Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumThank you EarlG! HILLARY CLINTON ROOM
IR Team (EarlG) banned candelista
Mail Message
Reason:
Trolling with multiple accounts (candelista, Beauregard), previously banned.
http://www.democraticunderground.com?com=profile&uid=316121&sub=trans
Real name:
DU Member for: 1 years, 1 months, 5 days
Posts: 1,986
Recommendations: 117
Star member: No
MIR Team (EarlG) banned Beauregard
Mail Message
Reason:
Trolling with multiple accounts (candelista, Beauregard), previously banned.
http://www.democraticunderground.com?com=profile&uid=322593&sub=trans
Real name:
DU Member for: 4 months, 5 days
Posts: 376
Recommendations: 22
Star member: No
Cha
(297,686 posts)*******! Turnouts he wasn't very smart with his damn sock puppet, either. One of him wasn't enough... he thought we needed at least two posters with his hateful/mean spirited spiel.
Thank you for the News, Justin!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)We are infested.
Cha
(297,686 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)And for the jury that does not mean I am saying all Sanders supporters.
still_one
(92,407 posts)about positions on issues, but speculation, and rumors that at the most should be going into the General Discussion : Primary group, not LBN
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)still_one
(92,407 posts)Cha
(297,686 posts)still_one
(92,407 posts)riversedge
(70,305 posts)I just thought she was exceptionally rude--and I noted she had really dissed Obama in her post.
Glad she is gone.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)Why did it take so long?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Cha
(297,686 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)So the sock and its master was here to create hatred between Democrats in order to benefit the GOP.
IDK how many Sanders supporters were subjected to this troll's abuse but it had to have contributed to bad feelings here. I had C and B on Ignore since s/he seemed like a couple of nasty piece of work. So I may have missed its posts bashing Bernie.
Hate to say it, but I'm sure there's another sock in the works to take the place of this one. Good job by EarlG finding what this one was up to here at DU.
Cha
(297,686 posts)using the same language agreeing on issues.
Musta got called out on it and decided to change faces... LOL candelista.. not too clever were ya?
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)Making violet threats to his or herself. Almost seems like DTG.
Cha
(297,686 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)GusBob
(7,286 posts)A month ago July 24th.
Cha
(297,686 posts)attention to candelista or Beau since.. and now look what happened!
yardwork
(61,711 posts)We've had other unmaskings when trolls went kamikaze. They seem to get a kick out of it.
Cha
(297,686 posts)progressoid
(49,999 posts)Making a sock to attack yourself. Somebody needs another hobby.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Cha
(297,686 posts)candelista out with him.
NanceGreggs
(27,818 posts)"A prolific poster on a political message board was found dead earlier this morning, having been fatally attacked by himself following a violent argument over a string of jury hides. Neighbours reported hearing said poster screaming, "You're the sock!" "No, you're the sock!" repeatedly for several hours.
Family members have requested that friends donate RECs in lieu of flowery replies."
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Cha
(297,686 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,241 posts)Response to Tarheel_Dem (Reply #15)
hrmjustin This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,241 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,241 posts)mcar
(42,375 posts)Also why we should serve when asked.
Cha
(297,686 posts)I could never say what I really thought of candelista for the continuous streams of propaganda against President Obama and For putin.
And, now against Hillary.. So glad it's over. Hope it really is OVER.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)This was my weird encounter :
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1171537
Cha
(297,686 posts)strong twist of victimhood tossed in.
I use to have my own encounters and am every bit as happy as you are that he was finally shown the door. Him and his alter ego.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)for their entertainment.
still_one
(92,407 posts)They tried their thing in Soc Prog too. We were polite (probably more so than we needed to be) but dredging up a 3-month old anti-Hillary article and just dumping it in our group was unappreciated. And I say that as a supporter of one of the other primary candidates. Trolling badly.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)God, people are weird.
TBF
(32,096 posts)old material and dumps it without comment. Rude. It's possible to support different candidate and still communicate respectfully. I don't believe that person has the interest of the workers at heart.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)I was on one of the juries that voted 7 to 0 to Hide one of Beauregard's posts on that thread where it all blew up (I was juror #2):
----------------------------
Automated Message
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:29 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Is that supposed to be a joke, asshole?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=7108188
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This is the definition of "hurtful, rude, insensitive, over the top...."
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:39 AM, and the Jury voted 7-0 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: FAIL. Easiest decision I've ever had to make on a DU jury.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I don't care who supports who. There is absolutely no excuse for a post such as this. MIRT needs to look at this poster.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Way over the top, good alert. Hide this moronic post.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Though the post responded to was ugly, the rules are pretty clear that this is NOT the way to address the ugly post. Sorry⦠I'm angry over how the conversation continues from that camp, but we should all know how to respond to that ugly stuff by now. They bait people to do exactly what you're being called on. Please learn from this. There is a better way to stand up to ugliness.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: .. goes beyond normal allowances for poor taste
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
William769
(55,148 posts)BooScout
(10,406 posts)Look at all the hidden posts on that thread. It was amazing to watch.