Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

douglas9

(4,358 posts)
Fri Nov 24, 2017, 02:10 PM Nov 2017

Why Texas Senators Cruz and Cornyn Oppose Net Neutrality

On Tuesday, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai released a proposal to erase federal "net neutrality" rules — and gave Americans three weeks to react before it goes to a vote.

Net neutrality regulations keep major internet providers like AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon, from, essentially, having the final say of what their customers can and can't access online. Without these regulations, companies would be able to decide which websites, apps, or videos load faster than others (based on which sites pay the most). They could also charge customers more to access certain website and online services or block customers completely from going to any website they chose.

Pai's plan to repeal the Obama-era net neutrality regulations would open the floodgates of an industry eager to further monetize internet access. At the same time, advocates for net neutrality say it would make it near impossible for small web start-ups, unable to pay for faster loading times, to ever see success.

Few Americans who use the internet are opposed to net neutrality. The FCC has collected a record-breaking 22 million responses to the proposal on the government's website — and the sweeping majority of those oppose the proposed plan. Unlike many recent pieces of legislation and proposals, it seems the public's support of net neutrality is strongly bipartisan. In short, most average internet consumer are for it.

So, who's fighting against these regulations? The country's top internet service providers — and the politicians that benefit from their hefty campaign contributions.

Enter Texas Senators Ted Cruz and John Cornyn.


https://www.sacurrent.com/the-daily/archives/2017/11/24/why-texas-senators-cruz-and-cornyn-oppose-net-neutrality




1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Texas Senators Cruz and Cornyn Oppose Net Neutrality (Original Post) douglas9 Nov 2017 OP
AT&T is really the Texas firm Southwest Bell Cicada Nov 2017 #1

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
1. AT&T is really the Texas firm Southwest Bell
Fri Nov 24, 2017, 02:50 PM
Nov 2017

Southwest Bell grew from a little baby bell into a very big company which acquired ATT.

They now use the name ATT but it’s really Southwest Bell.

Southwest Bell has a long history of corrupting politicians.

But Cruz and Cornyn may also be trying to help out the remaining business units still in Texas.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Why Texas Senators Cruz a...