Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Lisa0825

(14,487 posts)
2. OK, this is weird.... I clicked on the link, and it says "Your alert was sent."
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:46 PM
Apr 2016

I didn't alert on it! I was wondering if I accidentally clicked, but it would take more than one click to alert, wouldn't it??

Is this a known glitch?

Lisa0825

(14,487 posts)
9. It seems like more posts that should be hidden are being hidden lately.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:50 PM
Apr 2016

(at least when I consider the juries I have been on)

Maybe reality is setting in a bit?

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
13. Jury Results
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:53 PM
Apr 2016

Mail Message
On Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:38 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

There should be a serious discusion about Bill and Hillary's sex life before Bill's Presidency
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511873800

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Flame bait

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Apr 30, 2016, 11:46 PM, and the Jury voted 6-1 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: You have got to be kidding me! I would hope that DU has not sunk this low to allow a post like this stay.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Not sure it is flame bait, but there has to some line we can reasonably draw.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This subject is outside my jurisdiction, even if it is germane to some public events.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This violates DU's TOS.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
18. Skinner often reviews jury results, you know. He said so.
Sun May 1, 2016, 10:34 AM
May 2016

Apparently, jurors who approve of things that should OBVIOUSLY be hidden (and vice versa) will have their jury privileges suspended.

I'm guessing that the frivolous alerters won't suffer any consequences, but those jurors who enable it will be subject to penalties.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
14. I see people's true colors and their slips are showing at this time.
Sun May 1, 2016, 12:02 AM
May 2016

Good people are getting desperate and those here to disrupt will show themselves.

It is hard to tell who fits in what category but for me reading DU since the hard fought NY primary has been much harder than anything posted before it.

DU is at a crossroads now and I don't know what is going to happen. But the writing is on the wall that people here will say anything to bring Hillary down before the convention.

DU is a buzz kill now and I think it is best for me not to engage them. They will only try to Dampen my enthusiasm.

Don't be surprised during May that you only see me post a few times. Thr silly season on DU is in high gear and I want no part of it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»Going downhill