Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 10:50 PM Sep 2013

Vote NO on 517--yet another product of Tim Eyman's lower intestine

Holee shite! Rob McKenna and the Northwest Progressive Institute on the same side? Order central heating for your spots in hell right now!

http://www.no517.org/

Why vote NO on I-517?
Read these statements from the Washington Voters’ Pamphlet:


I-517 violates Washingtonians’ property rights
Courts have ruled that petitioners must respect private property rights when collecting signatures, but I-517 prevents property owners from having control over signature gathering on their property, infringing upon their constitutionally-guaranteed property rights. Under I-517, law enforcement would be directed to vigorously protect petitioners collecting within a twenty-five foot zone. Business owners would not be able to stop aggressive petitioners from blocking and harassing customers who are trying to enter or exit a store. Instead, their property rights would be disregarded.

I-517 benefits Tim Eyman
•Sponsor Tim Eyman is a full-time initiative proponent who makes money off the measures he promotes. Under I-517, it would be easier and cheaper for Eyman to qualify future initiatives to the ballot, meaning he could double his output and increase his profits.
I-517 would make petitioning more intrusive

•I-517 allows out of state petitioners to be active in Washington year-round – both inside and outside public buildings. Petitioners could go inside sports stadiums like Safeco Field or Comcast Arena, public libraries, and even public school events like high school football games to ask Washingtonians to sign stacks of petitions.
I-517 would increase elections costs

•A provision tucked away in I-517 forces cities and counties to put local initiatives on the ballot even if they’re illegal or invalid, wasting taxpayer dollars on unnecessary elections.
Join former Secretaries of State Ralph Munro and Sam Reed in voting no on I-517.

Arguments prepared by:

Rob McKenna, former Washington State Attorney General; Brian Sonntag, former Washington State Auditor; Jan Gee, Washington Food Industry Association (independent/family-owned grocers); Frank Ordway, League of Education Voters; Andrew Villeneuve; activist and founder of the Northwest Progressive Institute.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vote NO on 517--yet another product of Tim Eyman's lower intestine (Original Post) eridani Sep 2013 OP
Fucking Eyeman has been like a parasite in WA for about 20 years now gopiscrap Sep 2013 #1
exactly MFM008 Sep 2013 #2
Eyman makes it hard to respect the initiative process... Wounded Bear Sep 2013 #3

gopiscrap

(23,761 posts)
1. Fucking Eyeman has been like a parasite in WA for about 20 years now
Sat Sep 14, 2013, 10:55 PM
Sep 2013

and it's because we have a toothless PDC and won't nail his ass for all the campaign violations he's pulled.

Wounded Bear

(58,673 posts)
3. Eyman makes it hard to respect the initiative process...
Sun Sep 15, 2013, 04:15 AM
Sep 2013

He's a fucking douchebag.

Apologies to feminine hygiene products.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Washington»Vote NO on 517--yet anoth...