Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueMTexpat

(15,370 posts)
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:01 PM Jan 2016

"Likeability" and women political candidates

Is Hillary Clinton “likable enough”? Science has an answer.

This is an interesting read.

Across a wide spectrum of traditionally male-dominated professions, women are becoming leaders with increasing frequency. But they haven’t yet been able to shed the social penalties that accompany climbing up the ladder. The same behaviors that are required of women to achieve professional success are also seen by others as "difficult," "abrasive," and "selfish." In a word, unlikable.

In studies where participants are asked to examine a job candidate, where the only variable changed is the candidate’s gender, they typically rate female candidates as equally competent to their male counterparts, but they’re perceived as much colder.

Behind this phenomenon is what researchers call a "backlash." Women who become managers in male-dominated fields are often the subject of intense negativity – employees tend to like and respect them less than male bosses.

That’s because when women act assertively or competitively, or when they appear emotionally restrained, these women are flouting gender norms about how they should behave. Researchers have found that this dislike comes from the perception that these women aren’t nurturing or cooperative.


More at http://www.vox.com/2016/1/1/10695570/hillary-clinton-likable
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Likeability" and women political candidates (Original Post) BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 OP
Studies have arrived at the same conclusions ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #1
We're all damned if we do and BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #3
I wouldn't wish the grind of the Office, and the trail to that Office, on Michelle Obama ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #5
They have done the US very proud, BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #6
Yes they have. eom 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #8
I have heard similar remarks, like Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #2
Yes, the misogyny remains BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #4
Great reply ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2016 #7
This was back a while when women was accepted into what was traditionally reserved for men. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #9
Great article. Thanks for the post. riversedge Jan 2016 #10
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
1. Studies have arrived at the same conclusions ...
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 03:11 PM
Jan 2016

regarding "impressions" with respect to African-Americans that survive/rise through the corporate ranks, and much so with African-American females.

BlueMTexpat

(15,370 posts)
3. We're all damned if we do and
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 08:21 AM
Jan 2016

damned if we don't - twice damned for AA females!

One of my secret hopes for the 2016 election cycle was for Michelle Obama to throw her hat into the ring. OK, she has NO elected political experience for herself, but her poise, grace, intelligence and downright common sense - together with name recognition and general lack of political baggage - MORE than make up for that, IMO. But the Obama family is due a well-deserved rest and I am sure that she will continue to contribute positively to US political and social discourse in the meantime.

Who knows what the future may hold, even if the odds look pretty remote right now. In the meantime, I'm with Hillary.

Happy New Year, 1SBM!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
5. I wouldn't wish the grind of the Office, and the trail to that Office, on Michelle Obama ...
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:06 AM
Jan 2016

she, her husband and, most of all, their (not so, anymore) little one's deserve a break. They all have comported themselves well.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
2. I have heard similar remarks, like
Fri Jan 1, 2016, 08:38 PM
Jan 2016

"The only reason you got this job was because you are a woman" of which I replied "The only reason you got the job before me was because you are a man".

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
7. Great reply ...
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:15 AM
Jan 2016

Next time (should there be a next time), add:

"The only reason you got this job was because you are a woman" of which I replied "The only reason you got the job before me was because you are a man ... Now. Do you really want to compare performance, now that we are both here?".


The misnomer of Affirmative Action is that it has anything to do with retention ... Affirmative Action may (or may not) have been how you got in the door; but, competence is what keeps you there ... and opportunity (the next challenge) is what allows you to soar; at this point, women (and other minorities) must CREATE the opportunities, that others are just granted.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
9. This was back a while when women was accepted into what was traditionally reserved for men.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:18 AM
Jan 2016

I made the point shortly after getting the position and they found women was more accurate and good record keepers. Thanks for your support, only a few said this verbally, most was accepting.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»"Likeability" and women p...