Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cha

(297,650 posts)
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 04:15 AM Feb 2016

Why ‘Virtual Tie’ in Iowa Is Better for Clinton Than Sanders

snip//

Bernie Sanders is right: The Iowa Democratic caucuses were a “virtual tie,” especially after you consider that the results aren’t even actual vote tallies, but state delegate equivalents subject to all kinds of messy rounding rules and potential geographic biases.

The official tally, for now, is Hillary Clinton at 49.9 percent, and Mr. Sanders at 49.6 percent with 97 percent of precincts reporting early Tuesday morning.

But in the end, a virtual tie in Iowa is an acceptable, if not ideal, result for Mrs. Clinton and an ominous one for Mr. Sanders. He failed to win a state tailor made to his strengths.


He fares best among white voters. The electorate was 91 percent white, per the entrance polls. He does well with less affluent voters. The caucus electorate was far less affluent than the national primary electorate in 2008. He’s heavily dependent on turnout from young voters, and he had months to build a robust field operation. As the primaries quickly unfold, he won’t have that luxury.

More~ http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/02/upshot/how-the-virtual-tie-in-iowa-helps-hillary-clinton.html



BooScout~

http://www.democraticunderground.com/110739857

[font color=blue]Hillary's Group~Mahalo~[/font]

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why ‘Virtual Tie’ in Iowa Is Better for Clinton Than Sanders (Original Post) Cha Feb 2016 OP
Just one county which is stronger for Hillary, still waiting before Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #1
Thank you for that, Thinkingabout! Cha Feb 2016 #2
K&R sheshe2 Feb 2016 #3
You really do! Cha Feb 2016 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #5
A glaring weakness ... NurseJackie Feb 2016 #6
It's all good! Ana Hauhet Feb 2016 #7
Hillary actually won big among Democrats! Walk away Feb 2016 #8
Good to know.. the Indies will go for Hillary in the GE! Cha Feb 2016 #10
The beginning of the end. yallerdawg Feb 2016 #9
K&R ismnotwasm Feb 2016 #11
A win is a win. It was close but it was still a win. comradebillyboy Feb 2016 #12
More tweets on it! Cha Feb 2016 #13
Great tweets. I might have to set up comradebillyboy Feb 2016 #14
You should katmille Feb 2016 #16
Kick & very highly recommended! William769 Feb 2016 #15
Mahalo William! Cha Feb 2016 #17
K & R SunSeeker Feb 2016 #18

Cha

(297,650 posts)
4. You really do!
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 06:58 AM
Feb 2016

I know the feeling.. hard to tear ourselves away from such a Sweet Hard Fought Victory, she!

They threw everything at her and she remained strong and confident with dignity.. and Hillary Won Iowa!!

They can claim she has "no momentum from Iowa.." and they can hang on to that.. but..

As Bravenak says.. "History is Made.. Iowa goes Clinton for the first time ever!! It goes to a WOMAN for the first time ever!! History MADE!!"

That's Hillary's MOMENTUM.. Booom!

Response to Cha (Original post)

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
9. The beginning of the end.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:02 AM
Feb 2016

A 'political revolution' of the epic proportions Senator Sanders (I-VT) required to begin in Iowa cannot be a 'virtual tie.'

Yeah, yeah - the misery will continue for a few more weeks, but the deck is stacked against an independent upsetting the presumptive Democrat in our Democratic Primaries!

So corporate M$M (it's a contest! - for advertising dollars), Republicans (see what the Benghazi Committee is doing to Hillary?), independents, leftwing liberals, socialist-leaning parties, Hillary Haters -- bring it on!

You know who is still standing?

comradebillyboy

(10,175 posts)
12. A win is a win. It was close but it was still a win.
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:49 AM
Feb 2016

But the media needs it's horse race narrative to prop up ratings especially at that pathetic wreck of a network MSNBC.

Cha

(297,650 posts)
13. More tweets on it!
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 11:51 AM
Feb 2016
John Haltiwanger
✔ ?@jchaltiwanger
Fun fact: Iowa is 92.1 percent white. Not exactly representative of the US. #IowaCaucus
4:36 PM - 1 Feb 2016 · Brooklyn,
52 52 Retweets 73 73 likes

Ari Melber

Oh, and this..

✔ ?@AriMelber
Brightest news for Clinton tonight:
People who identify as Dems backed her by 17 points -- Sanders made up the gap with Independents.

7:32 PM - 1 Feb 2016
182 182 Retweets 263 263 likes

Ari Melber
✔ ?@AriMelber
And Clinton beat Sanders among union households by 9 points, undercutting some conventional wisdom.
7:38 PM - 1 Feb 2016
189 189 Retweets 153 153 likes

SEIU
✔ ?@SEIU
@HillaryClinton won this close, hard battle with strong SEIU ground support & turn out! #ImWithHer #SEIUForHillary https://twitter.com/AriMelber/status/694394551327391744
4:05 AM - 2 Feb 2016
25 25 Retweets 34 34 likes

http://theobamadiary.com/2016/02/02/early-bird-chat-655/#comments





katmille

(213 posts)
16. You should
Tue Feb 2, 2016, 04:12 PM
Feb 2016

It's really fun to follow on Twitter. Just select all the people or organizations you want to follow and you'll get their tweets. I follow a lot of progressives, Clinton operatives and a few journalists. And it is easy.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Why ‘Virtual Tie’ in Iowa...