Boeing is going, so time to woo new plane makers

[eridani]

http://washingtonpolicywatch.org/2013/04/24/boeing-going-so-woo-new-plane-makers/

I didn’t foresee that day in 1997 with Boeing merged with McDonnell Douglas and McDonnell top brass started to call the shots. Or Boeing farming out production to off-shore sites. Or Boeing moving its headquarters to Chicago. Or Boeing making its home state of Washington bend over backwards in a bidding war to build the 787.

We did, with a $3.2 billion tax incentive package to build the 787 in our state. It didn’t actually work out that way. Boeing took the money, and proceeded to outsource most of the aircraft to sites around the world. Then those parts were brought back to Everett, where they were put together. But someone forgot about how to insure quality control when dealing with dozens of different vendors for different parts. That little problem with the batteries catching fire?

Just this week Boeing Commercial Airplanes CEO Ray Conner announced that the redesigned battery has “made a great airplane even better.” So Boeing engineers and machinists in Everett saved the 787, reconfiguring and remaking parts to put the 787 together again. What do these workers, and the taxpayers of our state get for their generosity and forbearance with Boeing? A Boeing investment in South Carolina for a duplicate 787 production line. Next up? Boeing is laying off 1,500 engineers and 800 Machinists in the Puget Sound area, while creating 2,000 new jobs in South Carolina and outsourcing engineering work to its design center in Moscow — that’s Russia, not Idaho…

<snip>

There are other aerospace companies out there — Bombardier and Comac, for starters. They want to manufacture in the U.S., because we have a huge market in flying. We don’t have to engage in a race to the bottom with other states to get aerospace business here. We have a high road for production that will attract manufacturers through a highly skilled organized workforce, with high production standards and incredible shared expertise. When you are building something as complex as an airplane, which can’t stop working in the middle of a flight, that is what you want. High road production insures profitability, a skilled, well-paid, and motivated workforce, and a good quality of life shared among all of us.

When Boeing abandons our state in search of anti-union and low-wage states and countries, we don’t have to become the next Detroit, with empty manufacturing facilities and abandoned runways. We can break the Boeing monopoly and build a 21st economy. Just because one big bird is leaving the nest, doesn’t mean we can’t make it a place for other manufacturers to roost!

[ProgressiveProfessor]

1. Boeing may not sell the facilities and will clearly keep some of them in use

and will clearly keep some of them in use

Bombardier and other will probably head to the lower cost states. What will be the salvation is local subcontractors.

[eridani]

2. Maybe we could stand some lessons from Germany on the subject of--

--how to keep a manufacturing base.

[ProgressiveProfessor]

3. Significantly different circumstances

but why not...