Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 03:20 PM Jul 2015

It's Not About Hillary's Emails, But Hillary

I thought this was a good blog about Hillary.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/earl-ofari-hutchinson/its-not-about-hillarys-emails-but-hillary_b_7875102.html


It's Not About Hillary's Emails, But Hillary
Posted: 07/26/2015 9:30 pm EDT Updated: 07/26/2015 9:59 pm EDT


HILLARY CLINTON



That's the number of times Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton will have been dragged before the GOP controlled House Select Committee to testify about Benghazi if she testifies as reports say this October. The date hasn't as yet been officially confirmed. This time the panel will zero in on Clinton's private emails to make the case that as then Secretary of State she either badly bungled the U.S. response to the Benghazi attack or deliberately lied about what she did or didn't do to prevent the attack.

The emails supposedly contain classified material that can be crucial to establishing the GOP's bogus case against Clinton. The GOP quickly jumped all over a report from a government inspector general that a handful of Clinton's personal emails contained classified material. The government investigator did not say what the nature of the classified material was, whether the alleged transmitting of this material was inadvertent, or whose responsibility it was to insure the classified material was marked as classified.

That didn't really matter. The relentless GOP narrative has been that Clinton illegally used her private email account to conduct State Department business and that those emails will show a pattern of neglect, incompetence and cover-up. The story got even bigger when a tantalizing hint was dropped that there could even be a criminal probe into Clinton's supposed misuse of her emails.

None of this is new stuff. It's been hashed and rehashed over so much that if anything the raw facts about the emails have been blurred or distorted. The facts, though, are clear. There is absolutely no proof that Clinton did anything wrong in using her private server to conduct some State Department business. There was no legal prohibition on any government employee using their personal email account to conduct government business at the time she did. The GOP has tried hard to poison the public well with the suggestion that Clinton may have destroyed or mishandled, either deliberately or accidentally, government documents tied back into Benghazi.................

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

George II

(67,782 posts)
1. She's been under fire for one thing or another for almost 30 years - it's what makes her tougher...
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 03:26 PM
Jul 2015

...and now even MORE qualified because she can take just about anything. And she does it with a smile!

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
2. I don't recall the NYT going after Bush and his WMD with this much vigor.
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 03:45 PM
Jul 2015

No one even gives a shit about email-gate. I know no one who has heard of this outside DU. By the time the election comes, any juice this lame squib of a story has will have burned itself out. The NYT caught with its pants down about it just shows how eager they are to try to inflate this into a thing.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
4. NOBODY cares about her emails except for people who never would've voted for her in the first place
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 03:59 PM
Jul 2015

No voter is going to walk into the voting booth next November saying "Well, I like a lot of the things Hillary says about the issues, but her emails...I don't know. I better just vote for Trump/Walker/Jeb/Rubio."

Please.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»It's Not About Hillary's ...