Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 06:03 AM Feb 2012

TUC says more older staff working unpaid

A quarter of a million more people aged in their late 50s and early 60s are now working unpaid overtime than were a decade ago, a report says.

The TUC said the rise was out of line with much of the working population where unpaid overtime had fallen.

It said this reflected people working past normal retirement amid concerns about income in later life.

The trade union organisation said it had found that 660,000 workers in this age group put in unpaid hours in 2011.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-17150380

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TUC says more older staff working unpaid (Original Post) dipsydoodle Feb 2012 OP
What is one supposed to make of this? Owlet Feb 2012 #1
You forgot - geckosfeet Feb 2012 #2
I thought about that.. Owlet Feb 2012 #3
On the contrary, I think there's a lot of that implied in the article muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #6
More like djean111 Feb 2012 #4
This is news? Back in the 80s I noticed the older workers... TreasonousBastard Feb 2012 #5
Same story here. enlightenment Feb 2012 #7

Owlet

(1,248 posts)
1. What is one supposed to make of this?
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 07:35 AM
Feb 2012

1. Dedicated older workers don't know when to go home?

2. Selfish older workers denying younger ones jobs by working unpaid overtime?

3. TUC laying the groundwork for mandatory overtime pay beyond normal working hours?

All of the above?

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
2. You forgot -
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 07:53 AM
Feb 2012

salaried workers being asked to work longer hours to finish work, with the unspoken threat of job loss if they don't.

Owlet

(1,248 posts)
3. I thought about that..
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 08:17 AM
Feb 2012

The article at the link is silent on that issue, and for some reason I got the impression that it was talking about hourly workers. Heck, salaried folks where I used to be employed regularly stayed beyond the time when hourly workers went home. There was no threat of job loss, and the article says nothing about anything like that, as it no doubt would have since it quoted the TUC extensively.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,361 posts)
6. On the contrary, I think there's a lot of that implied in the article
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 10:14 AM
Feb 2012

There's a lot about a long-hours culture, and "it said this reflected people working past normal retirement amid concerns about income in later life." They are worried that if they don't put in extra unpaid hours, they will be told they must leave at the retirement age (because they employers know they can get younger workers to work unpaid overtime), or even made redundant before then.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. More like
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 08:45 AM
Feb 2012

older workers being threatened with job loss if they don't put in unpaid time. I don't know if you noticed, but there is a growing movement to have people work beyond retirement years. It is not selfish to want to earn a living.
I believe Wal-Mart does the same unpaid overtime here in America.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
5. This is news? Back in the 80s I noticed the older workers...
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 09:42 AM
Feb 2012

blew out at exactly 5PM. We were mostly professional/managerial/exempt workers and somehow work was paced so it got done by then. Some of us young turks stayed late to finish special projects-- or, more likely, just weren't that good at pacing the work. The theory was that if work increased we get more people.

Then I noticed that we never got more people, just more demands on our "free" time. Eventually it would all work out, we were told.

It never worked out, though, and long after I got out of the corporate world I saw 60-80 hour weeks as common. Being exempt employees, nobody ever got paid for that extra time.


enlightenment

(8,830 posts)
7. Same story here.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 03:12 PM
Feb 2012

I bailed in the late 80s, when my workweek reached an average 80 hours. It was brutal. I was salaried, but did receive some overtime for about a third of the overtime hours I worked.

They wouldn't have fired me for refusing, but they would have found many other ways to get me to leave - or simply denied me any opportunity for advancement. I can certainly see where older workers may be responding to threats, both real and implied, that they do the extra hours - or else.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»TUC says more older staff...