going to stop calling out sexism and all of the other isms that are the coin of the Sanders realm.
Hillary will be president for all of the people - not just the people who are in lockstep with her.
FloridaBlues
(4,008 posts)I hope she puts this race to bed come March 1
Cha
(297,240 posts)#BernieSanders is wrong.
You can be whatever you want to be.
You can refuse to be a poster child for any one group. https://twitter.com/donnabrazile/status/694995716251521028
11:30 AM - 3 Feb 2016
8 8 Retweets 6 6 likes
http://theobamadiary.com/2016/02/03/the-presidents-history-making-day/
Thank you, Cajon!
Gothmog
(145,256 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)I think the Democratic Party is getting a little "Buyer's Remorse" for letting him run as one of us!
FloridaBlues
(4,008 posts)I think he put himself in a box about this moderate vs progressive issue.
I like Sen Boxer text the best "sometimes Sen sanders is a democrat"
Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)the Democratic party. Go after the f***kin Republicans. What is so hard for them and their supporters to understand about that?