Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hillary Clinton

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts) Wed Feb 3, 2016, 07:23 AM Feb 2016

16

This is on point.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This is on point. (Original Post) PeaceNikki Feb 2016 OP

I didn't see it but I've read things.. you'd think Rachel would know better.. want to be a fair Cha Feb 2016 #1

I stopped watching Rachel over a year ago. Glad I did. n/t livetohike Feb 2016 #2

There is one thing similar to the 2008 primary and this nails it! yallerdawg Feb 2016 #3

No kidding! pandr32 Feb 2016 #4

Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #5

Cha

(297,297 posts)

1. I didn't see it but I've read things.. you'd think Rachel would know better.. want to be a fair

Reply to PeaceNikki (Original post)

Wed Feb 3, 2016, 07:27 AM

Feb 2016

moderator for her reputation if nothing else.

Mahalo Peace Nikki.. it is on point.

livetohike

(22,145 posts)

2. I stopped watching Rachel over a year ago. Glad I did. n/t

Reply to PeaceNikki (Original post)

Wed Feb 3, 2016, 08:32 AM

Feb 2016

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)

3. There is one thing similar to the 2008 primary and this nails it!

Reply to PeaceNikki (Original post)

Wed Feb 3, 2016, 01:13 PM

Feb 2016

pandr32

(11,588 posts)

4. No kidding!

Reply to PeaceNikki (Original post)

Wed Feb 3, 2016, 01:27 PM

Feb 2016

I was stunned when I listened. How could this be the unbiased Rachel Maddow the journalist and Rhodes Scholar?

Response to PeaceNikki (Original post)

Name removed Message auto-removed

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»This is on point.