Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumSanders: No one will have majority of ‘real delegates’ on June 7
No but the separation between you and Hillary is greater than it was between Her and Obama in 2008.
#FeelTheMath
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/sanders-no-one-will-have-majority-of-%e2%80%98real-delegates%e2%80%99-on-june-7/ar-BBtIFMl?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=edgsp
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)"your going to have to eat your lunch all by yourself"
savalez
(3,517 posts)thelordofhell
(4,569 posts)Cha
(297,485 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)perfect song
not a win. Make it a tie. Loved yours and love Linda!
One more~
rbrnmw
(7,160 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)dubyadiprecession
(5,720 posts)teamster633
(2,029 posts)Now I hope he's embarrassed by humiliating defeats in these final days.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Than half of the Super Delegates for a while. Hillary needs 71 delegates to reach the required number of delegates.
savalez
(3,517 posts)bernies "it's not over yet" game after next Tuesady. It's OVER.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)Maybe he can find Jane while he's there!
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)Cha
(297,485 posts)Gov Jerry Brown for dumping on their campaign.
http://www.warrenjasonstreet.com/aal/2016/5/jerry-brown-cuts-bernie-sanders-off-at-the-knees
Walk away~
SunSeeker
(51,630 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)liberal N proud
(60,339 posts)Or did his handlers?
Last time I checked the candidate with the most votes or delegates has a majority.
He can't even get that right.
teamster633
(2,029 posts)...admittedly it's been years since I took calculus, but I remember there was a concept called "imaginary numbers" where "i" was equal to the square root of -1. Somehow the burners have extended this concept into some sort of multi-dimensional framework that allows St. Bernard's delegate count to expand exponentially...something like the big bang. Soon they can claim everyone in the world has voted for the ascendancy of their savior...today the world...tomorrow the whole universe.
liberal N proud
(60,339 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)He's bought into his own hype and no matter what the numbers, nay, the voters have told him, he refuses to believe that the majority of Democratic voters who actually participated in the primary process aren't Feeling the Bern. This tells me one thing: the majority of Democratic voters prefer a pragmatic approach to governance over the "Bern it down" approach.
Sadly, I really respected Sanders before this Primary, now, not so much.
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)You know, it's sad that this man cannot do simple math. She has a YUUUGE pledged delegate lead, and it's going to grow before convention. Yes, she won't have enough delegates?
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)The threshold is 1/2 plus 1 of the pledged delegates available. Bernie Math "forgets" that part.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)If he says that superdelegates are something other than 'real', the upstanding crusader of righteousness that he is, he can't accept their support. And since Hillary is guaranteed to have the majority of those 'real' delegates, Bernie's logic says he's admitting defeat.
Thanks, Bernie!
Mz Pip
(27,452 posts)As arcane and confusing the primary system may be, this is the hand everyone was dealt. Complaining at the end of the process because it didn't go your way doesn't accomplish anything.
rock
(13,218 posts)I've been calling him that for several weeks now. My problem is what do I call him after June 7? Egregiously irrelevant?
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)LiberalFighter
(51,020 posts)Didn't Burlington College have any standards?