Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,443 posts)
Tue Jun 13, 2017, 12:42 AM Jun 2017

Murray, Sawant and Herbold Unveil Ordinance to Tax the Rich

On Monday, Mayor Ed Murray and City Councilmembers Kshama Sawant and Lisa Herbold finally unveiled their first draft of a bill that would create a city income tax. If it passes and survives an inevitable court challenge, the tax has the potential to replace regressive taxes all across the state.

According to an official summary, the tax would apply to total annual income that exceeds $250,000 per year for single filers or $500,000 for married couples filing jointly. Anyone who earns less than a quarter million bucks a year would be wholly unaffected by the tax. The tax rate is 2 percent, so a single person earning $300,000 per year would pay $600 into the tax annually—or 2 percent on $50,000.

If city leaders pass the law by July 10, as they have said they intend to, the tax would go into effect on the first day of 2018. City analysts estimate that the tax, which would be collected via the Department of Finance and Administrative Services, would bring in about $125 million in its first year. The funds would be earmarked for lowering property and sales taxes, replacing federal funds if they get cut, providing public services, and implementing and administering the tax itself.

Conventional wisdom holds that income taxes are illegal under the Washington State Constitution as interpreted in the 1933 state Supreme Court case Culliton v. Chase. But as we’ve reported previously, the Culliton ruling took place under unusual circumstances, and some legal scholars believe that today’s state Supreme Court would reject Culliton’s precedent. That’s part of the point of the law, at least for activists: if Seattle’s law passes and survives a court challenge, it could replace the Culliton precedent and allow income taxes to be contemplated by state and local governments. Washington has the single most regressive tax structure in the country, which is to say our taxes fall heaviest on poor people and least on rich people.

Read more: http://www.seattleweekly.com/news/murray-sawant-unveil-ordinance-to-tax-the-rich/

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Washington»Murray, Sawant and Herbol...