Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DeepModem Mom

(38,402 posts)
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 06:02 PM Nov 2015

In Iowa, Democratic activists not upset by Clinton’s Sept. 11 comments: (Hillary Group)

AMES, Iowa — To listen to the pundits is to conclude that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s comments at Saturday night’s debate invoking the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to explain her coziness to Wall Street was a gaffe so tone-deaf that it might haunt her campaign.

But a handful of Iowa partisans interviewed Sunday at a local Democratic Party barbecue here in Ames drew different conclusions.

“It didn’t bother me. No, not at all,” said John Stein, 51, a supporter of Clinton rival Bernie Sanders. “It was a good-faith attempt to answer a question she was asked. Some folks are trying to make something out of nothing.”

Sue Seedorff-Keninger said, “I take her at her word. It makes sense. Those were her constituents.” Seedorff-Keninger, 62, who has not decided which Democrat to caucus for, added, “I wasn’t bothered by it. I didn’t see it as a gaffe. I saw it as an explanation for why she received money from them.”

When Clinton supporter Valinda Parsons, 56, was asked about the exchange, she admitted, “That question, I don’t even remember it.” When a reporter described it, Parsons said it did not bother her. “Not a bit. She is the most qualified candidate. No other candidate compares.”

The interviewees in Ames hardly make up a representative or scientific sampling, and people’s opinions about Clinton’s Sept. 11 remarks could change in coming days. But their comments Sunday suggested that the immediate reaction of Democratic activists in Iowa, whose Feb. 1 caucuses kick off the presidential nominating contest, is markedly different than that of her critics nationally....

...the prevailing sentiment, at least among the Ames crowd, was that the controversy over her Sept. 11 comments was much ado about nothing.

"There's a logic to what she said when you think about it," Martha Anderson, 77, said of Clinton's remarks.

Asked whether she saw the Sept. 11 line as a "gaffe," Anderson, who has not settled on which Democrat to support, shrugged and said, "The pundits say that all the time. They always pick up on something that's going to haunt somebody. But pundits are who pundits are."

“She was the senator from New York and the entire country was attacked,” added Paul Fitzgerald, the Story County sheriff, who has not endorsed yet in the Democratic race.

“My God,” he added, “what’s the big deal?”

Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/11/15/in-iowa-democratic-activists-not-upset-by-clintons-sept-11-comments/?postshare=9951447619547104&tid=ss tw


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Iowa, Democratic activists not upset by Clinton’s Sept. 11 comments: (Hillary Group) (Original Post) DeepModem Mom Nov 2015 OP
Agreed Iliyah Nov 2015 #1
K&R RandySF Nov 2015 #2
Interesting responses mcar Nov 2015 #3
For those who campaign for BS... this is it in a nutshell.. "Some folks are trying to make something Cha Nov 2015 #4
I recorded the debates and did see them until later but when I read some of the posts on DU I knew Thinkingabout Nov 2015 #5
From "Meet the Press" Sunday... yallerdawg Nov 2015 #6

Cha

(297,655 posts)
4. For those who campaign for BS... this is it in a nutshell.. "Some folks are trying to make something
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:35 PM
Nov 2015
out of nothing.”

In Iowa, Democratic activists not upset by Clinton’s Sept. 11 comments


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/11/15/in-iowa-democratic-activists-not-upset-by-clintons-sept-11-comments/?postshare=9951447619547104&tid=ss

Thank you so much for this, DM M!

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
5. I recorded the debates and did see them until later but when I read some of the posts on DU I knew
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:40 PM
Nov 2015

Hillary had won the debate. It was a pile on, every sentence was twisted and the RW talking points returned.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
6. From "Meet the Press" Sunday...
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 02:08 PM
Nov 2015

If you saw the show, remember this?

ANDREA MITCHELL

A 9/11 defense, it reminds you of Rudy Giuliani when he was running for President and it was 9/11, 9/11, 9/11. I mean it just was so dissonant, and clearly that is being picked up by a lot people.

CHUCK TODD:

But I have to say, does this matter? I want to show a quick excerpt of a focus group. Democratic focus group, Democratic voters, quickly last night on who do you trust on terrorism. Here's a quick take.

(BEGIN TAPE)

FOCUS GROUP LEADER:

Of the three candidates on the stage tonight, who do you think is more capable of dealing with issues like terrorism, all right, Hillary, Bernie or O'Malley? How many would say O'Malley? (NO HANDS RAISED) Okay, how many would say Sanders? (NO HANDS RAISED) How many say Hillary? (EVERYONE RAISES HANDS) The entire group

(END TAPE)

http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meet-press-november-15-2015-n463806
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»In Iowa, Democratic activ...