Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,487 posts)
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 08:54 PM Sep 2015

Several weeks ago I speculated that Sanders could win Iowa and NH

Iowa caucus goers are two sides of the extreme. And New Hampshire is a neighbor.

However once we move to Nevada and South Carolina, Hillary will win.

What is important is not to let the optics? (I hate this word) discourage anyone.

In 2008 Obama win in Iowa was, indeed a coronation. And then, supposedly, Hillary regained her place by winning New Hampshire.

Thus, no doubt, the media and others here on DU will make a big issue of Sanders winning both states that do not represent the country.

So it will be important to keep the perspective.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Several weeks ago I speculated that Sanders could win Iowa and NH (Original Post) question everything Sep 2015 OP
It's pretty obvious to me workinclasszero Sep 2015 #1
Yes, she will. Kath1 Sep 2015 #2
Absolutely right...she is over the 50 point range in both Florida and Georgia as of Saturday... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #4
I keep telling them.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #3
I think for Bernie it's a class war, mainly. LuvLoogie Sep 2015 #5
Apparently they do... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2015 #6
What is this "Democratic machine" business murielm99 Sep 2015 #13
So true. Good post FloridaBlues Sep 2015 #7
He's been a big fish in a small pond for a very long time Rose Siding Sep 2015 #9
The big picture! yallerdawg Sep 2015 #8
Neither of his starts are even swing states. Amimnoch Sep 2015 #11
Polls with Biden in them aren't very useful. n/t ellisonz Sep 2015 #10
According to Nate Silver, neither Iowa nor New Hampshire will affect the Democratic race Gothmog Sep 2015 #12
Good article katmille Sep 2015 #14
And a story from the Washington Post confirming question everything Sep 2015 #15
I posted this in GDP regarding the Bernie movement Capn Sunshine Sep 2015 #16
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
1. It's pretty obvious to me
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 09:20 PM
Sep 2015

Why Bernie is polling well in NH and Iowa.

Hillary will be way stronger in the rest of the country especially the south and I'm not talking two small, low population states either.

Many large diverse states.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
4. Absolutely right...she is over the 50 point range in both Florida and Georgia as of Saturday...
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 10:00 PM
Sep 2015

with strong leads in both...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/

As the princess in Frozen sings..."Let it go...Let it go..."

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
3. I keep telling them....
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 09:57 PM
Sep 2015

I just saw them cheering that Bernie is taking Cornell West to South Carolina!!!

Cracked me right up....take the one guy that regularly insults the First Black President to South Carolina and expect to "Win friends and Influence People"....please proceed Mr. Sanders!

LuvLoogie

(7,011 posts)
5. I think for Bernie it's a class war, mainly.
Mon Sep 7, 2015, 01:50 AM
Sep 2015

He is definitely riding anti-Hillary coattails and using the Democratic primary process to legitimize his candidacy. He has no interest in being a Democrat, per se.

What he wants is autocratic rule. He is not interested in change via the legislative process. Yet, in session, he is a typical politician in that respect. He voted for the ACA. He stated that single-player was unrealistic given Congress' make up.

He wants a "revolution," but how does he translate that into law? Where is the down-ticket strategy? Does he expect it to occur via osmosis?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
6. Apparently they do...
Mon Sep 7, 2015, 02:43 AM
Sep 2015

And he wants to ride the anti hillary coat tail so badly that he loses focus and invites an Anti Obama nutter to South Carolina to supposedly try to win some Black voters....I dont think he gets that they are not opposed to HRC and the Anti Obama rhetoric is not going to fly. Its almost a tone deaf move.

Yeah...while they are demanding Hillary demand more debates for them......they don't realize they dont seem too revolutionary if they cannot even make THAT happen! How are they going to change the "Democratic Machine" as they call it......if they cannot even change that.....without demanding someone else do it for them.....they look so very revolutionary! And then they think they can make Congress and Senate change by just yelling "UNFAIR"! Good luck...

murielm99

(30,745 posts)
13. What is this "Democratic machine" business
Tue Sep 8, 2015, 05:02 AM
Sep 2015

they speak of? Isn't it what Bernie is using? He is using Democratic resources to run for President when he says he is running for the Democratic nomination.

Rose Siding

(32,623 posts)
9. He's been a big fish in a small pond for a very long time
Mon Sep 7, 2015, 11:15 AM
Sep 2015

When/if the national media get hold of him, it will be bloody.

Still, maybe a relief from their caricature of The Ambitious Woman.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
8. The big picture!
Mon Sep 7, 2015, 10:00 AM
Sep 2015

Still looks the same!

Green: Hillary Clinton ahead, 26 states + 1 shared

Blue: Bernie Sanders ahead, 1 state + 1 shared

Gray: No polling data in last six months, 22 states & D.C. (Why bother!)



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statewide_opinion_polling_for_the_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016

 

Amimnoch

(4,558 posts)
11. Neither of his starts are even swing states.
Mon Sep 7, 2015, 08:16 PM
Sep 2015

Especially Ohio. No president has been elected without Ohio's Electoral college votes since Kennedy.

Gothmog

(145,321 posts)
12. According to Nate Silver, neither Iowa nor New Hampshire will affect the Democratic race
Tue Sep 8, 2015, 12:10 AM
Sep 2015

Go read Nate Silver. http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/bernie-sanders-new-hampshire/

So why do I still think Sanders is a factional candidate? He hasn’t made any inroads with non-white voters — in particular black voters, a crucial wing of the Democratic coalition and whose support was a big part of President Obama’s toppling of Clinton in the 2008 primary. Not only are African-Americans the majority of Democratic voters in the South Carolina primary (a crucial early contest), they make up somewhere between 19 percent and 24 percent of Democrats nationwide. In the past two YouGov polls, Sanders has averaged just 5 percent with black voters. Ipsos’s weekly tracking poll has him at an average of only 7 percent over the past two weeks. Fox News (the only live-interview pollster to publish results among non-white voters in July and August) had Clinton leading Sanders 62-10 among non-white Democrats in mid-July and 65-14 in mid-August. Clinton’s edge with non-whites held even as Sanders cut her overall lead from 40 percentage points to 19.

There are other indications that Sanders is unlikely to win the nomination. He hasn’t won a single endorsement from a governor, senator or member of the U.S. House of Representatives (unlike Obama at this point in the 2008 campaign). Sanders is also well behind in the money race (again, unlike Obama). These indicators haven’t changed over the past month.

But even if you put aside those metrics, Sanders is running into the problem that other insurgent Democrats have in past election cycles. You can win Iowa relying mostly on white liberals. You can win New Hampshire. But as Gary Hart and Bill Bradley learned, you can’t win a Democratic nomination without substantial support from African-Americans.

katmille

(213 posts)
14. Good article
Tue Sep 8, 2015, 03:03 PM
Sep 2015

And Bernie is an Independent and like I've said several times, he won't run as an Independent, not beause he doesn't want to siphon votes away from a Democrat, but BECAUSE he wants to USE the Democrats. He won't admit to being a Democrat (though he caucauses with them in the Senate), but wants the Democratic nomination.
I don't think so!!

Capn Sunshine

(14,378 posts)
16. I posted this in GDP regarding the Bernie movement
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 06:21 PM
Sep 2015

Look, fair disclosure, I work for the DNC. My task is to advise the Sanders Campaign for the purpose of keeping the young activated and reaching out for Hillary after the primaries are over.

Unless she commits a HUGE GIGANTIC GAFFE larger than Trumps ego, the Sanders flame will burn out after New Hampshire. Here's my post from a while back:

Here are the cold facts:

On Ground Take:
1st or 2nd in New Hampshah
1st or 2nd in Iowa

Then what?

Nevada? you're polling @ 26%

S Carolina: average as of 8/3
Clinton 67.0
Biden 10.5
Sanders 9.0
O'Malley 2.0
Webb 1.5

Spread Clinton +56.5

You'll need a major miracle there

Then Comes

Alabama - last poll
Hillary Clinton Bernie Sanders
78% 34%<------this is an oultlier, most Bernie at 10% but I'm staying positive
Better hit the ground running, tomorrow

Arkansas- Hillary is at 70% in her home state

Colorado -we have bigger problems there structurally; Rubio is leading any Dem. The latest is
Hillary 38 Bernie 37 - so a toss up

Georgia
Hillary 51%
Bernie 24%

Massachusetts
Hillary 43%
Bernie 34% ---- Sanders gaining at last flash poll taken Friday

Minnesota
Hillary 50%
Bernie 34% -- some forward momentum in the last Flash Poll, 9/1

N. Carolina
Hillary 55%
Bernie 20%

Oklahoma
Damned if there's enough Democrats to poll..no data available


That only takes you through March 1. Seeing a trend? If you hope to prevail beyond IA and NH, you have your work cut out for you. A HUGE GIGANTIC ground effort is needed. NOW. ASAP. This isn't happening by magic. And conservatively, you'll need to raise another 12 million to keep the machine going.

I'm not trying to harsh your buzz, just wake you up. If I were you, I'd stop posting about Hillary being a such bad person and start working on a real world real time plan to match the grand pronouncements being made by DU Sanders partisans. You need a proactive, flexible, boom movement that gets the buzz really going with active voters at street level. Block by block, precinct by precinct. Right now it's just not up to snuff.

The Sanders Campaign is checking in tonight so we'll see how much of my advice they took.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Several weeks ago I specu...