United Kingdom
Related: About this forumG4S could lose £50m due to Olympic Games security shambles
Private security firm G4S says it stands to lose up to £50m after admitting it is unable to provide enough staff to fulfil its Olympic Games contract, a failure that forced the government to this week call up 3,500 troops to fill in at the 11th hour.
The beleaguered security company said on Friday night that it "deeply regrets" the problems, adding: "G4S accepts its responsibility for the additional cost of the increased military deployment resulting from the shortfall in workforce delivery."
The company's admission it is in line to take a major financial hit over the shambles came hours after the prime minister weighed into the row, warning that firms which failed to deliver on their contracts would be pursued for the money.
The security firm had been committed to supply 13,700 guards as demanded in its contract, worth £284m, which it now says it is unlikely to be able to fulfil. Overall, the 23,700-strong security force for the Games will include a mix of military, private security guards and at least 3,000 unpaid volunteers.
full: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jul/14/g4s-olympic-games-security-shambles
intaglio
(8,170 posts)But I won't hold my breath while waiting for the fines to be levied
non sociopath skin
(4,972 posts)Perhaps Group4Shit would like to put in a tender for running Oncology Services in Surrey?
I'm sure they'd do it so well.
The Skin
fedsron2us
(2,863 posts)In particular given security concerns in the wake of the the July 2005 London bombings why did they wait until 2010 to sign the original contract with G4S for 2000 security personnel and why did they need to revise up the number of staff by 8000 in December 2011.
It appears they got their estimates of the manpower required spectacularly wrong.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18840464
non sociopath skin
(4,972 posts)I'm reading Mark Perryman's book about the Olympics at the moment and a depressing read it is too.
The Skin