This post in the Hillary Group received a 'leave it alone'

[kstewart33]

By a 3-4 vote.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1107&pid=135410

[Laurian]

1. That post was gross and reinforced my feelings about Berners.

I cannot imagine talking to a fellow DUer that way.

[Cha]

2. Were you on the jury?

Because I was the one who alerted.. and I never alert but this one I did.

I also reported the results to the Admin because it was against TOS.. you should report it, too, if you were on the jury.

The weird thing is it says I sent the alert @ 10:11am and I didn't I sent it around 4:20am.

On Tue May 17, 2016, 10:11 AM you sent an alert on the following post:

[kstewart33]

4. Cha, I alerted the post after you did.

I was informed via email about the results.

The result was stunning, given the post's content. June 8 can't come soon enough.

[Cha]

5. Oh, I see.. that's how you knew it was 3-4 leave.

Yeah, I abuse alerted it, too.. it's suppose to the Admins.. told them it was a Leave against TOS.

Those people should not be allowed to be on juries that allowed it.

Thank you, stewart

[dhol82]

3. Curious.

I would have voted to hide.
Especially since a remarkably similar post was recently hidden.

[GusBob]

6. everyone needs to alert on the post and get him bounced off DU

that shit aint gonna fly much longer on DU

[leftofcool]

7. In light of Nevada, I'd say the post and jury were predictable

[LAS14]

8. The last time I posted an alert that...

... was in appropriate for a protected group, I was told to ban the poster. I thought it was probably just a mistake by someone seeing it in Latest or Greatest and didn't think banning a person for one slip was appropriate. They ought to have hidden this as it's clearly inappropriate for a protected group.

[LiberalFighter]

9. I alerted on it and expect appropriate action will be taken.