Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DeepModem Mom

(38,402 posts)
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 09:56 PM Jul 2015

Hillary Clinton, the New York Times, and the Crisis of Ethics in U.S. Media

Can organizational culture damage a newspaper’s reporting? In the wake of the disastrously inaccurate story about Hillary Clinton’s emails published and amended by the New York Times over the past two days, we’ve been asked this question in many ways by #HillaryMen followers....

Erroneously reporting that the frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination is the subject of a criminal inquiry and then ever so slowly walking it back in a series of revisions and non-corrections is one of the most troubling chapters in the paper’s recent history. Regardless of whether some portions of the story are correct, getting it wrong on a matter of criminality is unconscionable.

The Times has not – to date – taken responsibility in any way. The paper seems to be hiding behind a business as usual policy; there has been no admission of wrong-doing, no real public discussion on Eighth Avenue, no transparency....

This behavior from the Times matters to the race for the presidency and Hillary’s quest to break the ultimate gender barrier in American politics. It matters for the crisis of ethics in U.S. media, where one of the most accomplished, popular and powerful women in our history is regularly disparaged and disrespected by major publications. In fact, the terminology used to describe Hillary by the mainstream media often exceeds, in its virulence, the worst language of anonymous Clinton-hating trolls....

As one of our preeminent media institutions, the New York Times should be showing leadership on coverage of the first woman candidate with a viable shot at the White House. Instead, the reverse seems to be true. The Times fully understands that its silence on an inaccurate – and frankly, unethical – story in its own pages gives Hillary’s political opponents more leverage, more running room, and harsher talking points to advance a destructive political cause....

Nothing better exemplifies that poisoned culture than having the institution look the other way – or worse, repeatedly reward and encourage – Maureen Dowd’s creepy, personal, and bizarre attacks against Hillary over two decades....

http://www.hillarymen.com/latest/hillary-clinton-ny-times-media-crisis-of-ethics?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=socialnetwork via HillaryMen (Tom Watson and Peter Dauo)

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton, the New York Times, and the Crisis of Ethics in U.S. Media (Original Post) DeepModem Mom Jul 2015 OP
This is really a good read ismnotwasm Jul 2015 #1
I really can't imagine how ppl -- how so many ppl -- can have the depravity... DeepModem Mom Jul 2015 #3
The falsehoods of so many articles is sickening. Iliyah Jul 2015 #2
Unrelenting character assassination - is misogyny a significant factor? yallerdawg Jul 2015 #4
If you are as disgusted with the New York Times as I am..... Walk away Jul 2015 #5
Kick & Recommended. William769 Jul 2015 #6

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
1. This is really a good read
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 10:31 PM
Jul 2015
There is a larger dynamic at play. The rise of social media has fostered a cauldron of misogyny, where psychological violence against women is commonplace. The verbal abuse directed at Hillary – and let's not pretend some of these attacks are anything other than abuse – is a permutation of that problem.


Exactly.

DeepModem Mom

(38,402 posts)
3. I really can't imagine how ppl -- how so many ppl -- can have the depravity...
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 11:00 PM
Jul 2015

to write the vile things about Hillary we see.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
4. Unrelenting character assassination - is misogyny a significant factor?
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 09:28 AM
Jul 2015
As one of our preeminent media institutions, the New York Times should be showing leadership on coverage of the first woman candidate with a viable shot at the White House. Instead, the reverse seems to be true. The Times fully understands that its silence on an inaccurate – and frankly, unethical – story in its own pages gives Hillary’s political opponents more leverage, more running room, and harsher talking points to advance a destructive political cause.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
5. If you are as disgusted with the New York Times as I am.....
Mon Jul 27, 2015, 10:39 AM
Jul 2015

there are several alternatives (not necessarily better and some worse). I cancelled my long time subscription to the NYT over this. I decided to look around for other newspaper links to click on for my morning news.

For anyone thinking of doing the same, here are some other news sources with in-depth reporting....

McClatchy http://www.mcclatchydc.com/

The Guardian http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news

The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/

As I said, these are not necessarily better than the NYT but if you subscribe to the NYT online and you want to make a point and cancel with reason as I did, these on line papers are reasonable substitutes with the added benefit of being free. That way if they report lies and distortions, at least you aren't paying them to do it!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Hillary Clinton, the New ...