Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,456 posts)
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 10:18 PM Aug 2017

Federal judge dismisses Texas' sanctuary cities lawsuit

AUSTIN — U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks on Wednesday dismissed Attorney General Ken Paxton's lawsuit against Austin, El Paso County and other local governments over the state's new ban on so-called sanctuary cities.

Paxton filed a preemptive lawsuit in federal court hours after Gov. Greg Abbott signed the ban into law in May, asking that it be declared constitutional.

While Sparks' decision avoided commenting on the legal merits of the sanctuary cities law, he added a footnote to the ruling that included a broader statement on state and local efforts to regulate immigration in Texas.

"The federal government has the exclusive power to enforce immigration laws, and regardless of its intent, no state or local entity can interfere with the enforcement of these laws," Sparks wrote.

Read more: http://www.elpasotimes.com/story/news/politics/texlege/2017/08/09/federal-judge-dismisses-texas-sanctuary-cities-lawsuit/554230001/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge dismisses Texas' sanctuary cities lawsuit (Original Post) TexasTowelie Aug 2017 OP
Not sure I understand the ruling MichMan Aug 2017 #1
There is another lawsuit pending and Sparks is deferring to that lawsuit Gothmog Aug 2017 #3
Sam Sparks is a great judge Gothmog Aug 2017 #2

MichMan

(11,979 posts)
1. Not sure I understand the ruling
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 10:30 PM
Aug 2017

"The federal government has the exclusive power to enforce immigration laws, and regardless of its intent, no state or local entity can interfere with the enforcement of these laws," Sparks wrote.


If a state can't sue a city to enforce a ban on sanctuary cities, doesn't that also mean that sanctuary cities by definition are also illegal?

Gothmog

(145,624 posts)
2. Sam Sparks is a great judge
Wed Aug 9, 2017, 11:57 PM
Aug 2017

This means that the case in San Antonio will be the case with jurisdiction on this issue. I like the judge in that case who is also one of the judges on the three judge redistricting case. http://kut.org/post/federal-judge-hears-arguments-over-texas-new-sanctuary-cities-law


A federal judge in San Antonio is hearing arguments today in a lawsuit filed by several cities, including Austin, seeking to block enforcement of the state's new anti-sanctuary cities law, Senate Bill 4.

U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia will rule on whether SB 4 should be allowed to take effect Sept. 1 while a court battle plays out. The bill, signed by Gov. Greg Abbott in May, requires jurisdictions to honor all requests from Immigration and Customs Enforcement to detain suspected undocumented immigrants and allows local law enforcement officials to question a person's immigration status during a routine stop. It also punishes officials who do not cooperate with federal immigration laws.
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Texas»Federal judge dismisses T...