Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,071 posts)
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 07:37 PM Jun 2015

Lawmakers scrap oversight panel for viaduct-replacement project

Lawmakers in Olympia have eliminated the independent committee overseeing the trouble-plagued Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement project.

Patricia Galloway, who chaired the Expert Review Panel, said she was "shocked" to receive the termination letter from Washington state Secretary of Transportation Lynn Peterson last week.

The three-member panel was set up four years ago to help lawmakers understand the roles and responsibilities of the contractors and the government for the $3.1 billion project and make recommendations for contract changes.

House Transportation Committee Chairwoman Rep. Judy Clibborn (D-Mercer Island) said the panel is no longer necessary because the division of duties is now well-established and the contract is no longer evolving.

“Even though the project itself may have issues," Clibborn said, "the contract doesn’t need to be opened up and looked at on a regular basis."

-more-

http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2015/06/22/lawmakers-scrap-oversight-panel.html?ana=e_du_pub&s=article_du&ed=2015-06-22&u=ColXVN5SPzQtLHFP87ho2w07857290&t=1435015625

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawmakers scrap oversight panel for viaduct-replacement project (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2015 OP
I can't tell if this is a good thing or a bad thing. Suich Jun 2015 #1
I was shrugging too Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2015 #2
I disagree HeiressofBickworth Jun 2015 #3

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,071 posts)
2. I was shrugging too
Mon Jun 22, 2015, 07:51 PM
Jun 2015

The committee didn't stop the present problems but could it be worse without them? Don't know.

HeiressofBickworth

(2,682 posts)
3. I disagree
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 04:56 AM
Jun 2015

Before I retired I worked for an engineering company -- we continually reviewed portions of contracts to review agreed-upon scope or to recommend revisions of scope and cost. As a project proceeds, previously unknown circumstances or projected work activities can require amendments to contracts. With $3.1B on the table, not having a review panel just invites cost over-runs, scope-creep, if not out right fraud. I think this decision will come back to bite them in the ass.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Washington»Lawmakers scrap oversight...