Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forum**HRC Group** 100,000 people have attended Bernie Sanders events this month. That doesn’t mean much.
From the Washington Post:This is the point at which the question invariably turns to the contrast between Clinton and Sanders. Clinton isn't drawing these crowds, the argument goes. Sanders is capturing the energy. Both of which are true points. Sanders, as the underdog and the newcomer, has an energy that Clinton doesn't. She is not drawing the same crowds.
Part of this, though, is a conscious decision. Sanders, coming from the back of the pack, has to show that he's a legit candidate. He needs to be chuffed up. He needs to look big. Clinton has been trying to do the opposite. Her campaign launch was a Sunday e-mail followed by a road trip to Iowa. She's doing her best not to look like a behemoth. Her unofficial launch, on Roosevelt Island, was a neatly tailored group of a few thousand, packed into a space meant to display an audience that size for the cameras.
Could Clinton fill an arena in Los Angeles if she wanted to? Of course she could. Unquestionably. If you think Hillary Clinton can't do basic body mobilization when she needs to, you haven't been paying attention to American politics for the past few decades. There are unions in Los Angeles that can fill a stadium on a week's notice. This is not as big a task as it looks.
Anyone who thinks Hillary doesn't know exactly what she's doing vis-à-vis her campaign is severely underestimating her. She's been in politics for decades. She's already run a massive national campaign, and she's been planning this for years.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Yes I know, but alas, anything to knock HRC down is so visible here at the DU.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)...but you will never convince folks that it's not all about the bern.....they see what they want to see and forget about reality.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Cha
(297,733 posts)This week has been very depressing for me. I feel like people on both the left and the right are living in an alternate reality that I don't understand. They just won't stop trying to crush her with the media cooking up all the scandal that will continue to feed the hate-beast. Sorry, my spirits are low. I think I might have to take a little break. Ugh.
FloridaBlues
(4,008 posts)They will be large . I remember the extra large crowds gathered for her last campaign
When 99.9 % of polls show him losing there's silence from his supporters.
msrizzo
(796 posts)I mean Mitt Romney had large rallies. That's really not hard to do.
Response to NYC Liberal (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Bye
---------------
To the jurors of this post ( 5-2 hide)
Thank you. Juror who said we can remove it... no we can not. We can only block.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,241 posts)And Seattle. And Minneapolis. And Burlington.
Hekate
(90,837 posts)....when the General Election comes up.
tblue
(16,350 posts)because part of me is rooting for Hillary too and I don't like the way she is constantly put on the defensive. There has always been a VRWC with its sights set on Hillary. She does not deserve and never has deserved this.
Solidarity!
Hekate
(90,837 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)Katrina Vandel Huvel claim that the media is shunning BS and not treating him fairly, but IDK about that. I don't watch FOX or CNN so IDK about what they're saying, but all of the talking heads on MSNBC at least have discussed his large crowds every day , as if they will necessarily translate into votes (and they give him plenty of interviews). Ron Paul also drew large crowds, but never got close to winning many states or the nomination, so right now I have the "show me the money" mindset. Once he rises in the polls (and not just in IA or NH), then I might pay attention to what the talking heads say about the race tightening.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)...there hasn't even been a Democratic debate yet. The Sanders crowd is simply attaching themselves to everything they possibly can in an attempt to thwart the Clinton campaign. I was a Deaniac, we had big crowds, didn't win a single primary.