There has been a consistent pattern since the "rebels" launched #ChickenCoup that MPs were calling for Corbyn to resign in defiance of the wishes of their CLP's(i.e., the people actually responsible for getting the MPs elected and re-elected).
Moreover, many of the anti-Corbyn MPs were effectively imposed as Labour candidate by Blair, Brown, or Ed Miliband-all of whom forced CLP's in marginal seats to select the candidate from a "shortlist" drawn up by the party central office-usually a list that only included candidates from the right wing of the party, thus leaving the CLP's with no real say over who would be selected, since the differences between a group of "moderates" were always going to be too trivial to matter.
Consquently, those MPs feel deep loyalty to the leaders who imposed them as candidate, but little or none to the Labour Party itself or the values and people it historically fights for.
What Austin did was a far greater show of disloyalty to Corbyn as leader than anything Corbyn ever did as a backbencher. The bills Corbyn defied the leadership on were always reactionary, generally unnecessary, were frequently punitive to core Labour voters and more often than not deeply unpopular. But in voting against them, Corbyn was never personally disrespectful to whoever his party's leader was and certainly never heckled the leader in the HoC. He showed respect then...he's owed respect now.
= new reply since forum marked as read
.
