Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumEh, that figures. MSNBC calls it for Sanders.
Oh well, Kentucky's good enough for me.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1002 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Eh, that figures. MSNBC calls it for Sanders. (Original Post)
NuclearDem
May 2016
OP
MADem
(135,425 posts)1. I am shocked it was as close as it was--I really thought he'd get both of 'em, tonight.
She's still way ahead in pledged delegates.
He needs to win 70% of all the left over votes from here on out. Ain't happening. You think they feel the Bern in NJ? Fuggedaboutit!!!
still_one
(92,227 posts)3. exactly. If it ends under 10% it is effective a loss for him
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)2. Looking forward to see how the margin ends up.
I don't think the target for Sanders will be reached this time either.
ismnotwasm
(41,991 posts)4. 52-46? Oregon?
I suppose the numbers might get better for him, but dayum. That's gotta burn.